Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Pretend To Imagine said:
People love to invest their egos into tools, and then argue why their chosen tool is supposedly better.

What really matters is: are your skills and equipment up to the task of your supposed use case.

Skills > Gear.

Most people I’ve met that unprompted want to tell me why XYZ is so much better don’t have a high level of skill.
Click to expand...
We're just having fun with some gun banter, no need to get judgmental.
 
Falcos_Commisar said:
the AK is a SHIT platform to mount optics to,
Click to expand...
nah man. it might not be as good as the ar, but i have a red dot with a mag on mine and i had no problem attaching it. you literally just slide the side mounting rail onto the gun, lock it, then you have a picatiny rail for your optics. never once had any issue adding optics to my ak. if yours does have a side rail, that can be an issue, but otherwise, nah i never got anyone who tries to say how difficult it is to add optics to the ak.
 
Neo-Nazi Rich Evans said:
nah man. it might not be as good as the ar, but i have a red dot with a mag on mine and i had no problem attaching it. you literally just slide the side mounting rail onto the gun, lock it, then you have a picatiny rail for your optics. never once had any issue adding optics to my ak. if yours does have a side rail, that can be an issue, but otherwise, nah i never got anyone who tries to say how difficult it is to add optics to the ak.
Click to expand...
Any system that can mount an optic as big as the gun itself is fine by me.

1724449262225.png

I guess the only issue is it can't really keep a precise zero when you have to remove it to take it off for cleaning, but who does long range precision shooting with an AK?
 
Neo-Nazi Rich Evans said:
nah man. it might not be as good as the ar, but i have a red dot with a mag on mine and i had no problem attaching it. you literally just slide the side mounting rail onto the gun, lock it, then you have a picatiny rail for your optics. never once had any issue adding optics to my ak. if yours does have a side rail, that can be an issue, but otherwise, nah i never got anyone who tries to say how difficult it is to add optics to the ak.
Click to expand...
Compared to literally any other platform, it's a shit way of doing it. Needing an extra piece of kit to properly mount optics is not ideal. It adds weight, it adds bulk. It adds bore offset (because you want to be able to disassemble that rifle as well). No one is saying you can't make an AK functionally the same as an AR with optics and accessories. It's just a bigger pain in the ass to do it, thus shit.
 
FamicomGorby said:
Also update to my pistol search, I decided to go with a CZ Shadow 2 Compact. Roughly the same size as a Hi-Power, grip angle is almost the same, and optic ready. I did have to drop SAO and factory threaded barrel from my list but I since it's a frame safety model I can just use in SA exclusively and I'll pick up a threaded barrel for it. Got an RMR mounted on it so I'll shoot it this weekend.
Click to expand...
Hell yeah that is a NICE handgun
 
EggImpregnator said:
I might as well bend over and pull my pants down so i can raped to death".
Click to expand...
Bro you're already getting raped to death buying 7.62 these days.

For home defense I'd get the most Gucci hunting or defense ammo I can get and use that, since blowing 5 bucks at a nig is the least of your concerns. Comparing X39 to 5.56 is all fine and good, but it's always with FMJs or whatever, never ammo that you'd actually use in your house or in SHTF if you could help it. You can get defense or hunting 762, but the 5.56 has more and better options.

@Foley what makes 762 a better suppressor host? It basically is like a 70 y/o .300 BLK but with less bullet choices.
I thought that the smaller diameter the better, as that lets less gas or noise out of the can, why shotgun cans aren't very impressive
 
Last edited:
SHIGGSHOGG said:
@Foley what makes 762 a better suppressor host? It basically is like a 70 y/o .300 BLK but with less bullet choices.
I thought that the smaller diameter the better, as that lets less gas or noise out of the can, why shotgun cans aren't very impressive
Click to expand...
Because there is actually subsonic 7.62x39 ammunition, can't do that with a high velocity 5.56 or 5.45. How relevant is this? Well, basically every SOF unit in the world still prefers the smaller caliber.

.300 BLK is probably the better cartridge technically, but I was kinda looking at it from 7.62x39 vs 5.56 angle.
 
Troon_Patrol said:
Fun fact: everyone hates the colt model 80 for it's fagtastical overly complicated firing assembly promoting safety for a problem that never really existed but, did you know it's extra parts prevents slide milling for a nice flat plain for a Holosun?
Click to expand...

It's literally three parts you dumb nigger. Plunger, plunger spring, and actuator.

Pretty much the standard FPS setup found on any proper carry gun (Which excludes every single 1911 that lacks one, lul).

The 1911 is the original "drop and pop" gun.

Edit:

Pro Tip: A stronger spring and titanium does NOT make the 1911 drop safe, it only increases the height from which you can drop it. 1911's dropped on their muzzel go bang without a firing pin safety, no hammer drop required.
 
BikeLock said:
It's literally three parts you dumb nigger. Plunger, plunger spring, and actuator.

Pretty much the standard FPS setup found on any proper carry gun (Which excludes every single 1911 that lacks one, lul).

The 1911 is the original "drop and pop" gun.

Edit:

Pro Tip: A stronger spring and titanium does NOT make the 1911 drop safe, it only increases the height from which you can drop it. 1911's dropped on their muzzel go bang without a firing pin safety, no hammer drop required.
Click to expand...
Look at this retard defending ruining a trigger because he's got butterfingers.

Suffer series 80 fag, suffer.
 
Going back to this ruling on machine guns: damn, if we could at least get the Hughes Amendment overturned to open up the registry to new F/A, I really want an M1A1 Thompson and one of those Knights Armament AMGs, those long recoil belt-fed machine guns that have really low felt recoil. I'd probably also get my AUG A3 converted, a modern SMG of some kind, and an F/A .22lr like the American 180 or a 10/22 with a select fire trigger pack. I really do hope this leads to something good happening, but I'm not going to get my hopes up.
 
852b579defe60a40fe8c0b2be048a7f02cb04e77.jpg
Ever hear about the CIA's "Heart Attack Gun"?
In a highly publicized hearing, CIA Director William Colby himself was called to testify before the committee. He brought with him the heart attack gun itself, allowing committee members to handle the weapon as they queried him about its development, nature, and use. What became of the gun after its single public viewing is unknown.

Furthermore, whether the weapon was ever used is also unknown. The toxin may have been put to further use as a suicide pill for American operatives or as a powerful sedative and was set aside for one operation, but as Colby claimed, “we are aware that that operation was not in fact completed.”
Click to expand...
Archive
 
BikeLock said:
80 series trigger is fine.

Enjoy your ND, fag.
Click to expand...
Tell me you have low dexterity without telling me you have low dexterity. If you can't feel the difference between a series 80 trigger and a good trigger you're either stupid or lying. It's mushy and terrible, ruins the crisp break a 1911 should have.

The series 70, titanium pin, stronger spring, combo has passed drop tests in excess of 12ft. Where the fuck are you dropping your guns from that you're worried about an ND?
 
BikeLock said:
It's literally three parts you dumb nigger. Plunger, plunger spring, and actuator.

Pretty much the standard FPS setup found on any proper carry gun (Which excludes every single 1911 that lacks one, lul).

The 1911 is the original "drop and pop" gun.

Edit:

Pro Tip: A stronger spring and titanium does NOT make the 1911 drop safe, it only increases the height from which you can drop it. 1911's dropped on their muzzel go bang without a firing pin safety, no hammer drop required.
Click to expand...
It’s gonna be interesting to see how many incidents will result from all the agencys adopting Staccatos, which are not drop safe.
 
WelperHelper99 said:
What I'm getting at EggImpregnator is that it's the same way you like 9mm in your glocks. It has pros and cons. 9mm, solid round. Has less energy than 45, 40, or 10mm. At the same time less recoil, more ammo per mag, and generally more accurate and faster firing than bigger rounds.
Click to expand...
I already made a reply to this exact argument 10 posts before you wrote yours. On the same page you posted yours.

Post in thread 'Mega Rad Gun Thread' https://kiwifarms.net/threads/mega-rad-gun-thread.550/post-19159195
 
Foley said:
Because there is actually subsonic 7.62x39 ammunition, can't do that with a high velocity 5.56 or 5.45. How relevant is this? Well, basically every SOF unit in the world still prefers the smaller caliber.

.300 BLK is probably the better cartridge technically, but I was kinda looking at it from 7.62x39 vs 5.56 angle.
Click to expand...

my understanding of why 7.62 is better for suppressed guns has to do with bullet weight. going by simple kinetic energy (k= 1/2mv^2) a lightweight 5.56 bullet slowed down to subsonic speeds is going to lose most of its kinetic energy whereas a heavy 7.62 bullet going slow is still going to have a bit of a punch to it. i believe this is the reason given why the russian military, especially their special forces, kept the 47 around well after the 74 was adopted purely because the 7.62 was the better choice for suppressors. (though how the 7.62 compares to the 9x39 i dont know, but im guessing the 9x39 is superior considering that is what they moved to for all their cool suppressed guns.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom