MentisWave

He's very based. A bit too idealistic about his libertarian ideals, but based nonetheless
His background is an economist, it's in his nature to be overtly idealistic based around models and "intuition" upon how the world ought to be. Doesn't matter if it is neoclassical, commie, or Austrian school that's how they all work.

EDIT: Late and gay ik
 
I’ve watched a few of his videos and while I would disagree with a few of his economic takes (I’m in favor of having some level of a social safety net for example) but he does construct his arguments in a way that doesn’t make him look like a total loon like some Libertarians or Ancaps do, also his takedowns on Vaush are good and comprehensive
 
I’ve watched a few of his videos and while I would disagree with a few of his economic takes (I’m in favor of having some level of a social safety net for example) but he does construct his arguments in a way that doesn’t make him look like a total loon like some Libertarians or Ancaps do, also his takedowns on Vaush are good and comprehensive
> (I’m in favor of having some level of a social safety net for example)
He actually is too, and explains how they can work in a privatized system here:

I think "Cultural Appropriation" is one of those things I think even wokes realize is dumb to get upset about.

But Mentis takes a .... unique approach by talking about it more as an intellectual property issue. Which I'm not sure what he's doing with that.
> But Mentis takes a .... unique approach by talking about it more as an intellectual property issue. Which I'm not sure what he's doing with that.
It's actually a pretty good analogy for why you can't "steal" a culture, same way you can't "steal" a movie or a TV show.
 
I didn't record which video it was, but there was a time he roughly equated the culture of Islamic society and 1950's USA. I generally agree with his points, but he is far too idealistic with some things.
 
> (I’m in favor of having some level of a social safety net for example)
He actually is too, and explains how they can work in a privatized system here:

> But Mentis takes a .... unique approach by talking about it more as an intellectual property issue. Which I'm not sure what he's doing with that.
It's actually a pretty good analogy for why you can't "steal" a culture, same way you can't "steal" a movie or a TV show.
this is actually a good point for arguing for total privatization, I do think in the absence of a Federal Government you would have a sort of City-State system kind of like Singapore or like some free association of neighboring cities with a common currency, i’m unsure how that would positively impact a population in comparison to now, I think a lot of the economic damage in the United States is due to lax laws surrounding Outsourcing and a shrinking job market, of course you are going to have people with mental disabilities or elderly people who will need benefits regardless, but I think a lot of economic problems would be solved by mandating a certain amount job openings be made available in the United States exclusively if a company desires market access for large corporations, again probably not a position a lot of Libertarians would agree on, but in terms of Protectionism i think something like that is far preferable to Tariffs
 
Okay, it seems he's now covering the "Groypers".

If most imageboards are now dead, what will preserve the culture that created the catboy squad?

EDIT: Uh-oh, his first point against the "Jewish Question" necessarily ignores his previous section on per capita.

DOUBLE EDIT: He acknowledged it right after I unpaused the video. Oops.
 
Last edited:
1769878659216.png1769878693632.png
 
Those anime dolls give me a kneejerk cringe reaction. Its really distracting to whatever he's arguing about
 
Back
Top Bottom