Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Guys I have a really important question

Should I buy an H&K USP Elite in .45 ACP
View attachment 6059276
It's pretty cool and I like it a little.

Or should I buy a Lorcin L-22
View attachment 6059278
They stopped making them so I figure I should get on the bandwagon early.

I can only get one, so that's why it's really really important.
Don't be a retard and buy the usp. how is this even a question, you would only prefer the Lorcin if you're going to kill somebody and throw that gun away or if you're some sort of negro. The ring of fire guns are not worth collecting just because there will always be companies making cheap guns.
 
Monday my latest poor financial decision will be complete, can't wait
 
I mean out of the many reasons to get a Beretta 92, that is a good one. Really I've just always liked the 92. All steel, all black, one of the OG wonder 9s still in production, based on the Walther, the looks, 17 rounds for plenty of firepower which includes +p, the US used it for over 30 years, I could go on.
View attachment 6059161
It'll take a while but I definitely could. The base model would probably be plenty in my price range tbh.

Edit: still thinking about a Model 10.
View attachment 6059213
It would depend on price honestly. With tax a base model Beretta 92 is 770 in my area currently at Sportsmans Warehouse, which is a pretty good price gauge I've found. I've already invested in 38 Special, so in terms of logistics, I wouldn't be changing all that much. But it has to be a GOOD price for a Model 10. Otherwise I'm going for the Beretta.
I would say to go with the Beretta 92 out of practicality. Have the convenience of a repeating action, higher capacity, and still have that old world all steel construction.
 
If the question is "Should I buy a Heckler & Koch or this other gun/thing?" the answer is always, ALWAYS buy the H&K.
 
Guys I have a really important question

Should I buy an H&K USP Elite in .45 ACP
View attachment 6059276
It's pretty cool and I like it a little.

Or should I buy a Lorcin L-22
View attachment 6059278
They stopped making them so I figure I should get on the bandwagon early.

I can only get one, so that's why it's really really important.
Elite. All the fucking way. Not even a question.
If you want something like the Lorcin, find a Galesi-Brescia .22 Ladyfinger. I found one under the floorboards here and fixed it up, thing is fucking awesome. All steel, like 5 parts. Really only have FTF issues when I keep running it without cleaning. And not to mention, it's tiny. But has enough beef you could tie the thing to a string and use it as a bludgeoning tool. Can find em everywhere for $100-250 used.
 

Attachments

  • galesi no exif.jpg
    galesi no exif.jpg
    139.6 KB · Views: 29
Or should I buy a Lorcin L-22
View attachment 6059278
They stopped making them so I figure I should get on the bandwagon early.

I can only get one, so that's why it's really really important.
I like how Lorcins look, I like a lot of the Saturday Night Special aesthetics. If I ever find an L380, or a Raven locally for cheap in reasonably condition I'll get it as a paperweight.
 
old world all steel construction.
the 92 has an aluminum alloy frame almost since inception. the Vertec framed pistols (92X, et c) and specific models like the Billenium, Centennial, and 92 FS Fusion are steel framed, and Wilson Combat used to make a steel frame 92G as well. Also, all the "inox" Beretta's are steel framed.
 
Last edited:
Alright so I've finally figured out what I want for my minimalist collection. My Glock 19 is for home defense and my Smith and Wesson 637 is for personal defense. But I realized that I also want something with a bit more range and accuracy. HOWEVER, I also don't want something that needs a ton of magazines and other accessories because those take up space that I don't have to spare. Not really interested in shotguns either because of the ammo bulk.

I'm still not sure about getting the Ruger PC Carbine. Other options I'm considering are a Rossi or Henry lever action .357 but no local stores sell them and I don't want to do the online order song and dance again. Shipping to my area is really slow for some reason but if it's the best option, I'll do it.

The pawn shop near me also had a couple of interesting rifles. They have a Yugo SKS for $750 IIRC and an Ishapore L2 (basically a 7.62 Indian Lee-Enfield) for $700.
If you’re not worried about ballistic capabilities compared to a .357 then a Ruger PC carbine is a neat home defense option. I have one, and it’s neat. The magpul backpacker stock for it is pretty interesting (if you don’t mind paying $120 for a 2-piece stock), and it makes it even more easy to store/stow it considering the carbine is a takedown as-is.

If you have any suppressors it comes with a threaded barrel w/ thread protector screwed on from the factory, which is nice. The firing mechanism is a little bulky and some would say primitive but I’ve been able to get great groupings out of it. If you buy one, go to Tandemkross and check out the upgrades they sell for it, they’re dirt cheap. I put in a harder/better-machined extractor, and an “upgraded”/thicker recoil pad for the inside of the receiver where the rear of the bolt slams home during cycling. They also sell aftermarket trigger shoes and charging handles but I’m not trying to get too fancy with it.
 
Finding cheap .223/5.56 ammo however
i buy a lot of ammunition for professional and personal use and to be honest, standardizing on M193 and buying it in bulk is pretty much the way to go imho. all of my 5.56mm fighting rifles, outside of some that prefer boutique loads, can reliably and safely use M193 and hit minute of man out to several hundred meters. for "plinking", 9mm is getting cheap again, and old ammunition is cycled out as target practice regularly, making keeping a separate SKU for cheap blasting not worth the logistics hassle.

if you have .223 Remington only rifles that can't safely use 5.56mm NATO, also consider nabbing PMC Bronze .223 - it's fairly gentle on older .223-only actions and is a bit lighter on the wallet too.
 
On the plus side, you can laugh at people buying 7.62x39
I can't because I used to be one. There's so many cool AK's out there that are now totally impractical to shoot.
i buy a lot of ammunition for professional and personal use and to be honest, standardizing on M193 and buying it in bulk is pretty much the way to go imho. if you have .223 Remington only rifles that can't safely use 5.56mm NATO, also consider nabbing PMC Bronze .223 - it's fairly gentle on older .223-only actions and is a bit lighter on the wallet too.
I've noticed that Xtac is also pretty cheap for brass case ammo.
 
Got everything submitted for my suppressor. So any time from two days to a month and I should have it.
I'm considering getting one myself but I have other things going on right now, plus that paperwork and wait time is a bitch and a half where I am.
May be possible to use thin kevlar sheeting to protect sensitive components. Or just integrate 3d printed armor into the 3d printed frame/chassis of the drone, can just add a semi-hollow "tubulane" armored box to hold components.

See: https://hackaday.com/2019/11/20/university-makes-bulletproof-3d-prints/
Having the interior structure be more mesh-like with gaps inside will make it lighter than solid armor and will dissipate energy from impacts more effectively. Considering it needs protection mostly from bird shot and shrapnel, this may work. Maybe have an outer skin of thin kevlar to absorb initial impact or something.
Rather ironic that the idea of making bulletproof materials via 3D printing is being floated when their detractors fear that people will create firearms with them.
i buy a lot of ammunition for professional and personal use and to be honest, standardizing on M193 and buying it in bulk is pretty much the way to go imho. all of my 5.56mm fighting rifles, outside of some that prefer boutique loads, can reliably and safely use M193 and hit minute of man out to several hundred meters. for "plinking", 9mm is getting cheap again, and old ammunition is cycled out as target practice regularly, making keeping a separate SKU for cheap blasting not worth the logistics hassle.

if you have .223 Remington only rifles that can't safely use 5.56mm NATO, also consider nabbing PMC Bronze .223 - it's fairly gentle on older .223-only actions and is a bit lighter on the wallet too.
Honestly I was against getting an AR because "everyone else has them" but I do understand the concept of standardization to a point. I still personally prefer other models but I must concede that anyone looking to buy or build something might want to consider something that accepts AR components.
 
Last edited:
but I must concede that anyone looking to buy or build something might want to consider something that accepts AR components.
don't let your dreams be dreams. M193 runs pretty good in an HK33 or FNC. i've been rocking an HK33KA3 for many years interchangeably with a Colt Commando, and as long as you monitor bolt gap and use the right locking piece, it runs like a top. there's some good modernized furniture available too if you're into it, polymer mags, et c.
 
Back
Top Bottom