- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
He seems to have adopted the traditional Sigger defense in that it's an assumption that the argument has to do with the trigger itself whereas nobody criticizing the design has brought it up beyond the occasional "They removed the trigger dingus from the production design how curious".I am really interested in hearing him justify/expand on this position because its quite open ended. Is he implying that a trigger dingus (only just learned today what the technical term for it is) safety would have prevented these guns going off? Is he implying that because there was no trigger safety/external safety that the design of the gun lead it down the path to an eventual critical design failure?
Considering the FBI is the only institution of note to have investigated this and have disclosed findings similar to the internet gun community in that a trigger dingus would not have solved it(evidenced by M17/M18s with manual safeties going off) he is aggressively missing the point and will not make friends with this in order to remain on good terms with the industry.































