Orbiter Matthew Vickers / @MWV / ViciousVickers / Poor Yorick - Ex-coin merchant, bloodline gunted by Ethan Ralph. Fat cuckold who lost everything by trying to launch warfare against Ethan Ralph. Alleged rapist, proven cuckold, got mental damage from his wife's mean words. Cog paypig.

What caused Vickers' crazy eyes?

  • Tumour

    Votes: 49 3.4%
  • Stroke

    Votes: 201 13.9%
  • Gecko hybrid

    Votes: 396 27.4%
  • Dry eyes

    Votes: 33 2.3%
  • All of the above

    Votes: 766 53.0%

  • Total voters
    1,444
Ralph filing lawsuits is kino. Sadly Vickers is sexually aroused by lawsuits along with his faggot capos like Chris Hibbard who hes having on for another on air group wank session on their gay show.
Maybe Vickers broke some restraining order maybe not I don't really care enough to check but painting Vickers as a litigious and malicious actor to the courts would work a lot better over arguing over restraining orders.
Vickers had some rant last episode where he was touching himself while thinking about more litigious lawsuits and counter suits and sending deranged letters to random people's families.
 
It’s not so much a trap as it’s just giving Gunt enough rope to hang himself.

LOLyers know that Judges hate people who waste the Court’s time. This is one reason why most cases never come to trial. Judges don’t want their dockets overloaded with frivolous bullshit and they don’t want their desks piled high with AI-generated spam they have to read through before rejecting.

If Gunt still had LOLyer Grainger, she’d have kept him from doing what he’s doing here, which is trying to dump a lot of bullshit at the last minute, hoping for a continuance as a result. The Judge isn’t going to like this at all.
I wouldn't expect any sort of proficiency in legal matters from Ralph, however his time in court should have taught him something at this point. He said himself I've spent more time in court than that shyster lawyer Rekeita, and even wetbrain addicts gain a rudimentary understanding of how to not fuck themselves over within the system as they engage with it repeatedly.

Calling a revenge porn conviction a copyright issue is just callous beyond belief, and I think if that is true he said that it really hurts him in court. Beyond that, if you think about it - isn't that him admitting he did release it? How can it be a copyright issue if a third party leaked it Ralph?

Representating yourself is almost always sub-optimal, but fucking hell Ralph you can't just throw out random accusations without doing the bare minimum to link them back to the law, or the legal order that they are breaking. Just saying "oh Vickers is posting on Kiwifarms"... A social media site. It's like complaining you're posting on Twitter Ralph, and then the fact he doesn't provide evidence to back his claims up. It's ludicrous, he'd be better just turning up than counter filing. I think it's the Xannies and booze, plus when you ban and block anyone who shit talks you and move with your battered horse to Mexico the lack of contrary voices would make him fuck up constantly.
 
Dick Masterson used to have a Ball reading Maddox's filings because of how insane they were. If what Vickers says, is true we are about to witness something 100 times more insane that everything Maddox ever filed and I bet you if people points this to Dick he'll find a way to gunt guard the stupid filing. he'll bend over to be spanked live on Air by Ralph, because he'll do anything to prevent Ralph hollering at Marie (or doing barely coherent ramblings untill he passes out more like) while displaying her pictures and Dox in his retarded show.
 
Dick Masterson used to have a Ball reading Maddox's filings because of how insane they were. If what Vickers says, is true we are about to witness something 100 times more insane that everything Maddox ever filed and I bet you if people points this to Dick he'll find a way to gunt guard the stupid filing. he'll bend over to be spanked live on Air by Ralph, because he'll do anything to prevent Ralph hollering at Marie (or doing barely coherent ramblings untill he passes out more like) while displaying her pictures and Dox in his retarded show.
I just wish someone would get the documents and post them here so we don’t have to wait for Vickers before reading them.

Also - the copyright argument. Ralph’s no contest plea can’t be used against him in civil court. However, filings are made under oath. If he effectively admits to releasing the tape…. Can Faith Vickers sue using his filings as evidence he did it and look for damages or whatever?
 
the copyright argument. Ralph’s no contest plea can’t be used against him in civil court. However, filings are made under oath. If he effectively admits to releasing the tape…. Can Faith Vickers sue using his filings as evidence he did it and look for damages or whatever?
Yes. Since he introduced it, it’s now fair game. Shit like this is why it’s a bad idea to attempt to represent yourself in Court.
 
Vickers is absolutely terrified of the written a-bomb Ralph just dropped on his life. The judge will award Ralph the coin business for emotional damages and Faith will be court ordered to participate in a throuple with May and Ralph with Mr.Vickers as their butler and Ralph will be granted another legally binding Xanax prescription.
 
Yes. Since he introduced it, it’s now fair game. Shit like this is why it’s a bad idea to attempt to represent yourself in Court.
Yes and no.

Faith can't use this as a basis to sue both because the statute of limitations in Virginia has already run--two years have already pass since the violation date, and because the conviction would still be inadmissible under the rules of evidence. It would be opening the door on that issue if Faith already had a lawsuit against Ralph for Virginia Code Section 8.01-40.4, and Ralph through testimony referenced his conviction in his defense in Virginia, the conviction would be admissible. It's not opening the door to reference it in an unrelated court proceeding in California.

However, the matter of his conviction would be admissible evidence in determining the nature of certain claims Ralph makes concerning whether Vickers' violates the restraining order and may be information the court uses to assess the claims before it. I am not sure based on the evidence that Ralph really needed to discuss his revenge porn conviction to establish that Vickers may be violating the restraining order, but I could see how it may be necessary to establish Ralph's case-in-chief or provide context for the court to understand the nature of Vickers' interactions with Ralph.

All in all, I don't think it's a fatal error. A questionable decision, definitely, especially since I think it's pretty likely Ralph doesn't have a clear direction for how he's going to present and characterize the evidence. If Vickers' lawyer is at all competent, the lawyer in question could totally rake Ralph over the coals for bringing this up, and Ralph probably isn't prepared to inoculate the judge from the fundamental bad fact that he's a convicted revenge pornographer against the daughter of the man he accuses of violating the restraining order.
 
Yes and no.

Faith can't use this as a basis to sue both because the statute of limitations in Virginia has already run--two years have already pass since the violation date, and because the conviction would still be inadmissible under the rules of evidence. It would be opening the door on that issue if Faith already had a lawsuit against Ralph for Virginia Code Section 8.01-40.4, and Ralph through testimony referenced his conviction in his defense in Virginia, the conviction would be admissible. It's not opening the door to reference it in an unrelated court proceeding in California.

However, the matter of his conviction would be admissible evidence in determining the nature of certain claims Ralph makes concerning whether Vickers' violates the restraining order and may be information the court uses to assess the claims before it. I am not sure based on the evidence that Ralph really needed to discuss his revenge porn conviction to establish that Vickers may be violating the restraining order, but I could see how it may be necessary to establish Ralph's case-in-chief or provide context for the court to understand the nature of Vickers' interactions with Ralph.

All in all, I don't think it's a fatal error. A questionable decision, definitely, especially since I think it's pretty likely Ralph doesn't have a clear direction for how he's going to present and characterize the evidence. If Vickers' lawyer is at all competent, the lawyer in question could totally rake Ralph over the coals for bringing this up, and Ralph probably isn't prepared to inoculate the judge from the fundamental bad fact that he's a convicted revenge pornographer against the daughter of the man he accuses of violating the restraining order.
As incompetent as Ralph's document probably was I really REALLY want this shit to proceed to trial. Ralph arguing in court he's not a convicted sex offender will be absolute fucking Kino and will provide a bountiful corn harvest for so we can survive an entire ice age.
 
this is exactly what i had expected (and predicted). mr. vickers has been ranting for months about the ragepig trying to use vickers' actions to argue and defend his own violations of the restraining orders. he's repeatedly challenged the ragepig to file documents to show cause, and the ragepig has finally done so.

the ragepig had previously tried to argue in court that mr. vickers' actions justify his own actions, and his claims were disregarded by the judge. the ragepig even asked the judge how to file his own documents, and the judge told him that the court could not advise him, and he needed to consult legal counsel. the ragepig argued that he couldn't find counsel, and that was when the judge offered to appoint an attorney.

it's going to be interesting when the ragepig tries to use these filings to delay his own contempt trial, because the judge is going to have to explain to a belligerent and barely sober hog that his complaints are a separate matter for the court to decide. i can only imagine that this will lead to more contempt charges ...
 
the ragepig even asked the judge how to file his own documents, and the judge told him that the court could not advise him
I decided to watch the latest Vickers podcast, and while in the main it was pretty boring the part where they read out the transcript with Ralph asking the judge those questions had me in stitches. I had to do a double take on what was being discussed, his questions in court made him look like a retard. Ah, mah lawyer said it was a free speech issue and that it was uh frivolous, and uh they wanted uh 20 thousand dollars but it's uh frivulous ya 'onour.

Apparently he said to May the other night while drunk on a livestream at a bar that he was planning to ask lawyers about things since they're there. Imagine, some fat redneck retard asking you for legal advice for a separate case they didn't want to fork out for legal representation for as you go about your business. Ralph's so delusional thinking that'd get him anything other than mocked.
 
Apparently he said to May the other night while drunk on a livestream at a bar that he was planning to ask lawyers about things since they're there. Imagine, some fat redneck retard asking you for legal advice for a separate case they didn't want to fork out for legal representation for as you go about your business. Ralph's so delusional thinking that'd get him anything other than mocked.
Lawyers love giving advice for free.
 
Apparently he said to May the other night while drunk on a livestream at a bar that he was planning to ask lawyers about things since they're there. Imagine, some fat redneck retard asking you for legal advice for a separate case they didn't want to fork out for legal representation for as you go about your business. Ralph's so delusional thinking that'd get him anything other than mocked.

if he actually does appear in person (and i think that's a big if, at this point), i have no doubt that the ragepig will try to convince some random attorney to appear with him to ask for a continuance, under the guise that his "new attorney" needs additional time to familiarize themselves with the case. "so, uh, i don't need another luhyur for this frivahlus bullshit, to be hawnest, but i'll give ya $100 to walk in there with me raht now."
 
if he actually does appear in person (and i think that's a big if, at this point), i have no doubt that the ragepig will try to convince some random attorney to appear with him to ask for a continuance, under the guise that his "new attorney" needs additional time to familiarize themselves with the case. "so, uh, i don't need another luhyur for this frivahlus bullshit, to be hawnest, but i'll give ya $100 to walk in there with me raht now."
I'm no expert, since I'm not a lawyer and I've never been to court - but from what was read on the Gunt Family Vickers hour, Ralph has already been given time to find a new lawyer. It was discussed at their last hearing. He has since informed them he would represent himself, and has already made submissions.

So if he did go for this stalling tactic, he would need to explain to the judge why it was, having been given months to sort this out, he only retained a lawyer as of two days ago and therefore requiring a further continuation.
 
So if he did go for this stalling tactic, he would need to explain to the judge why it was, having been given months to sort this out, he only retained a lawyer as of two days ago and therefore requiring a further continuation.

"Yer Honor, if it would *urp* please the Slatterns and A-logs of the court, I would like to submit I could not find another whore lawyer on account of being unconscious the last three months"

All the Ny-quil moonrises and Drowsy.tv were all the ultimate work.
 
I'm no expert, since I'm not a lawyer and I've never been to court - but from what was read on the Gunt Family Vickers hour, Ralph has already been given time to find a new lawyer. It was discussed at their last hearing. He has since informed them he would represent himself, and has already made submissions.

So if he did go for this stalling tactic, he would need to explain to the judge why it was, having been given months to sort this out, he only retained a lawyer as of two days ago and therefore requiring a further continuation.

oh, it will never happen. not only would it be an ethical violation for any attorney to participate in such a ruse, but it would also be the day of the hearing, when any attorney who is present in the courthouse would be there for other matters relating to their paying clients.

but he's a stupid, sleazy asshole, who assumes that everyone else is also a stupid, sleazy asshole, so i have no doubt that the ragepig would at least try to swindle an officer of the court.
 
"Yer Honor, if it would *urp* please the Slatterns and A-logs of the court, I would like to submit I could not find another whore lawyer on account of being unconscious the last three months"
Too lazy to quote all the killer posts ITT but holy shit you broke dicks are bringing your A-game on this one. I couldn’t be more excited for 3/17 if I were Vickers (a fat thirsty Ralphatwin) himself.
 
Screenshot_20230314-211931~2.png
Anyone know what this fat retard is talking about now?

It's so funny how despite being repeatedly told these are separate matters he just has to co-mingle all of his contempt cases.
 
Back