Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I think a PCC/SMG/PDW in 7.5mm FK would be killer. Flat shooting and excellent range with much better terminal ballistics compared to other pistol calibers. I'm sure it would require either some kind of recoil dampening system, like the FK Brno pistols have, a locked breech, or both, but I think it could be viable. The big thing holding something like that back is that it's a proprietary cartridge and only two weapons chamber it: the FK Brno Field Pistol and the PSD.
 
Glocks are just so good. 9 thousand rounds through my Glock 49 as of today. Only 2 malfunctions, both not related to the firearm. One dud round, and the battery tray loosened and popped out during shooting. I got a good deal on some federal flat nose 147gr fmj. Something you would think is more prone to jamming because of the projectile shape. Shot 500 rounds of it today and no malfunctions. However it has absolute dog shit accuracy.
 
Three Russian guys (who used to work for Lobaev Arms) in Canada have been as the kids say, Cooking
They have three fascinating designs to their name

The Monoceros (originally in 12G but can also work with straightwall rifle cartridges). Designed originally to be underbarrel mounted by can be used in a standalone configuration with snazzy wood (or theoretically polymer) grips
1726327046682.png


They have a gas operated, rifle caliber handgun that they are working on under the Project name of "Wolverine"
Striker fired, Chambered in 7.62x39, 5.56x45 and derivatives (.300 Blackout, .350 Legend). To do this, unless they have access to black magic wizardry, I think they might be infringing knowingly or unknowingly on a patent held by Crye Precision regarding cramming full size rifle ammunition into small magazines
1726327320879.png

They have plans for three versions and for US Sales
1726327504489.png

The pistol can also be integrated with the above mentioned Monoceros
1726327539512.png


And lastly at 2:44 they show off a .410 Pepperbox carbine they're prototyping

Another video of the Monoceros

Enhanced 3D Printed Saiga-12 mags based off an earlier design
1726328057109.png

Bolt and Magazine for a prototype DIY 20 gauge, Short stroke piston semi auto shotgun
1726328338316.png
1726328360656.png
Bolt is made from a 1'' round bar with 3D Printed jigs, drill press, angle grinder and file. Features an extractor made from a Carabiner clip nestled inside a 3D Printed TPU Sleeve.

In August of last year, a Russian SF Guy by the name of Valery Polovinka was killed during the course of the SMO. He is pictured here with a Bullpup AK that does not resemble a Groza (though it incorporates a Groza Suppressor), Kochevnik or Ukraninan Black Storm indicating to me at least that it is a DIY or Artisanal conversion
1726328667039.png

Ranger with KAC LAMG
1726328785994.png

XM7 With XM157 FCS and AN/PAS-35. 15lb rifle go brrrrrr
1726329242984.png

FAL With PSO in use by a member of the Rapid Support Forces in Sudan
1726329694134.png

AGPinochet said:
Found a Pakistani Guy's youtube channel whose main hobby is fish and aquariums but he has uploaded a few videos on guns
Click to expand...
A pistol of similar styling but different construction
1726329946323.png

SR-2
1726330054852.png

Taliban with FAMAS
1726330225800.png

Kim Jong Un with a North Korean clone of the AK-12 family that includes a mix and match of new, old and original parts.
1726330714624.png
-Obr. 2018 muzzle brake
-Entirely new handguards
-Railed dust cover and dustcover retaining pin are different
-Safety resembles the new Obr. 2023 safety but I can't tell if it's a 1:1 clone
-Trigger guard looks to be the Pre-Obr. 2020 monolithic with the grip style and thus uses standard AK grips
-Obr. 2020 stock (it would be silly imo the get the Obr. 2020 stock and not the new monolithic grip and trigger guard assembly so I might be wrong about the trigger guard).
 
Last edited:
I get the feeling the 5th circuit really, really hates gun laws in general.

After US. v Ramhi most fifth circuit cases on the issue have been remanded (ex: US v. Daniels on striking down 922 (g) (3) )... Still, the 5th is not a fan of gun control, a new case has popped up:

US v. Connelly No. 23-50312 has ruled that 922 (g) (3) cannot apply to someone unless they are currently intoxicated and possessing a firearm.
Paola Connelly is a non-violent, marijuana smoking gunowner. El Paso police came to her house in response to a “shots fired” call. When they arrived, they saw John, Paola’s husband, standing at their neighbor’s door firing a shotgun. After arresting him, they spoke with Paola, who indicated that she would at times smoke marijuana as a sleep aid and for anxiety. A sweep revealed that the Connellys’ home contained drug paraphernalia and several firearms, including firearms owned by Paola. There was no indication that Paola was intoxicated at the time.

Paola was charged with violating: (1) 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) by possessing firearms and ammunition as an unlawful user of a controlled substance, and (2) 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(3) by providing firearms and ammunition to an unlawful user of a controlled substance. Paola argued in a motion to dismiss, and the District Court ultimately agreed, that §§ 922(g)(3) and 922(d)(3) were facially unconstitutional and that § 922(g)(3) was unconstitutional as applied to her under the Second Amendment.

This appeal asks us to consider whether Paola’s Second Amendment rights were infringed, and the answer depends on whether § 922(g)(3) is consistent with our history and tradition of firearms regulation. The short of it is that our history and tradition may support some limits on a presently intoxicated person’s right to carry a weapon (and for that reason Paola’s facial challenges to §§ 922(g)(3) and 922(d)(3) fail), but they do not support disarming a sober person based solely on past substance usage. Nor, contrary to what the government contends, do restrictions on the mentally ill or more generalized traditions of disarming “dangerous” persons apply to nonviolent, occasional drug users when of sound mind. We AFFIRM as to Paola’s as-applied challenge and REVERSE as to her facial challenges.
Click to expand...
Not only is this a circuit split this decision is split inside the 5th circuit COA with US. v Daniels 23-376
 

Attachments

My fellow gun niggers what's even the point of the SIG spear? I see no advantage to it unless you are fighting a large population heavily armed with M4-compatible weapons in a geologically diverse area and you don't want the "enemy" to resupply. I can only think of one country where that's the case.
c091a0c3e63d4c5e9c7f0e145bef4da9.jpg
MAGA country in case you are retarded.
 
Lion Kang said:
My fellow gun niggers what's even the point of the SIG spear? I see no advantage to it unless you are fighting a large population heavily armed with M4-compatible weapons in a geologically diverse area and you don't want the "enemy" to resupply. I can only think of one country where that's the case.
View attachment 6415055
MAGA country in case you are retarded.
Click to expand...
The point is you want to join in slap fights with FAL/G3/M14 guys.
That or you want to hunt with an AR, but the game in your area is to big for 5.56.
 
♂CANAM productions♂ said:
Not only is this a circuit split this decision is split inside the 5th circuit COA with US. v Daniels 23-376
Click to expand...
That just means something will have to go up en banc so the 5th Circuit can settle what the law is. Ignoring prior panel precedent outside an en banc setting is pretty fucked, though. This is something particular to the 5th Circuit it seems. When a panel makes a decision in the 9th Circuit that the other judges dislike, they always just send it en banc.

And even though the usual suspects hate on the 11th Circuit as much as the 5th, 11th Circuit panels don't do this type of bullshit—they explain why they would change the precedent en banc in the majority opinion or in a concurrence/dissent, but almost always rule according to prior panel precedent. Since Trump started appointing judges, it's always 5th Circuit panels doing this type of sperging (even though I agree with the judgment a lot of the time).
 
Lion Kang said:
My fellow gun niggers what's even the point of the SIG spear? I see no advantage to it unless you are fighting a large population heavily armed with M4-compatible weapons in a geologically diverse area and you don't want the "enemy" to resupply. I can only think of one country where that's the case.
View attachment 6415055
MAGA country in case you are retarded.
Click to expand...
The point is some theoretical future war where people with super advance body armor are shooting at each other from extended distances.
 
he who has thus come/gone said:
That just means something will have to go up en banc so the 5th Circuit can settle what the law is. Ignoring prior panel precedent outside an en banc setting is pretty fucked, though. This is something particular to the 5th Circuit it seems. When a panel makes a decision in the 9th Circuit that the other judges dislike, they always just send it en banc.

And even though the usual suspects hate on the 11th Circuit as much as the 5th, 11th Circuit panels don't do this type of bullshit—they explain why they would change the precedent en banc in the majority opinion or in a concurrence/dissent, but almost always rule according to prior panel precedent. Since Trump started appointing judges, it's always 5th Circuit panels doing this type of sperging (even though I agree with the judgment a lot of the time).
Click to expand...
Daniel's is technically on remand via Rahimi (however that's spelt) is the sole saving grace of this procedural argument, but I'm not surprised since the 5th (Especially the N. District of Texas) has been historically hostile to gun control. SCOTUS already accepted certiorari on that case so it'll probably go back up to SCOTUS sooner or later.

What does surprise me is the fact they are so eager to publish this case in the context of Ramihi being reversed (and out of the W. District of TX). I think this is taking a page from the 9th circuit having a backlog of cases that any "win" in the case is useless due to some new law/ruling.

The geofence warrant did come out of left field (the 5th was extremely hostile to electronic privacy arguments in the 4th/5th amendment vein as well). I wonder if those judges were a concession to the Tea party/Freedom caucus faction of the party, certainly seems that way since I can't locate a l conservative being receptive to both gun rights, electronic privacy, and drug decriminalization, neverless a judge.
 
Lion Kang said:
My fellow gun niggers what's even the point of the SIG spear?
Click to expand...
It's a gun made for a future war that doesn't exist yet (a conflict where body exoskeletons exist), it also works for a war of yesterday (long ranges of Afganistan). In a present day conflict of Ukraine, it is a worse firearm than a 70 year old AKM with any optical sight.
 
1000040107.jpg

Today was spent at the range checking POI shift with/without a suppressor at 300 and 600yds. Got me to wondering what sort of distances would a typical hobbyist shooter be looking at in the US?
 
Geoff Capes Vapes Apes said:
View attachment 6415324

Today was spent at the range checking POI shift with/without a suppressor at 300 and 600yds. Got me to wondering what sort of distances would a typical hobbyist shooter be looking at in the US?
Click to expand...
I’ve been to a range that had 2,000 yards, although it’s not the norm. A lot of outdoor ranges have 100 yards. I have one range near me that goes to 860 yards and another that goes to 300m. I have only shot to about 900 yards. I typically enjoy shooting 300m and closer.

IMG_4132.jpeg
I was doing some shooting earlier today at 75 yards off a log.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom