Infected MGTOW - Men Going Their Own Way

MGTOW is a group of the manosphere which instead of engaging in political activism instead opt to simply avoid women altogether.

Their two founders were stardusk (who is still quite active and somehow wants mgtow to become an area of serious academic study) and barbarossa (who seems to have moved on moreso)
They have a website mgtow.com which is extremely autistic and has a fairly small community rather distinct from the actual youtubers but likely overlapping in the audience of sandman
They have a much larger community on youtube with the main youtubers being sandman who is known for making short rage inducing videos (not really him raging but he appeals to the dumber mgtows) and Turd Flinging Monkey who has far more autistic pseudo intellectual videos which are less mgtow specific and closer to the alt right in general
Basically it's just a rip-off of radical feminism/lesbian seperatism a la Andrea Dworkin, but with the sexes reversed. (e.x. "Gender is an oppressive matriarchal social construct; men should be overweight and hairy slobs because trying to make yourself attractive to women gives them power over you, etc).
 
Not sure if he's been mentioned before, but apparently some "IndispensiblePeaGuy" is calling out Kiwi Farms specifically for being anti-MGTOW:


It's nice having fans. @CatParty , he seems to like you in particular, though I admittedly didn't have the patience to watch more than 3 minutes into this.
 
Not sure whether to put this here or in Youtube commenters but it made me laugh.

014e973888315e07c7cc00e30609fde1.png
 
No joke, my little brother once saw a man with a license plate that said MGTOW on it. He was going to get a pic but the guy drove away.
Was it a nice car since MGTOWs always espouse that now that they dont have fucking cunts like women and sex and relationships and friends siphoning away all their money, they can afford the shit they REALLY want (not relationships, love, and friends)?

Or was it a piece of shit junker like I'm imagining because MGTOWs are all invariably losers who nobody wanted anyway; balding, 40 year old middle-management nobodies that wasted their life and are bitter about it?
 
MGTOW are bad and hilarious but they're bad and hilarious exactly for having the kind of message many of you here don't disagree with (at least not when it's not about them). And that message is that these men can go without women. Of course, that's nonsense.

This doesn't mean that Western women are not irredeemable or utter scum one can't be in a relationship with, and that they don't deserve only the worst humiliations. But that's another story. If you can't leave the West you must punish them and not just say "eh, I'm better off without them".

Original MGTOW had been created by men who weren't virgins and wanted men to walk their own way in terms of societal expectations like treatment of women in a feminist way. Well, guess what? Not treating women with respect is exactly what gets them off. Modern Western women are scum. But who overtook MGTOW now? Virgins did. It's really silly. Original MGTOWs are ashamed of the current MGTOW. Matt Forney had a good article on this.

Also, I want to mention something that somebody said on r/Incels thread. They said I'm a liberal because I said modern Western women deserve to be raped, just like liberals believe for some sacred classes.

But that is the difference !

A liberal wants any kind of a Western woman raped and killed by blacks and Guatos, even the good Western women like Amish or Orthodox Jews, because a liberal believes all Western women are to be punished for the lack of privilege sacreds have.

Somebody like me wants the sluts to be raped and killed, but given that basically every female n the Western society is a slut sluts and Western women are basically a synonym, though I'd recommend the use of the term "Western sluts".

But a liberal would never be for the rape and murder of modern Western women by classes they hate, like white Western males ! I, on the other hand, don't hate white males and don't think that they shouldn't be entitled to rape and this should only be given to Sacreds who lack privilege. A liberal, however, sees ANY sex a straight white male has as rape, even that sex that isn't rape.

One more aspect of this is that I understand that modern Western women like to be raped, and that rape is no punishment to them at all but even so rape is a good way to satisfy your sexual desire.

There's another difference. It's true that I basically don't care even if a Western female baby is raped but that's because I believe that there's basically no chance she might become decent. But a liberal is for rape of all Western females of all ages by Sacreds, even nuns. I don't stand for that. I stand for rape and murder of sluts.

If somebody came to me and said "There is a 50 or even just 20 percent chance this female toddler won't became a worthless slut, should it be raped?" I'd say that it is better not to rape such a toddler. But such convictions fall apart when the chance is something like 0.0001 percent.

But a liberal wants every white female toddler to be raped and skinned alive, even if they would all be of saintly behavior, because a liberal sees it through race and privilege, not actual behavior.
 
Also, I want to mention something that somebody said on r/Incels thread. They said I'm a liberal because I said modern Western women deserve to be raped, just like liberals believe for some sacred classes.

But that is the difference !

A liberal wants any kind of a Western woman raped and killed by blacks and Guatos, even the good Western women like Amish or Orthodox Jews, because a liberal believes all Western women are to be punished for the lack of privilege sacreds have.

Somebody like me wants the sluts to be raped and killed, but given that basically every female n the Western society is a slut sluts and Western women are basically a synonym, though I'd recommend the use of the term "Western sluts".

But a liberal would never be for the rape and murder of modern Western women by classes they hate, like white Western males ! I, on the other hand, don't hate white males and don't think that they shouldn't be entitled to rape and this should only be given to Sacreds who lack privilege. A liberal, however, sees ANY sex a straight white male has as rape, even that sex that isn't rape.

One more aspect of this is that I understand that modern Western women like to be raped, and that rape is no punishment to them at all but even so rape is a good way to satisfy your sexual desire.

There's another difference. It's true that I basically don't care even if a Western female baby is raped but that's because I believe that there's basically no chance she might become decent. But a liberal is for rape of all Western females of all ages by Sacreds, even nuns. I don't stand for that. I stand for rape and murder of sluts.

If somebody came to me and said "There is a 50 or even just 20 percent chance this female toddler won't became a worthless slut, should it be raped?" I'd say that it is better not to rape such a toddler. But such convictions fall apart when the chance is something like 0.0001 percent.

But a liberal wants every white female toddler to be raped and skinned alive, even if they would all be of saintly behavior, because a liberal sees it through race and privilege, not actual behavior.
lol calm down
 
Another important aspect of this difference is that I would surely never be for rape of my family members who aren't feminist. But a liberal would want every member of his family, even the most feminist ones (meaning those most like them !) raped and skinned alive because it doesn't matter to a liberal - she is white and thereby deserves anything she has coming to her. If you're white you must die, according to a liberal.
 
The greater problem is that they themselves want to be raped, but that is less of an issue. Simply denying that makes manginas funny and only potentially harmful if they spread their dangerous ideology to young men who actually buy into the bullshit that modern Western women want anything but rape.

What's, however, really disgusting is these liberals who would give everybody white and female to be skinned alive and cry the tears of joy while this happens while blaming white men for even gazing at women. Even gazing is rape.
 
The greater problem is that they themselves want to be raped, but that is less of an issue. Simply denying that makes manginas funny and only potentially harmful if they spread their dangerous ideology to young men who actually buy into the bullshit that modern Western women want anything but rape.

What's, however, really disgusting is these liberals who would give everybody white and female to be skinned alive and cry the tears of joy while this happens while blaming white men for even gazing at women. Even gazing is rape.

Well you really went out of your way to earn this one, @Marjan Šiklić is thread banned permanently.
 
Back