Orbiter Matthew Vickers / @MWV / ViciousVickers / Poor Yorick - Ex-coin merchant, bloodline gunted by Ethan Ralph. Fat cuckold who lost everything by trying to launch warfare against Ethan Ralph. Alleged rapist, proven cuckold, got mental damage from his wife's mean words. Cog paypig.

What caused Vickers' crazy eyes?

  • Tumour

    Votes: 49 3.4%
  • Stroke

    Votes: 201 13.9%
  • Gecko hybrid

    Votes: 396 27.4%
  • Dry eyes

    Votes: 33 2.3%
  • All of the above

    Votes: 766 53.0%

  • Total voters
    1,444
Idk if you should call your complaint boiler plate. It makes it seem less genuine at least to someone ignorant of the law and idk how much you're supposed to say that part out loud where a judge can see it
"I'll have you know that I copy/pasted that from a real lawsuit dang you!"

vickers.png
 
What do you think the worst thing about Vickers is?

For me, it's that he's not only a total failure of a parent to his own kids, it's that he hypocritically parades his grandson around as some kind of spite trophy and fails at every attempt to damage Ralph (both in the legal realm and life in general).

He might actually have some kind of humiliation fetish.

And that's not even considering the sexual abuse accusations, which are so far unproven but may have some element of truth to them.

Okay, your turn.
He talks like a fag too.
 
I initially thought that Xander living with the Vickers was the best option for him growing up. But the fact that he uses grandson as a pawn in e drama and has Xander do visitations with internet weirdos like genius anus I'm beginning to realize I was wrong.

Basically Vickers is a clout hungry faggot who's now suffering the curse of those who get involved with the pig demon. Financial, social, mental and physical ruin.
 
I love how he announces his retarded plan giving Ralph plenty of time to hide his contacts. Which won't even be an issue to begin with because a judge isn't going to force him to turn over twitter DMs.

Vickers is also too fat too retarded and too poor to afford a proper discovery process. I'm also pretty sure just a few months ago he told a person on twitter that he was adding them to discovery in his lolsuit because he kept trying to follow him on twitter, so it seems like his essays on xwitter are bullshit.
 
Last edited:
Holy fucking autism batman. I think he is now saying he isn't suing the John Does and its a place holder for anyone Ralph throws under the bus which is boiler plate.
I aint some lawfag but I gotta feeling if some dude hits me with their car I would be suing them not them and 50 other randoms, but I am sure Vickers knows best.
1692914012000.png

1692914046888.png
Text version of the long post



The DOES 1-50 is copy and paste, boiler plate legal language that you will find on practically any complaint for damages in CA. There are variations (1-10, 1-100, 1-10, 1-25) that are ultimately meaningless. You will find them everywhere. I made a post to that effect earlier. So far as discovery...let's consider that. The specific defamatory acts that Ralph is being sued for are listed in paragraphs 8, 9, and 10 on the complaint. The version
@SekturKing
posted appears to be a true and accurate copy. Only those complaints are a part of the suit and nothing outside of the specific actions listed in those paragraphs. Ralph has already admitted to making the statements, but contends that he did not make the statements out of malice, or thought they were otherwise true. Think about it. Since I can already prove that the statements Ralph made are untrue, why in the sweet shit would I want to go digging into anything? My discovery process will most likely be limited to simple interrogatories before moving to a trial, before it takes that long. In reality, Ralph will be the one who would need to produce communications to prove that he had reason to believe what he said was true, or that what he said was not malicious. There is no benefit or reason for me to get his private communications, and even if I tried, he'd be able to quash such a request easily because such a request would only go to benefit his case...not mine. As such, the only person in the suit to benefit from showing private communications would be Ralph, as part of his affirmative defense(s). But those communications will not cut it...he'd have to provide a witness to give testimony. I don't see that happening, do you? The anonymity of a-logs and Gunt Guard alike HELP me in this case, not Ralph. I have zero incentive to bring anyone else into it. As for any reference to EsoShaggy, that guy is a raging fucktard. But I stopped using Poast quite a bit before I ever filed the lawsuit. I've no intention of calling you an idiot, because at least you were trying to reason through it. In any case, at some level, it doesn't matter. Nothing said online will stop how the case will proceed, and at the end of it, when none of the crazy shit
@SekturKing
is saying actually happens. There is one very important factor to support my (true) narratives...but that would be stupid to share and tip my hand to opposition.
So in conclusion Vickers


Edit: Vickers I realize your reading this and I should give you something to help you out. Here you go please call one of these people and get some help to get over how the Ralphmale raped your sensitiveness little bum that you had to spend all day everyday for the past 3 years talking about him.
 
Last edited:
It's like the Hills Have Eyes - gay Commiefornian Edition.
View attachment 5293121
Complaints about Vickerses disgusting teeth and his shady business practices date back years.
I'm most appalled by the use of "generally".
This would imply several visits and Vickers being in that state for the majority of them.
🤮🤮🤮
 
essay1.png
It seems like the variations have a lot of meaning and that meaning is kind of obvious to anyone whose last name isn't Vickers.

If you list John Does 1-10, that must mean you are trying to reserve the ability to sue up to 10 additional people.

Vickers has decided to attempt to reserve the right to sue up to 50 additional people.

This maneuver doesn't make any sense unless he intends to go digging for dirt in discovery.

essay2.png
Vickers has this totally backwards. Actual malice is something that he must prove, assuming he is a public figure of some sort (and it's hard to argue that @MWV has not done everything in his power to make himself a public figure, with his attempt to turn his family into the scuffed white trash version of the Kardashians).

It's worth noting that this is completely and totally different to the spin that they urgently sent to Jim. You may recall that this statement was sent to Jim:
jim_statement.png

Vickers' imbecilic sidekick told Jim explicitly that the point of the procedural trick was to save space on the lawsuit in case Vickers, after discovery had taken place, decided he wanted to add anons who had been found to have been in contact with Ethan Ralph. Anus man even listed a specific anonymous account as someone that they hoped to be able to unmask and sue.

The imbecile is now on cleanup duty trying to clean up his statement now that the Team V party line is that they don't actually want to conduct discovery at all because Vickers doesn't understand what he has to prove.

Maybe Vickers threatened Anus man that he wouldn't let him spend any more time with a toddler unless he cleaned up his mess.

cleanup.pngcleanup2.png
(Archive, post 1 | Archive, post 2)
 
If you list John Does 1-10, that must mean you are trying to reserve the ability to sue up to 10 additional people.

Vickers has decided to attempt to reserve the right to sue up to 50 additional people.
He's completely full of bullshit about this being routine. It's solely used for when you know of specific tortfeasors but merely don't know their identity.

This fat toothless faggot hasn't bothered to allege these imaginary Doe defendants even did anything specific.
 
Back