Mega Rad Gun Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
What's most important is it needs to be easy for her to use. Where is she defending herself? Is this for the home? Concealed carry? If it's just for home get her an S&W M&P EZ in 9mm, that's the quintessential wife/gf/mother gun and it has that title for a very good reason.
View attachment 6635958
Don't fall for the "we took this gun and made it pink" marketing. Those guns aren't for women, they're for men buying guns for women. What matters most for your fiance is a gun that works for her in the role she wants, and that it's easy to use, especially if she is a firearm novice which is the impression I get. Unless you're trying to surprise her, take her to a good-sized gun store with a wide selection (or a gun show) and let her get her hands on a number of different guns.
I understand it's part of the design they copied, but I wish these things didn't have the grip safety. Not a big issue if you actually shoot, but I've seen a few new shooters fail to depress it, enough to avoid recommending it to family/friends I know won't shoot more than a few times a year.
 
I understand it's part of the design they copied, but I wish these things didn't have the grip safety. Not a big issue if you actually shoot, but I've seen a few new shooters fail to depress it, enough to avoid recommending it to family/friends I know won't shoot more than a few times a year.
Does the grip safety on that have a particularly strong spring? I just don't see how you could have a reasonable grip on a firearm and not depress it.
 
Does the grip safety on that have a particularly strong spring? I just don't see how you could have a reasonable grip on a firearm and not depress it.
Not a strong spring problem. Some people struggle to put their hand in the right place and it doesn't have a very tactile on/off feel imo. Overall not a problem for people who practice. I just see them get pushed on new shooters as the default 'poor hand strength' option when there's some drawbacks to the design. And those are the people who have problems consistently depressing it.

I'm picking up a pdp f series for myself. Might recommend one of those if it performs well.
 
Has there been any new guns in .30 super carry
As far as I know Hi-point was the most recent manufacturer to release a gun in .30SC and it was one of their carbines (which I believe makes them the only manufacturer and probably the only people on earth to have ever made a .30SC Carbine besides maybe Federal themselves or some whacko bubba gunsmif)

There's this guy in Wyoming, His name is Gary Hughes and he's a Rancher and SOT/FFL. He uses a Stg-44 as one of his ranch rifles
1731425066976.png

There is like $50k in Equipment in this photo
1731425249453.png
But uh, what's that, what's goin' on there buddy?
1731425314283.png

Another photo of that custom MAS-36 owned by a foreign fighter Jihadi in Idlib, Syria
1731425361900.png

SR-2 with a kind of stock I've never seen before
1731425412878.png
1731425446847.png

Two Leader Kits and something you don't see all that often on either side of the current hostilities. A clip on (or rather clamp on) thermal. Usually it's either a dedicated unit or nothing with the exception of Ukr. SF who I would assume have SkeetIR's and VooDoo-S's.
1731425600718.png

APS Underwater assault rifle
1731425641882.png

1731425670913.png

M-60D In Ukraine. Could the DOD not have hit up US Ordnance for a trigger pack or something.
1731425740464.png

What looks to be an experimental model of the PP-90M1 that uses a PP-2000 style charging handle
1731425938933.png

Ranger LAMG.
1731426249208.png
A few notes
1. This is a Post 2021 model meaning the feed tray that flips to the 3 o' clock instead of the 12
2. First time I've seen one without a buffer tube much less an MCX Stock

"Stingray" FGC-9 in Myanmar. Simply a more bigger FGC-9, much rarer than it's smaller progenitor
1731428259976.png

Chinese .338 (Norma? Lapua? New Indigenous chinese thing?) MG
1731429652271.png

Faxon has a new, to say the least, interesting gas block design
I don't know how well moving the gas tube forward and back is going to play

Val with AR stock

PKM Pack

Actual Stich Profi prouct video for their Polymer PKM Belts
 
I would like to get a slimmer gun that I can mount a Trijicon red dot to. I'm currently leaning towards an M&P Shield Plus OR, but it doesn't seem to support Trijicon optics.

I have a gen 3 Glock 26 that I pocket carry. I don't mind the Glock but I prefer the looks of the M&P series and I'm curious about switching platforms. I'm thinking Trijicon because of their reliability compared to Holosun, but maybe I'm missing another option.

What are your thoughts? Am I being retarded and should just get a Glock 43x MOS? Is pocket carry with a red dot a mistaken idea? Should I just buy more ammo instead?
 
I'm currently leaning towards an M&P Shield Plus OR, but it doesn't seem to support Trijicon optics.
it'll support whatever optic you're willing to pay to mount to it. out of the box the only Trijicon it can use is the RMR shield adapter plate for the rear sight dovetail and not the optics ready cut which is intended for crimson trace, holosun, et c type optics. leupold delta point also fits.
 
Well, gas port on the 16in BA barrel I got for the Cobb wasn't drilled properly. Gunsmith is opening it up now. Also found a guy who is in the process of machining a long action mag well that feeds from noreen mags for it. Next goal is to find someone to make me either a 6.5x55 swede or 7.5 swiss barrel for it.
 
I would like to get a slimmer gun that I can mount a Trijicon red dot to. I'm currently leaning towards an M&P Shield Plus OR, but it doesn't seem to support Trijicon optics.

I have a gen 3 Glock 26 that I pocket carry. I don't mind the Glock but I prefer the looks of the M&P series and I'm curious about switching platforms. I'm thinking Trijicon because of their reliability compared to Holosun, but maybe I'm missing another option.

What are your thoughts? Am I being retarded and should just get a Glock 43x MOS? Is pocket carry with a red dot a mistaken idea? Should I just buy more ammo instead?
Trijicon is fine, but they're really not that great a choice anymore. Holosun and SIG seem to be where it's at as they're actually making new products, and trijicon is just resting on their laurels.

On a podcast Hop and Brass Facts were on I heard mention of people having to check some sort of contacts under the dot every battery change as apparently they wore out somewhat fast. Idk if that's still a thing, but goes to show that nobody is perfect. Their tint also sucks and of course the price sucks too.

What's wrong with just sending out your slide and having it milled? 43X or 48 is solid too, but I'd also consider having one milled instead of running the MOS model.
 
What's wrong with just sending out your slide and having it milled?
Means I'll be without a conceal carry firearm for the 2-8 weeks the 26's slide is out for milling. Also seems like it'd be nicer to carry a lighter gun for a bit. I agree that milling seems a lot nicer than using an MOS adapter plate. I could always buy a used 43x/48 and immediately send it out for milling, thanks for the idea!

43X or 48
Anything against the Shield Plus instead? I know I can get one of those milled too, but finding one used might be more difficult.
 
Last edited:
Means I'll be without a conceal carry firearm for the 2-8 weeks the 26's slide is out for milling. Also seems like it'd be nicer to carry a lighter gun for a bit. I agree that milling seems a lot nicer than using an MOS adapter plate. I could always buy a used 43x/48 and immediately send it out for milling, thanks for the idea!


Anything against the Shield Plus instead? I know I can get one of those milled too, but finding one used might be more difficult.
They're supposed to be good too, and a used gun + milling fees would be solid as not everybody offers a good footprint, or a footprint at all. Friend of mine got a used G48 for like 300 with a couple mags, so there's def some savings there. The gun had zero wear on the barrel when he got it, so it was basically brand new.
When it comes to handguns, really most of them are good and its easy to overthink shit
 
Saving to finally get my PAL (leaf gun license) not going for restricted yet because I haven't had much experience with semi-autos quite just yet to really know what I want, but currently want a repeating rifle, just curious to see what your opinions are on them, I have always thought they were cool regardless of cowboy material.
 
I understand it's part of the design they copied, but I wish these things didn't have the grip safety. Not a big issue if you actually shoot, but I've seen a few new shooters fail to depress it, enough to avoid recommending it to family/friends I know won't shoot more than a few times a year.
The grip safety is there for a very good reason. The target market of the M&P EZ is firearm novices, one of the biggest issues they have is not holding the gun correctly. The grip safety (which is easy to depress) forces them to hold it properly and learn proper firearm handling technique even in the absence of a training environment. I didn't "get" it until I was at the range with a novice who had an EZ, and I witnessed them holding the gun wrong and it not firing because the grip safety wasn't depressed, then they corrected their grip, fired the gun, and that's when it clicked for me why they did that. They didn't do it because people wanted it, they did it because people needed it. You have to keep in mind the EZ is intended for normies and novices, and every design element is in service of that.
 
Not that I'm aware of, I'm not really sure it'll be going anywhere either......

In my situation it wouldn't be that practical because of mag restrictions as a shield mag in a G43X meets that, and companies only seem to be rechambering older guns. A single or 1.5 stack in 30 super with steel mags would be awesome, but I just don't see that happening in the American market.
People will say stuff like "size of .380 performance of 9", or "11.5 is basically 13.7" but in reality it's not and that's a fake and gay thing to say.
The idea is good but I see no reason to switch over for what it has to offer even in a situation with larger magazines.
I agree. I think it'd be cool if there was a 40 round mag in 30 super carry the size of a 30 round 9mm, but people already have 9mm. Which kinda stinks, but it is what it is.
The grip safety is there for a very good reason. The target market of the M&P EZ is firearm novices, one of the biggest issues they have is not holding the gun correctly. The grip safety (which is easy to depress) forces them to hold it properly and learn proper firearm handling technique even in the absence of a training environment. I didn't "get" it until I was at the range with a novice who had an EZ, and I witnessed them holding the gun wrong and it not firing because the grip safety wasn't depressed, then they corrected their grip, fired the gun, and that's when it clicked for me why they did that. They didn't do it because people wanted it, they did it because people needed it. You have to keep in mind the EZ is intended for normies and novices, and every design element is in service of that.
Held a EZ once. Extremely comfortable gun. I found the grip safety easy to depress too. Like you said it's a good starter gun.

Edit: why aren't there side or top mag feed sub guns/PCCs anymore? They let you get real low to the ground without having your 30 round mag dig into the dirt. The Owen gun comes to mind when thinking of a good design in this category.
CompletedOwenGun1942 (1).png
 
Last edited:
The grip safety is there for a very good reason. The target market of the M&P EZ is firearm novices, one of the biggest issues they have is not holding the gun correctly. The grip safety (which is easy to depress) forces them to hold it properly and learn proper firearm handling technique even in the absence of a training environment. I didn't "get" it until I was at the range with a novice who had an EZ, and I witnessed them holding the gun wrong and it not firing because the grip safety wasn't depressed, then they corrected their grip, fired the gun, and that's when it clicked for me why they did that. They didn't do it because people wanted it, they did it because people needed it. You have to keep in mind the EZ is intended for normies and novices, and every design element is in service of that.
Yes that was the entire point of my posts. It's designed for new shooters or people who hardly shoot and it cannot fire without a good grip, something new shooters often lack especially under stress. As a range rental training aid it's fine, but not the ideal 'old woman' gun people say it is.
 
why aren't there side or top mag feed sub guns/PCCs anymore? They let you get real low to the ground without having your 30 round mag dig into the dirt. The Owen gun comes to mind when thinking of a good design in this category.
I guess SMGs were never thought to be used from a prone position that much, and bringing the magazine on top of the gun makes for funky sight arrangements. Especially nowadays, when optics are the default instead of iron sights.
 
Edit: why aren't there side or top mag feed sub guns/PCCs anymore? They let you get real low to the ground without having your 30 round mag dig into the dirt. The Owen gun comes to mind when thinking of a good design in this category.
The Owen was made by an Aussie. It's upside-down by default.
 
I guess SMGs were never thought to be used from a prone position that much, and bringing the magazine on top of the gun makes for funky sight arrangements. Especially nowadays, when optics are the default instead of iron sights.
The sensible argument
The Owen was made by an Aussie. It's upside-down by default.
The true and honest answer lol
 
Back
Top Bottom