Orbiter Matthew Vickers / @MWV / ViciousVickers / Poor Yorick - Ex-coin merchant, bloodline gunted by Ethan Ralph. Fat cuckold who lost everything by trying to launch warfare against Ethan Ralph. Alleged rapist, proven cuckold, got mental damage from his wife's mean words. Cog paypig.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What caused Vickers' crazy eyes?

  • Tumour

    Votes: 49 3.4%
  • Stroke

    Votes: 201 13.9%
  • Gecko hybrid

    Votes: 396 27.4%
  • Dry eyes

    Votes: 33 2.3%
  • All of the above

    Votes: 766 53.0%

  • Total voters
    1,444
where are the TalkingParents logs?
That's the app he and Faith have to correspond on about Xander. The leak was that at the same time he was trying to raise money for a lawyer to "fight for his son," he was saying to Faith please get your dad to agree to sign /I just want to go away.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Procrastinhater
That's the app he and Faith have to correspond on about Xander. The leak was that at the same time he was trying to raise money for a lawyer to "fight for his son," he was saying to Faith please get your dad to agree to sign /I just want to go away.
Yeah. I've seen screenshots of the messages that Vickers claimed "violated the use" of it from his retarded filing. Just surprised they haven't dropped anywhere here.
 
Yeah. I've seen screenshots of the messages that Vickers claimed "violated the use" of it from his retarded filing. Just surprised they haven't dropped anywhere here.
I thought I'd seen it in two different threads here, but was also surprised no one really picked it up.
 
Vickers stated in his court documents that Ralph psychologically broke him.
And that was before Ralph's total destruction of Nick Fuentes/America First and subsequent redemption arc. You just know Vickers is seething. "That should be me who people on Kiwi Farms are cheering, not Ethan Ralph!"
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Lmao link?

vickers.PNG
 
Vickers is an absolute retard to commit perjury on court documents to that extent and continue to run his mouth on his gay podcast and poke the pig every chance he gets on Twitter, providing mountains of evidence that he falsified his claims.
His continuing actions simply do not reflect the man he is claiming to be on those documents, a man so buck broken by Ralph he suffered "permanent damage to his nerves and prolonged disability" blah blah would not continue to harrass the guy who did that to them, from what he's claiming on those docs, whispering "Ethan Ralph" in Vickerses ear should cause him to have a panic attack.
He's flat out lied on his claims and I wish Ralph had a competent lawyer, because any decent lawyer would take those documents, and use the very public and documented record of fuckery and maliciousness on Vickerses part to fucking wreck his shit.
Some Judges really hate having their time wasted by this sort of shit, a decent lawyer would have little trouble having Vickerses case dismissed and him declared vexatious, and a Judge pissed off too much by being time wasted by this pair of White Trash retards would probably have them both hit with contempt of court, certainly the Coin Man for falsification on court documents.
 
Something I notice here is an attempt to plead IIED. I think everyone here already knows that claim is dead on arrival, but I don't think it's even adequately pled. IIED requires "extreme and outrageous conduct" and Vickers isn't pleading that. He's just reiterating his claim that Ralph defamed him, already covered in the defamation part of the case.

I think that's probably SLAPPable.

Maybe he alleges that earlier in the complaint but I'm not seeing it here.

Then he pleads an "information and belief" factual statement about his so-called injury, not the medical standard he'd actually need to prove. Is Spectree responsible for this bullshit?
Vickers is an absolute retard to commit perjury on court documents to that extent and continue to run his mouth on his gay podcast and poke the pig every chance he gets on Twitter, providing mountains of evidence that he falsified his claims.
Unless he's actually verified the complaint (and it doesn't look like this is the case), it's probably not perjury. "Information and belief" is a pretty low standard.

That doesn't mean it isn't sanctionably frivolous. At least the defamation claim might hold up, at least if prosecuted by someone who isn't an absolute imbecile like Vickers (with or without Spectree).
 
You people seem shocked that vickers would make his buck breaking public, and yet:
Once again thank you JackoVerde for sending me this
View attachment 5222785
Fucking lmao "the Swine Master" you just made me remember one of William Hope Hodgsons Carnaki stories
Hodgson was an early 20th Century Pulp novelist who wrote for Weird Tales, the same magazine Lovecraft and Robert E Howard wrote for, Carnaki was recurring character, a Ghost Hunter and Paranormal Investigator
he wrote a story called "The Hog" where Carnaki takes a case to help a guy who is basically the Vickers that the coin man pretends to be in these documents, having repeated nightmares about some horrible Pig creature that hollers at him and tries to drag him into an abyss. At one point Carnaki calls it "the Swine Master of Monstrosity" and I thought at the time "it's Ralph!" I'd forgotten all about it until now.
 
Last edited:
Something I notice here is an attempt to plead IIED. I think everyone here already knows that claim is dead on arrival, but I don't think it's even adequately pled. IIED requires "extreme and outrageous conduct" and Vickers isn't pleading that. He's just reiterating his claim that Ralph defamed him, already covered in the defamation part of the case.

I think that's probably SLAPPable.

Maybe he alleges that earlier in the complaint but I'm not seeing it here.

Then he pleads an "information and belief" factual statement about his so-called injury, not the medical standard he'd actually need to prove. Is Spectree responsible for this bullshit?
Just a small correction. A plaintiff (Vickers, in this case) never PLEADS, that’s what a defendant (Ralph, in this case) does. A plaintiff is the one on the offensive, they are the ACCUSER, so they don’t have to PLEAD to anything, they are the ones who are ALLEGING wrongdoing by the defendant and asking for compensation as a result of that alleged wrongdoing.

So, in this case, Vickers is alleging Ralph defamed him and is suing him for it.
 
Just a small correction. A plaintiff (Vickers, in this case) never PLEADS, that’s what a defendant (Ralph, in this case) does. A plaintiff is the one on the offensive, they are the ACCUSER, so they don’t have to PLEAD to anything, they are the ones who are ALLEGING wrongdoing by the defendant and asking for compensation as a result of that alleged wrongdoing.

So, in this case, Vickers is alleging Ralph defamed him and is suing him for it.
That's completely wrong. A pleading is any legal document setting out claims, arguments, factual statements, or anything else. A complaint or petition is the operative pleading in the case by the plaintiff.

I'm not sure where you got that idea but it's complete bullshit.
 
Just a small correction. A plaintiff (Vickers, in this case) never PLEADS, that’s what a defendant (Ralph, in this case) does. A plaintiff is the one on the offensive, they are the ACCUSER, so they don’t have to PLEAD to anything, they are the ones who are ALLEGING wrongdoing by the defendant and asking for compensation as a result of that alleged wrongdoing.

So, in this case, Vickers is alleging Ralph defamed him and is suing him for it.
Early - prior to discovery - filings are "pleadings."


You are incorrect.
 
Mr. Vickers, if you are reading this thread I want you to know one thing: you're a big fat retard and your daughter is a fat sack of doody and you suck and your wife is very, very fat and also you're gay and if I ever see you in person in real life I'm going to take your stupid camo hat off of your melon and throw it on the ground and kick it around until it gets all dirty and fucked up.
 
That's completely wrong. A pleading is any legal document setting out claims, arguments, factual statements, or anything else. A complaint or petition is the operative pleading in the case by the plaintiff.

I'm not sure where you got that idea but it's complete bullshit.
I’m not sure where you got yours, either, but I’ve never heard of any plaintiff PLEADING to anything because there are no charges being brought against them, so they’d have nothing to plead. I’ve literally never seen a single legal document or article that refers to a plaintiff pleading to anything, but by all means, feel free to show me otherwise.
 
Back