Skitzocow Mark Bernstein - Ryulong 2.0, Creepy Paranoid Stalker and Anti-Gamergate Loser with Delusions of Grandeur

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Mark chimped out about Wikipedia yet again, this time heckling someone who claimed to have been working to support Mark's insanity on Wikipedia.

View attachment 172240
View attachment 172243
View attachment 172251
View attachment 172253
View attachment 172254
View attachment 172255

Mark claims a "university Librarian" was "fired for not supporting alt-right on Wikipedia." He's presumably talking about Robert "Gamaliel" Fernandez, who was attacked by Samuel Collingwood Smith but not fired.

View attachment 172244

View attachment 172248

Mark tagged in Fernandez and was told again to stop tagging him in.

View attachment 172238

He also accused someone of being a Russian agent.

View attachment 172252
Someone really should ask Mark Bernstein why he hassles people contributing positively to Wikipedia and exposes Gamaliel to continued risk, instead of directing his autism toward punishing Samuel Collingwood Smith. It surely couldn't be the result of a personal vendetta over him being punished for violating policy.
 
upload_2017-1-10_18-17-39.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: KotAGoR VIII
Mark is, to all known evidence, a true believer. He does not need to be bribed into believing the shit he believes, he truly feels that way. It's one of the reasons he hasn't, to anyone's knowledge, been bribed or subverted into editing for money, he's a zealot by choice.

Ryulong/Micheal Cohen, on the other hand, has been caught red-handed taking money for editing a party line. He has openly admitted he will ignore evidence that proves him dead wrong if he doesn't like the source, while Mark looks the truth dead in the face and calls it lies because, to all known knowledge, he truly believes his own bullshit.

Mark is a pathetic zealous wretch with likely mental issues, while Ryulong is little more than an egotistical jackass with delusions of competence far beyond what he actually has who will do horrible shit in exchange for money and power.

He doesn't need the money, based on what his colleagues have said in the past per his source of benefaction (hence why Eastgate makes nothing). He's a zealot about everything, including his hatred of open source alternatives to the software he charges $400 for and spent years ruining after buying it off the creators.

CP: What else would you like to say about Twine?

MB: More broadly speaking, Twine has no model for building a literary economy. Capitalism may be a bad thing, but it’s not our fault, and as artists we need to inhabit a world in which the economy exists. It ought to be possible for people to write seriously even if they’re not independently wealthy; Twine, like to much recent electronic literature, supposes that writing is a hobby.

Funny because Twine is the same shit Zoe Quinn and others (whom he'll put on the highest of pedestals) used to build their stories years ago while he was busy not making software and instead spewing Wikipedia conspiracy theories. Somehow he can have the nerve to talk about the importance of capitalism and "brands" behind publishing yet meanwhile spew useless noise on Twitter with the brand behind his own publishing name, Eastgate.

I've been doing some digging on Mark... he's been at this a while. He was actually on the cutting edge when he started out with Eastgate, he published this game in 1990:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afternoon,_a_story

It was one of the first hypertext games, made with Storyspace, the program he's now selling on his site. Storyspace originally came out in 1987, and the Eastgate website says the company started in 1982! It was created by other people but Mark got involved with publishing it and he's still at it almost 30 years later.

He's one of those ancient computer pioneers who couldn't change with the times. Kind of like the guy at moslo.info, who's been selling a program to slow down games that run too fast in DOS for like 20 years. I wonder if he actually makes a living from Eastgate.

It's more-so he's just lazy. Sat on the success and then failed to actually advance the industry. Spent 5 years saying StorySpace 3.0 was coming "any day" and turned out to be shit software. Also promised mobile versions of popular stories (like Afternoon) that never came to fruition.
 
Last edited:
Didn't Lightbreather have absolutely nothing to do with Gamergate? I suppose I forgot who this is and everything is Gamergate to him.

upload_2017-2-22_19-55-24.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Jubileus
So what does Mark DO with his life outside the #GamerGate obsession?
 
Back