- Joined
- Jun 5, 2020
You also need dedicated dual-zero optics that don't exist, or to shoot at such close ranges that it doesn't matter.I mean the range is the same as any PCC. As for cost, I could see it being 600 bucks if you went all in on polymer. The no glock mags thought WOULD be a hard sell. The mags would have to be proprietary.
People under 65 don't have hordes of .38 special, so there is no market. You would almost be better off selling a 9mm/5.56 combo gun.The advantage is you can use your horde of 38 special or whatever revolver round you have in a semi auto rifle. The options for using 38 special or 357 magnum are basically either wheelguns or lever actions. A semi auto option would be nice.
It's not an investment if it doesn't have any chance to appreciate, so by shooting it at all you are cutting into your margins. And in any case, everybody old enough to own 1,000 rounds of .38 special has enough free time to reload.It would be targeting a niche, but I think it could be profitable. It would make a person's 1000+ round horde of wheelgun ammo a bit more of a useful investment.
You'd need an adjustable gas system or some kind of extremely fine-tuned roller delay to actually cycle .38SPL and .357mag out of the same semi-auto, so for reasons of "having to pay your engineers" it would certainly cost a lot more than a single-caliber weapon.They could plink with 38 special, then hunt with 357 in the same gun. Unlike 300 blk or 7.62x39mm, the cost is variable between those rounds. Buy the cheap 38 special to plink with, and a small amount of 357 to hunt with/ home defense. I think it's economical in that sense.