Mega Rad Gun Thread

big pauper said:
I will never buy a striker fired handgun. you can pry my brazilian nigger blaster out of my cold dead hands
Click to expand...

I'm not a fan of striker fired pistols either. About the only one I could see myself buying is the metal framed Walther or an HK P7. The rest just really don't blow my skirt up. Give me my hammer fired pistols any day of the week, especially if they are single action like a 1911/2011 or a BHP.
 
The Dude said:
I'm not a fan of striker fired pistols either. About the only one I could see myself buying is the metal framed Walther or an HK P7. The rest just really don't blow my skirt up. Give me my hammer fired pistols any day of the week, especially if they are single action like a 1911/2011 or a BHP.
Click to expand...
I can't go back to carrying a striker fired gun after shooting the C2. The flat trigger is such a cheat code. The only other handguns I enjoy firing are my polished trigger revolvers.
 
Can anyone explain to me how the Huxwrx locking collar on their gen 2 hub adapter works? It's included on their Black Magic which is the suppressor paired with the SOLGW MK1 / CAR for SOCOM. I looked up the manual for it and not only did it not explain anything it didn't even give a clear view of any locking mechanism, I initially thought it was supposed to be a Collet system that locks over the rear of the muzzle device but the manual diagrams disproved that.
I would highly appreciate a short video if possible of the locking mechanism being actuated
Also apparently the Black Magic is 1.8in OD
1765377070295.jpeg

Aftermarket PKM charging handle
1765377470900.jpeg

Owen gun with jungle mags
1765377504009.jpeg

Some degen knocked over a liquor store with an underhammer percussion pistol
1765377608701.jpeg

Handmade imitation C-96 from 1936
1765377752525.jpeg

A guy is working on an adaptation to super safeties to have them work in standard Stribog lowers as opposed to only aftermarket ones
1765377975429.jpeg



Big aah suppressor (I think this was made by LaFrance)
1765378052589.jpeg

Custom ukrainian RPD
1765378081376.jpeg

B&T once offered Japan suppressor for their type 89 rifles, interestingly one of the offered mounting solutions was a "Sandiwch" style
1765378409059.jpeg

1765378524035.jpeg

Thermal module for XM-157, from a recent visit by the Secretary of the Army to PEO Soldier
1765381715175.png
1765381731213.jpeg

Jeet P365 in .32 ACP
1765381793940.jpeg
1765381821124.jpeg

Chinese Type 701 rifle
1765392719338.jpeg
1765392738501.jpeg
1765392764983.jpeg

"The bolt and bolt carrier of the 701 Rifle is similar to an AK bolt and bolt carrier but without a gas piston. The bolt carrier is in contact with the bolt when locked, and there is a small gap (0.9 - 1.13mm which is about 1/32 - 3/64 inches) between the locking lugs on the bolt and the locking lugs on the trunnion. When the gun fires, gas pressure pushes the case and the bolt back 0.9 - 1.13mm, which then pushes on the bolt carrier and gives it enough energy to unlock the bolt and cycle everything.

There are three main problems with this design
-Since the case starts to move back at high pressure, the chamber has to be fluted, which makes for a dirty running gun, kind of like delayed blowback H&K rifle
-The locking surfaces are under a significant amount of force, which had to be addressed by increasing the locking surface
-The bolt and/or the bolt carrier could bounce when closing, and since this operating system depends on the bolt and bolt carrier being in contact with each other, the full-auto rpm is unstable from time to time."


If you ever really wanted a KAC revolver rifle, get a Nagant and give a gunsmith a couple grand and two soon to be free tax stamps


 
The Dude said:
I personally don't understand the appeal of most Russian weapons. It could be my experience years back building semi-auto AKs has soured my view of Russian weapons and made me biased, but I just don't really get it. Like, I can see the appeal of the Pecheneg and bullpup PKM, the SVU, the AN-94, and some of the Russian SMGs. And some of their latest stuff is kind of interesting, especially the ones where they've tried to move away from just iterating on old Soviet designs. But most of their other individual weapons just aren't interesting to me, especially Kalashnikov rifles and Makarov pistols, and I just can't feature why so many people go ga-ga over them. I'd much rather have Western weapons.
Click to expand...
As someone who likes Russian arms, it's partially aesthetic, partially the rugged nature of them, and partly just the foreign cool factor. I will admit that the AR is the superior platform overall, objectively speaking, however, I shoot my AK way more and have put way more love into it. Solid steel and wood are nice, and I like the heft and solidity of them in my hand compared to the objectively better, but lightweight and almost "toy" feeling of many comparable Western arms, especially a standard AR. I also like that field stripping and cleaning things like an AK is straightforward and made for retards, while it's fairly easy to lose an AR part. I own lots of Western arms, but I definitely am a bit of a Soviet arms fanboy. I also think a lot of other Russian arms fans are commie fags who only really like them because muh stalin and "real communism hasn't been tried" types of mindset, and yes I hate them too.

Also, I do not think AKs are that expensive for good ones. Zastava makes good AKs for about a grand, and while you might balk at the price, I don't think that's bad for a quality steel and wood firearm today.
 
AGPinochet said:
View attachment 8259531

You know it's kind of weird that there are two wealthy brown autistic trannies into guns, anime and crossdressing as a lifestyle.
Click to expand...
Based on what ive seen on reddit theres far more than just two.
I don't know if we have a thread on it anywhere but r/transguns exists and as usual there's dumbasses who can't stop bringing up their sexual shit on r/liberalgunowners which we all know of.
There's probably more lolcow milk out there but my memory has gone bad so I can't really remember
 
Fount of BadSpeak said:
it's partially aesthetic, partially the rugged nature of them, and partly just the foreign cool factor
Click to expand...
It's really hard to beat setting your rifle against a downed tree seeing snow collect on stamped steel and laminated wood, I agree with that. It's like wanting a log cabin in the woods, it's not optimal but damn.
 
Fount of BadSpeak said:
just the foreign cool factor. I will admit that the AR is the superior platform overall, objectively speaking, however, I shoot my AK way more and have put way more love into it. Solid steel and wood are nice, and I like the heft and solidity of them in my hand compared to the objectively better, but lightweight and almost "toy" feeling of many comparable Western arms, especially a standard AR. I also like that field stripping and cleaning things like an AK is straightforward and made for retards, while it's fairly easy to lose an AR part.
Also, I do not think AKs are that expensive for good ones. Zastava makes good AKs for about a grand, and while you might balk at the price, I don't think that's bad for a quality steel and wood firearm today.
Click to expand...
That heavy feeling does come from better durability. Stamped AKs can last near to 100,000 rounds without too many major breakages and milled AKs will last forever (assuming both have chromed bores). Just ask Battlefield Vegas. I'm not trying to say the AR is bad or anything but each platform has its advantages & disadvantages because they were clearly made for different purposes in mind. AK was focused on pumping out long-lasting low maitenance minute of man guns from factories with well set up stamping machines, as consistent with Soviet doctrine. AR was focused on making a refined, low recoil, accurate with tight tolerances rifle from smaller installations with milling machines, as consistent with US rifleman tradition (although it of course had that 1950s spacegun influence which is why you get aluminum and don't get wood furniture). Both are good platforms and there's a reason that both are still seeing service 70-80 years after their invention & adoption.
Fount of BadSpeak said:
I also think a lot of other Russian arms fans are commie fags who only really like them because muh stalin and "real communism hasn't been tried" types of mindset, and yes I hate them too.
Click to expand...
ikr
 
AGPinochet said:
Thermal module for XM-157, from a recent visit by the Secretary of the Army to PEO Soldier
Click to expand...
How to make an XM-157 cost $20,000....
AGPinochet said:
Jeet P365 in .32 ACP
Click to expand...
NGL that actually looks pretty good and fun fact, .32 ACP is the default civilian center fire caliber in India due to literal 19th century gun laws they have.

It's also all metal and will probably cost over $1,000 equivalent (lmao)
Fount of BadSpeak said:
Also, I do not think AKs are that expensive for good ones. Zastava makes good AKs for about a grand, and while you might balk at the price, I don't think that's bad for a quality steel and wood firearm today.
Click to expand...
Plus the Jack rifles from WPB are great and the WASRS run a ok (they just look cheap as shit)

WASR is $800-$850 and the Jack is dead on $1000-$1100 depending on how Fancy you like your wood.
pro drivor said:
I'm not trying to say the AR is bad or anything but each platform has its advantages & disadvantages because they were clearly made for different purposes in mind. AK was focused on pumping out long-lasting low maitenance minute of man guns from factories with well set up stamping machines, as consistent with Soviet doctrine. AR was focused on making a refined, low recoil, accurate with tight tolerances rifle from smaller installations with milling machines, as consistent with US rifleman tradition
Click to expand...
Plus the AK is literally a decade older and literally missed ~10-12 years of Western materials sciences and engineering/tooling advancements.

People forget that the AK was designed from roughly 1946-1947 and entered service in 1948.

The M-16 didn't enter service until 1965 and the AR-10 didn't get finished until about 1958.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom