Boney
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2024
Didn't know that. Also, kinda shocked the CETME wasn't just an attempt at a G3 clone.Innovatively german? Sure
Innovatively HK? Not by a long shot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn't know that. Also, kinda shocked the CETME wasn't just an attempt at a G3 clone.Innovatively german? Sure
Innovatively HK? Not by a long shot.
Yeah, it was the other way around. G3 is a "clone" of the CETME.Didn't know that. Also, kinda shocked the CETME wasn't just an attempt at a G3 clone.
k98k rifles
I call my FNX 45 the "USP 45 Tactical at home" for a reason. Lul.I don't know about that. I mean, FN makes plenty of stuff that goes toe to toe with H&K, but as far as having a consistent history of excellent QC and producta that are both innovative and actually turn out to be good/relevent 15years later? H&K has them beat.
Just look at the history of FN pistols vs H&K pistols.
My FNX is black. I actually wanted the baby poop tan one, but the price was right for mine, as it came with a Vortex on top, too.I was with a friend and we rented that fnx pre pimp. I thought it would be a nice enough gun made to over sell to Leo/mil and cawadooty kids.
But man it was a VERY well laid out weapon. Legitimately impressed and liked it. Not in marketplace for something like it and when they came out only in fde (can that trend stop) but damn FN hit a home run with it.
Saw a YouTuber shoot one of those rti carcano converted guns. He down loaded it a bunch.
If you don't hear from me after Saturday, my luck wasn't as good.
FN definitely has H&K beat when it comes to pistols purely by the virtue of the High Power, It came out in 1935 and they still make it and it’s still used by a significant amount of countries. 90 years and still relevant!Just look at the history of FN pistols vs H&K pistols.
you can get factory Mauser hunting M98s that are very very high quality for the same or less as a worn out K98, its crazy.I tend to enjoy the older military surplus guns. Muh woodnsteel and all.
That said, what never ceases to amaze me is the price people are willing to pay for k98k rifles.
This is a basic, bolt action rifle, which had around 14 million made. The only markings found on these rifles are essentially a serial number, manufacturers code, and very small proof marks. Yet, for some reason, people will pay well into the 1000-1200 figures for one of these rifles.
To put it into perspective, the FN manufactured Ethiopian mausers, only had about 25 thousand rifles total. They each have a large lion of judah proofmark, a large Ethiopian national crest across the receiver, and are in an interwar pattern.
Yet, even very nice condition examples, when they do come up for sale, only reach around $800.
There are many other examples of much rarer and (imo) more interesting mausers that dont even touch k98k prices, and the whole affair baffles me.
HiPower is my favorite 9mm. But there is a reason my EDC and my battle belt have glocks in the holster.FN definitely has H&K beat when it comes to pistols purely by the virtue of the High Power, It came out in 1935 and they still make it and it’s still used by a significant amount of countries. 90 years and still relevant!
I will personally beat Elon to Mars to make sure the first gun on Mars is a Mosin Nagant.Glonks on Mars.
Just load it up a with bubba's reloads, gingerly hold it in the right direction, and pull the trigger. It might get there.I will personally beat Elon to Mars to make sure the first gun on Mars is a Mosin Nagant.
Practically every pistol on the planet uses the lock up method of the Hi-Power save for like four or five pistols from Beretta that are loosely based on the P38, or have a rotating barrel action.FN definitely has H&K beat when it comes to pistols purely by the virtue of the High Power, It came out in 1935 and they still make it and it’s still used by a significant amount of countries. 90 years and still relevant!
The Hi-Power and the 1911 always make me wonder what they would have become if they'd never been retired as main sidearms. Like, if no one ever bothered to design another handgun ever again, what would they look like after almost a century of basically every arms manufacturer in the world having an incentive to improve it? I know someone, somewhere has been fucking around with them since their release, but what might they have become if they'd had as much focused development as the AR-15 or AR-18 has had? The logical answer is that they'd end up looking a lot like 2011s, but there's always that chance that some weirdo working at Colt would do a few too many lines and make some breakthrough.The Hi-Power is like the 1911, they're not really used in anything anymore and the ones left in service are clapped the fuck out, barring the handful of folks who use a gucci build from Novaks or something for duty use.
You’d probably end up with something like the CZ-75 and it’s descendants. To my understanding it’s basically the final evolution of the high-power, and it’s my second favourite gun ever.The Hi-Power and the 1911 always make me wonder what they would have become if they'd never been retired as main sidearms. Like, if no one ever bothered to design another handgun ever again, what would they look like after almost a century of basically every arms manufacturer in the world having an incentive to improve it? I know someone, somewhere has been fucking around with them since their release, but what might they have become if they'd had as much focused development as the AR-15 or AR-18 has had? The logical answer is that they'd end up looking a lot like 2011s, but there's always that chance that some weirdo working at Colt would do a few too many lines and make some breakthrough.
That's how it was in the States before the Staccato came in, everything else was seen as trash or a gimmick.but here it’s basically team glock and team CZ with both sides constantly arguing over which one is better.
I call my FNX 45 the "USP 45 Tactical at home" for a reason. Lul.
I mean, yeah its a good gun and all, and it has more features than the USP (larger mags, Pic rail, an optics cut), but the USP still has a better trigger (well my HK45 does) and the HK45 shoots a bit softer, but I can only really tell when I shoot them back to back. Accuracy is a wash, and longevity is TBD, but I picked up my FNX used, and my first experience with it was as a jamm-o-matic, as I had neglected to really clean and lube the gun before I took it out for its first spin. Seems like the guy who traded it in ran a can on it until it got so dirty that it began to malfunction and just dumped it. It's fine now, of course.
The "squishy" magwell of the FN is overblown, imho, and mostly due to cramming 15 rounds of 45 into such a limited space. You're not really going to be collapsing the sides of the grip in with a proper grip, with a magazine in the gun, you can only really pinch it together a bit at the bottom.
I like my VP's too much to even give the FN striker pistols a fair shot, which is too bad, as they seem to be fairly good pistols, just in a saturated market full of good options.
I would like FN to drop an FNX in 10mm, the amount of good 10mm DA/SA options is pretty much limited to the EAA Witness pistols.