Mega Rad Gun Thread

[BikeLock]

If one wants to build an acurate clone of the AR from the alpha version of Rust, CDNN currently has the sights in stock for less than $20. I don't know how "good" they may be, but I've spent more on worse things.

https://www.cdnnsports.com/ar15-sight-set-pull-up-alum-picatinny-mount.html

 

[Bogliacci]

If one wants to build an acurate clone of the AR from the alpha version of Rust, CDNN currently has the sights in stock for less than $20. I don't know how "good" they may be, but I've spent more on worse things.

https://www.cdnnsports.com/ar15-sight-set-pull-up-alum-picatinny-mount.html

View attachment 7870954



View attachment 7870927

This is goofy as hell and I kinda like it

 

[Polock]

My first carry gun was a cz-75 compact

My nigga. 75C75B

 

[Belgians in the Congo]

I israeli carry and people chew me out on it but I was wondering if maybe carrying with a blank in the chamber is a fair compromise? that way you don't have to rack it but if it misfires it poses no threat

This is common in new shooters, a thing that fixed it on a friend of mine was that I 3D printed a dummy round out of basic PLA and had him carry it on his gun and had him run around on drills and using it daily.
After a while he realized not once did his gun ever go off regardless of whatever use he put it under both from doing dumb drills in the range and also just on his normal day to day use, so he swapped the fake boolit for a real one.

Provided you got a decent gun (lol SIG) you'll be fine, personally I enjoy DA/SA the most so I'm decocker pilled.

 

[Pretend To Imagine]

I stand corrected. Well once the FRT for these things comes on the market, those HK 21 kits will be  VERY tempting.

IMO AR 9s are mediocre at best PCCs. You're still restricted to the form factor of an AR15, at which point, why not just have it in 5.56? One of the requirements IMO of a good PCC, is that it is substantially smaller than a rifle in form (if not its entire size because of the gAyTF and the NFA), especially with magazines in the grip like the Ruger PCC or Keltec sub 2000

The biggest issue I have with AR9's is that absolutely NO effort has been spent to delete the completely unnecessary buffer tube from the AR9 design. Someone needs to "bite the bullet" and come up with a buffertubeless upper that still works with an AR lower, sort of what Brownell's did for the BR-180.

I want an 8 in AR-9 that can fold or collapse into a package that is the same size or smaller than an MP5 with an equivalent length barrel, and have the ability to function while folded, and no, that goofy folding buffer tube adaptor does not count, as the firearm will not function more than once while folded (for obvious reasons).

Unless your AR9 behaves as I described, any price over $900 is too much, I don't care who made it, I don't care if its got some sort of goofy radial delay system. If it can't fold into a package the same size as an MP5, there is no reason to chose one over an MP5 other than cost.

It would be nice if someone made a gun that took a magazine through the pistol grip that wasn’t garbage.

For me the size of the AR 9 isn’t an issue. I use mine for training and shooting competitions as a substitute for a 5.56 AR15.

 

[Boney]

I israeli carry and people chew me out on it but I was wondering if maybe carrying with a blank in the chamber is a fair compromise? that way you don't have to rack it but if it misfires it poses no threat

No. Terrible idea. Also, don't Isreali carry.

 

[Baked Al-Aqsa]

I israeli carry and people chew me out on it but I was wondering if maybe carrying with a blank in the chamber is a fair compromise? that way you don't have to rack it but if it misfires it poses no threat

I really regret not getting a gun that had a button press safety because I do not like that it can be fired with just the trigger without any confirmation when starting to shoot. I don't understand why this is unacceptable. I didn't know guns were made without button safeties.

The only reason Israeli carry exists is because until the 90s, Israel had to rely on dozens of different guns made by dozens of different manufacturers with different manuals of arms for military and police. Making an idiot proof method of pistol carry that has the bonus of preventing NDs among the lowest common denominator thrives in such a situation. For literally anybody else who doesn't have this issue, it makes no sense.

If you ever have to draw a gun on someone, you better damn well sure be shooting. Anything less is considered brandishing and is a felony in most states which means you lose your guns. Hell, in most states you will be in much less trouble if you outright shoot someone who is unarmed (and obviously being a threat to you) than if you pull out a gun on them without firing.

You carry a Glock, right? In that case, it cannot and will not fire as long as the trigger isn't pulled. The striker spring is not compressed until the trigger is pulled and the trigger cannot pivot from mere momentum from even a drop alone. You can bounce a Glock off the wall as much as you want and it won't fire. They truly are the safest guns on the market.

 

[The Dude]

GLOCK is literally the most common law enforcement pistol around and has been for nearly 30 years. Its a proven safe design. Its not going to "just go off" if you're doing your part.

 

[Boney]

I really regret not getting a gun that had a button press safety because I do not like that it can be fired with just the trigger without any confirmation when starting to shoot. I don't understand why this is unacceptable. I didn't know guns were made without button safeties.

Don't sweat it. Your Glock is drop proof and extremely safe. Follow weapon safety rules when handeling and nothing can go wrong. I have a guide that includes basic knowledge of what you need to look up or familerize yourself with for safe carry.

I'll even do a write up on some conceal carry basics ASAP.

 

[S.C.U.D.]

I israeli carry and people chew me out on it but I was wondering if maybe carrying with a blank in the chamber is a fair compromise? that way you don't have to rack it but if it misfires it poses no threat

It bears mentioning that if the blank goes off say, while you're carrying it, in your pocket, etc. where it's in close contact with your body it will pose quite the threat. It's not as bad as a bullet but it's messy.

They do make conceal carry guns with safeties, but it's more common for them not to as that makes firing faster. Technically speaking, your Glock does have a safety, the trigger dingus. It won't just go off if your finger isn't on the trigger. I carry a Ruger LCP which doesn't even have one of those and I haven't shot myself yet.

 

[Silver Coin Anon]

I israeli carry and people chew me out on it but I was wondering if maybe carrying with a blank in the chamber is a fair compromise? that way you don't have to rack it but if it misfires it poses no threat

I personally use the rubber bumper thing when I have one loaded (black cities or gas stations) because I am also pretty sure I am going to shoot my dick off if I don't. Unless you own that Jeet pistol that fires itself, I found these to be suitable for pocket carry with one in the chamber even if you have keys and tools and shit in your pocket. They are very easy to pop out with intent but hard to remove without intention. EDIT: I have no idea if these images uploaded they are just color blocks to me

 

[BallsMcLongDong]

My nigga. 75C75B

My fellow niggas, was the Jericho. Less pedestrian, but I guess you guys can hang out with me.

 

[T-800]

My first carry gun was a kimber 45 ultra carry. At first I would carry without a round in the chamber. Eventually I would carry it locked and loaded and more than a few times the safety would get flipped to the off position while in the holster. It still never went off in the holster. If you ever need to draw your gun youre gonna be happy theres a round in the chamber.

 

[BallsMcLongDong]

I really regret not getting a gun that had a button press safety because I do not like that it can be fired with just the trigger without any confirmation when starting to shoot. I don't understand why this is unacceptable. I didn't know guns were made without button safeties.

The fear goes away the more confident you get. I used to not allow guns in the house that had one in the chamber at all, and I grew up shooting and hunting. It's different when it's on you.
But eventually you get comfy, and you feel like a retard every single time you realize you've been out and about while not having one racked.

I made the compromise of Israeli carrying. But I realize now that's foolish.
Odds of something happening to you while you are carrying is not stopping an active shooter, it's going to be quick shotting the nigger walking up on you and grabbing in his waistband.

If that's the case, you don't have prep time. Not only are you going to need to have that gun hot within a couple seconds, but you're gonna be adrenaline dumping the whole time.

Carry on empty for now. Till you get comfortable and realize that your gun is not suddenly going to go off. Or you could be a CZ chad like the rest of us and get a SA/DA Hammer fired gun.
I can let the hammer down on a live round, pop the safety on, and throw it against the concrete and it won't go off. But within those few seconds, I can drop the safety and go BOOM.

 

[HelpingNoone]

I really regret not getting a gun that had a button press safety because I do not like that it can be fired with just the trigger without any confirmation when starting to shoot. I don't understand why this is unacceptable. I didn't know guns were made without button safeties.

Get a snap cap for the chamber and carry it for a few weeks in a proper holster (basically Israeli carry with a snap cap in the chamber). If you don't see a firing pin mark on the cartridge, then your setup is safe.

Thats what got me to change my mindset when switching from hammer to striker fired guns.

 

[AGPinochet]

Behold: Another G3 FRT project. I really think FRTs have some potential here. Their proliferation has really begun to spread. There's variants for SCARs and AKs too. If someone can make a good (AKA not AR9) PCC frt setup..........

Guy's a little late to the G3 game, S3igu2 (and by extension, AS Designs) and some rando (assuming said rando isn't that guy) already have their own designs out, wonder if he'll be able to compete via pricing.
Link to Rando's X

https://x.com/Ella_Mella_Pee

The biggest issue I have with AR9's is that absolutely NO effort has been spent to delete the completely unnecessary buffer tube from the AR9 design. Someone needs to "bite the bullet" and come up with a buffertubeless upper that still works with an AR lower, sort of what Brownell's did for the BR-180.

Matador Arms (they at least used to be the OEM for at least parts of the BRN-180)

I israeli carry and people chew me out on it but I was wondering if maybe carrying with a blank in the chamber is a fair compromise? that way you don't have to rack it but if it misfires it poses no threat

As Long as you carry your gun in a solid Kydex holster, and as long as your gun isn't a Sig P320, you'll be fine. Police Officers, some of the fattest, dumbest, incompetent and ill tempered people in the nation manage to not shoot themselves. Ghetto Niggers in the hood while unable to hit dey opps manage to not shoot themselves. You, being a White Man, and demonstrating yourself capable enough to withstand the full might of the Tranny Hivemind , can carry with a round in the chamber and not kill yourself.
Also in 99.99% of instances you'll need to rack the spent blank round out of the chamber because of a lack of a blank firing device generating sufficient pressure to cycle the action.
AND having your first round fired in a defensive shooting be a blank could theoretically open you up to legal liability because a Soros prosecutor could say that you weren't truly afraid of Daquandanarious because your first round wasn't intended to incapacitate him.
If you're scared of accidentally pulling the trigger while drawing Langdon Tactical makes a product called the Striker Control Device that allows you to purposefully and forcefully keep the striker forward with your thumb

https://langdontactical.com/striker-control-device-scd/

The downside to this device is that in a theoretical scenario where you're forced to jam your muzzle into a crackhead's abdomen in order to shoot him you better hope you do it just right because you can't do the "thumb over the backplate to force the gun back into battery" trick any more.

The DOJ is considering TTD

View attachment 7870499

TRUMP!

SEND ALPHABET AGENCY SWAT TEAMS AGAINST EVERY GROSS AGP WITH A HI-POINT AND MY LIFE IS YOURS!


TURNER DIARIES FIREARM CONFISCATION AND INTERNMENT CAMPS, BUT FOR TRANNIES!

High Quality photos of the DD Project Hunter Rifle submission and it's strange suppressor



Suppressor is designated EL-QDR556 and is made by Huxwrx



Notes/Observation
-Rail seems to be a modified RIS-III
-They are possibly using the same style of barrel as they do on their DD-5, marking the first instance of them doing so in a small frame format.
-The Suppressor as I already stated is strange. It looks to be some kind of Reflex/Integral unit hybrid and I'm wondering if the barrel is ported. The Flash hider is very obviously a different color and looks to be a separate piece from the suppressor body. The mounting system might consist of threads on the barrel at the rear of the suppressor and companion threads on the flash hider.
-One potential wrench in this theory is that The Glock GR-115 based submission looks to have used the same suppressor. Is it possible that Huxwrx worked with two different manufacturers providing suppressors (and maybe even barrels?) For bids on the same rifle contract?

Reminds me a little of this weird integrally suppressed barrel NSW was working on years ago

You have an integrally suppressed barrel, but you also have exhaust ports and the capability for either a thread on reflex module OR a muzzle device mounted suppressor?

Something off about this M16A4


Stoner 63A1 modified with unique folding stock for Dutch military trials




Very advanced MADE IN INDIA anti drone system using byootiful Ijraeli (almost as byootiful as ijraeli woman saar) weapons and the finest cow poop as lubricant


Filipino modified Enfield M1917 to feed from M-14 mags


Ported VZ61 barrel made as a collaborative effort between Novox Research and Titus Arms for use with a Novox integral suppressor adapter



Speaking of Novox Research, they've modified a B&T SPC-9 to be able to feed from Suomi drums, but they seem to have neglected to take a half decent photo of it.
Video of it being Shot

Promotional images from an Arfcom review video


The Gun is featured here from 0:20 to 0:31 and intermittently throughout the rest of the video

Here's an example of the lower they had SLS Printed. Lower is AR trigger/FRT Compatible


Da funny Le ebin boomer wojak maymay suppressor

Absolute Legend GunCAD Dev S3 is teasing his FRT Compatible M249S FCG


I personally would use the money that an M249S costs to buy and modify several Lima Six uppers (leave one standard, add spade grips and water cooling to another, turn one into s 7" integrally suppressed Subsonic Assault Weapon etc) but that's cool nonetheless

Mexicans have M250's but they have what Sig Saar refers to as the "World" model with quick change barrels



Place your bets on how long it's going to take for a video of an El Goblino Latinx's family getting a belt dumped into them on the orders of another El Goblino Latinx to appear.

 

[Gurney Halleck]

You sold a USP?

Oh Bill, it's priceless.

It wasn't my finest moment. I regret it but not enough to buy another one outright and I'm not really looking for any more full size .45s.

Does the 226 not have a firing pin block or other safeties then just the sear? That is the main problem with the 320. Look at the area the hammer strikes on a 92/m9 and you can see why it won't go off even if the hammer drops or something else strikes the firing pin area with the safety engaged.

The P226 has a firing pin block, but it would naturally be disengaged by the trigger being pulled in this case. The problem is that the trigger is still somehow dropping the hammer even with the manual thumb safety on. On a 1911 this wouldn't happen without some serious internal deficiencies since the thumb safety manually blocks the sear itself, but Sig was allergic to doing this until the P365 and apparently on the P22X SAO models the thumb safety only blocks the trigger bar itself, not the sear, like on the P320. This is yet another case of Cohen value engineering and Indian manufacturing combining to cause a potential catastrophe, at least this one requires you to actually pull the trigger.

 

[Ibanez RG 350EX]

I personally use the rubber bumper thing when I have one loaded (black cities or gas stations) because I am also pretty sure I am going to shoot my dick off if I don't. Unless you own that Jeet pistol that fires itself, I found these to be suitable for pocket carry with one in the chamber even if you have keys and tools and shit in your pocket. They are very easy to pop out with intent but hard to remove without intention.

Isn't having to pull a rubber plug out from behind the trigger just as fiddly and slow as having to rack the slide? I don't see the advantage.

 

[BikeLock]

Filipino modified Enfield M1917 to feed from M-14 mags

I won't do that to mine, but that's cool as fuck, especially if it works.

 

[Among Us Gaming]

It would be nice if someone made a gun that took a magazine through the pistol grip that wasn’t garbage.

Its very strange to me that good ones don't really exist. Unlike rifles, you dont really need gas or locking systems, or really even your own magazines (just use glock, colt, or uzi mags). It seems like that lowers the cost substantially, such that you could fairly easily and cheaply make something simple and workable.

already have their own designs out

Out as in "the 3d print file is available" or out as in "metal trigger pack available for sale?" The latter is what really matters, and the winner of that race will be whomever either gets to market first, or gets the patent first.