So earlier this month the UK passed a law that will ban the sale of tobacco to anyone born after 2008. This means that when someone born in 2009 turns 18, the tobacco purchasing age will be 19, when they turn 19 it will be 20, and so on, meaning they will never be legally sold cigarettes.
I'm wondering: Is this something that the anti-gun crowd might take inspiration from? It's sneaky because it's not
technically a ban, the legal age to buy would just be raised by one year every year until everyone is "underage".
I also don't think them trying this is as unlikely as you might think, as
a similar tobacco purchasing ban was recently upheld as lawful in Massachusetts. What would happen if, say, California tried to implement a similar ban for guns? Having legal age limits to purchase firearms (i.e 18 for rifles and shotguns and 21 for handguns) isn't considered to be in violation of the second amendment, so could a perpetual increase in the legal age to purchase stand up in court?
I could also see them trying this because it won't stop anyone who can currently legally buy guns from continuing to do so, and it's much easier to sell a ban that will stop other people from doing things than a ban that would apply to everyone.