Disaster Microplastics are infiltrating brain tissue, studies show: ‘There’s nowhere left untouched’ - Twenty-four brain samples collected in early 2024 measured on average about 0.5% plastic by weight

Source / Archive
Douglas Main
Wed 21 Aug 2024 15.00 CEST, Last modified on Thu 22 Aug 2024 22.13 CEST

A growing body of scientific evidence shows that microplastics are accumulating in critical human organs, including the brain, leading researchers to call for more urgent actions to rein in plastic pollution.
Studies have detected tiny shards and specks of plastics in human lungs, placentas, reproductive organs, livers, kidneys, knee and elbow joints, blood vessels and bone marrow.

Given the research findings, “it is now imperative to declare a global emergency” to deal with plastic pollution, said Sedat Gündoğdu, who studies microplastics at Cukurova University in Turkey.
Humans are exposed to microplastics – defined as fragments smaller than 5mm in diameter – and the chemicals used to make plastics from widespread plastic pollution in air, water and even food.
"There’s much more plastic in our brains than I ever would have imagined or been comfortable with" Matthew Campen, University of New Mexico

The health hazards of microplastics within the human body are not yet well-known. Recent studies are just beginning to suggest they could increase the risk of various conditions such as oxidative stress, which can lead to cell damage and inflammation, as well as cardiovascular disease.

Animal studies have also linked microplastics to fertility issues, various cancers, a disrupted endocrine and immune system, and impaired learning and memory.

There are currently no governmental standards for plastic particles in food or water in the United States. The Environmental Protection Agency is working on crafting guidelines for measuring them, and has been giving out grants since 2018 to develop new ways to quickly detect and quantify them.

Finding microplastics in more and more human organs “raises a lot of concerns”, given what we know about health effects in animals, studies of human cells in the lab, and emerging epidemiological studies, said Bethanie Carney Almroth, an ecotoxicologist at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. “It’s scary, I’d say.”

The pre-print brain study led by Campen also hinted at a concerning link. In the study, researchers looked at 12 brain samples from people who had died with dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease. These brains contained up to 10 times more plastic by weight than healthy samples. (The latest version of Campen’s study, which contains these findings, was not yet posted online when this story was published.)

“I don’t know how much more plastic our brain can stuff in without it causing some problems,” Campen said.

The paper also found the quantity of microplastics in brain samples from 2024 was about 50% higher from the total in samples that date to 2016, suggesting the concentration of microplastics found in human brains is rising at a similar rate to that found in the environment. Most of the organs came from the office of the medical investigator in Albuquerque, New Mexico, which investigates untimely or violent deaths.

“You can draw a line – it’s increasing over time. It’s consistent with what you’re seeing in the environment,” Campen said.

Many other papers have found microplastics in the brains of other animal species, so it’s not entirely surprising the same could be true for humans, said Almroth of the University of Gothenburg, who was not involved in the paper.

When it comes to these insidious particles, “the blood-brain barrier is not as protective as we’d like to think”, Almroth said, referring to the series of membranes that keep many chemicals and pathogens from reaching the central nervous system.

Explosion of research​

Adding to the concerns about accumulation in the human body, the Journal of Hazardous Materials published a study last month that found microplastics in all 16 samples of bone marrow examined, the first paper of its kind. All the samples contained polystyrene, used to make packing for peanuts and electronics, and almost all contained polyethylene, used in clear food wrap, detergent bottles and other common household products.

Another recent paper looking at 45 patients undergoing hip or knee surgery in Beijing, China, found microplastics in the membranous lining of every single hip or knee joint examined.

A study published on 15 May in the journal Toxicological Sciences found microplastics in all 23 human and 47 canine testicles studied, finding that samples from people had a nearly threefold greater concentration than those from dogs. A higher quantity of certain types of plastic particles – including polyethylene, the main component of plastic water bottles – correlated with lower testicular weights in dogs.

‘Pretty alarming’​

In one of the latest studies to emerge – a pre-print paper still undergoing peer review that is posted online by the National Institutes of Health – researchers found a particularly concerning accumulation of microplastics in brain samples.

An examination of the livers, kidneys and brains of autopsied bodies found that all contained microplastics, but the 91 brain samples contained on average about 10 to 20 times more than the other organs. The results came as a shock, according to the study’s lead author Matthew Campen, a toxicologist and professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of New Mexico.

The researchers found that 24 of the brain samples, which were collected in early 2024, measured on average about 0.5% plastic by weight.

“It’s pretty alarming,” Campen said. “There’s much more plastic in our brains than I ever would have imagined or been comfortable with.”

The study describes the brain as “one of the most plastic-polluted tissues yet sampled”.

Another paper, which appeared on 19 June in the International Journal of Impotence Research, detected plastic particles in the penises of four out of five men getting penile implants to treat erectile dysfunction.

“The potential health effects are concerning, especially considering the unknown long-term consequences of microplastics accumulating in sensitive tissues like the reproductive organs,” said Ranjith Ramasamy, the study’s lead author and a medical researcher and urologist at the University of Miami.

Meanwhile, a Chinese group published a study in May showing small quantities of microplastics in the semen of all 40 participants. An Italian paper from a few months prior reported similar results.

A handful of studies have also now found contamination in human placentas. A study that appeared in the May issue of Toxicological Sciences reported finding micro- and nanoplastics in all 62 placental samples, though the concentration ranged widely.

In Italy, researchers followed 312 patients who had fatty deposits, or plaques, removed from their carotid artery. Almost six in 10 had microplastics, and these people fared worse than those who did not: Over the next 34 months, they were 2.1 times as likely to experience a heart attack or stroke, or die.

‘Nowhere left untouched’​

The Food and Drug Administration says in a statement on its website that “current scientific evidence does not demonstrate that levels of microplastics or nanoplastics detected in foods pose a risk to human health.”

Still, researchers say that individuals should try to reduce their exposure by avoiding the use of plastic in preparing food, especially when microwaving; drinking tap water instead of bottled water; and trying to prevent the accumulation of dust, which is contaminated with plastics. Some researchers advise eating less meat, especially processed products.

Leonardo Trasande, a medical researcher at New York University, said much remains unknown about the impacts of microplastic accumulation in humans. The negative health impacts of chemicals used in plastics, such as phthalates, are better established, though, he said. A study he co-authored found exposure to phthalates had increased the risk of cardiovascular disease and death in the United States, causing $39bn or more in lost productivity per year.

Microplastic particles can be contaminated with and carry such chemicals into the body. “The micro- and nanoplastics may be effective delivery systems for toxic chemicals,” Trasande said.

The American Chemistry Council, which represents plastic and chemical manufacturers, did not directly respond to questions about the recent studies finding microplastics in human organs. Kimberly Wise White, a vice-president with the group, noted that “the global plastics industry is dedicated to advancing the scientific understanding of microplastics”.

The United Nations Environment Assembly agreed two years ago to begin working toward a global treaty to end plastic pollution, a process that is ongoing.

Several news reports in the last week suggest that the Biden administration has signaled that the US delegation involved in the discussions will support measures to reduce global production of plastics, which researchers say is critical to getting a handle on the problem.

“There’s nowhere left untouched from the deep sea to the atmosphere to the human brain,” Almroth said.

This story is co-published with the New Lede, a journalism project of the Environmental Working Group
 
Even if all consumer grade plastics were banned today the damage is done. This will not go away, not in our lifetime, not in the one of our children. This will stay for potentially millions of years, eternally contaminating this planet. And not one of the peddlers of this literal toxic shit will ask themselves: what have we done?
This overlooks the fact that plastic exposed to sunlight and the elements breaks down relatively quickly through photodegradation and mechanical abrasion. This process causes plastic to fragment into microplastics and nanoplastics.

These smaller particles continue to break down through biological and chemical processes, with some microbes even metabolizing certain plastics. However, as these particles shrink to microscopic sizes, they begin integrating with biological systems, where they pose the most harm. These tiny fragments can enter food chains and cause health issues, making their impact more dangerous despite their reduced size.

Once all those micro and nanoplastics have turned into cancerous tumors, they are gone.
Do your part, grow that microplastic tumor.
 
There are currently no governmental standards for plastic particles in food or water in the United States. The Environmental Protection Agency is working on crafting guidelines for measuring them, and has been giving out grants since 2018 to develop new ways to quickly detect and quantify them.

The Food and Drug Administration says in a statement on its website that “current scientific evidence does not demonstrate that levels of microplastics or nanoplastics detected in foods pose a risk to human health.”

RFK nuking these agencies for Trump cannot come soon enough!
 
Time for Arcology:
1000002863.jpg
 
Even if all consumer grade plastics were banned today the damage is done. This will not go away, not in our lifetime, not in the one of our children. This will stay for potentially millions of years, eternally contaminating this planet. And not one of the peddlers of this literal toxic shit will ask themselves: what have we done?
I don't think there's a material on Earth we can create at this point that doesn't in some way contaminate the human body. The only one I can think of is glass and well, that's not very reliable.
 
Ideonella sakaiensis munches certain plastics. It was apparently discovered in 2016 so I guess one did or we had just never noticed it before.
Nice. So natures on it.
I don't think there's a material on Earth we can create at this point that doesn't in some way contaminate the human body. The only one I can think of is glass and well, that's not very reliable.
Ceramics? Stainless steel ? Both Ok for cookware (hopefully.) I think even the silicone bakeware is bad at high temps.

I guess a huge amount comes from bits that slough off packaging and we ingest.
I’m trying to reduce plastic in the house. I’ve got beeswax wraps (easy to make at home if anyone wants a recipe) instead of cling wrap, all the non stick stuff is gone and I only use cast iron, stainless steel or ceramic/enamel to cook or store in. We try to avoid takeout type packaging that has paper with the plastic thin liners. Steel drinks bottles (although if you get the double walled ones most are sealed at the base with lead solder so be careful. Yes even those trendy Stanley cup ones.) local supermarket does paper bags for fruit and veg.
It’s almost impossible to avoid it completely though,
 
I don't think there's a material on Earth we can create at this point that doesn't in some way contaminate the human body. The only one I can think of is glass and well, that's not very reliable.
Glass at least has the virtue of its primary ingredient (not its only ingredient, I know there's additives n whatnot but they're only a few weight % IIRC) is fucking quartz. IE, one of the most chemically inert minerals to exist. Yes, it can be dissolved in water at a comically low rate, but AFAIK it has exactly zero properties that would lead any biological systems to think that 'hey that silicon oxygen tetrahedron would go great as part of this nerve tissue!' or something like that. The only shit that'll dissolve quartz fast are industrial-grade caustics produced in chemical factories and not by nature: aqua regia (sulfuric plus hydrochloric acids for double your fun) and hydrofluoric acid (HCl's nastier cousin).

I do think that the change to plastic has to be permanent for a lot of applications...but that anything involving food and drink absolutely should go back to glass. But what do I know?
 
If governments wanted to actually make a fight on pollution, they'd force most food businesses to make their products with glass and paper instead of plastic. But glass is more expensive than plastic to make so it'll never happen
There's the simple fact that if more food companies used glass, niggers would be more able to stab people.
 
"Muh environment" people only care about swapping to recycled plastics or introducing paper (laden with plastic) to virtue signal. Not one motherfucker wants to go back to glass, which can be heavily recycled, is natural and cheap as fuck to make.
Who else is doing anything against plastic use except those environmentalists?

It seems just very meh to shit on exactly the people who for decades had the right idea, but never the support to pull anything off expect for token incentives. Most microplastics seems to originate from synthetic fibers or tires.

If you go against synthetic fibers I can already see the Fox News/Dailymail headline: "Green fanatics are making your clothing more expensive". And it will be posted here and people will shit on those people with comments "They really hate you and want you dead" and the like. The not spoken issue though is that synthetic fibers come with the pollution issue, which has a price tag of it's own.
The same is true for ideas to reduce the number of cars and so on. But you are reading here as well. You get the idea.

The zero waste movement is decades old and they had the right idea. We are at the point where those very same envrionemtalists are building their own retail store networks to cope with the fact that nobody else is giving a fuck besides being mad at the internet whenever the consequences of plastic use are pointed out.

"Just build your own grocery stores, if you don't like the offered plastic selection :smug:"


Behold. They even use glass containers.

And the worst of all. They got nothing for being right all the time. They are still getting the same consequences like everybody else and the only thing they can do is being a moralfaggot, which makes everyone hate them more and thus leads to rejection of any idea they are putting forward.

It's all pretty gay.
 
I don't think there's a material on Earth we can create at this point that doesn't in some way contaminate the human body. The only one I can think of is glass and well, that's not very reliable.
Glass has been used as a reliable container for water and foodstuff for thousands of years, until the Tupperware craze of the 50s and 60s. As with everything else these days you can safely blame boomers for this bullshit and how glass fell out of favor for lines going up forever (cancer rates and profits).
 
I wonder if eventually there will evolve bacteria that just eat environmental plastic
There will be

There are already bacteria that eat oil.

Don't forget about the heavy metals saturating the environment too

Nice. So natures on it.

Ceramics? Stainless steel ? Both Ok for cookware (hopefully.) I think even the silicone bakeware is bad at high temps.

I guess a huge amount comes from bits that slough off packaging and we ingest.
I’m trying to reduce plastic in the house. I’ve got beeswax wraps (easy to make at home if anyone wants a recipe) instead of cling wrap, all the non stick stuff is gone and I only use cast iron, stainless steel or ceramic/enamel to cook or store in. We try to avoid takeout type packaging that has paper with the plastic thin liners. Steel drinks bottles (although if you get the double walled ones most are sealed at the base with lead solder so be careful. Yes even those trendy Stanley cup ones.) local supermarket does paper bags for fruit and veg.
It’s almost impossible to avoid it completely though,
Food storage can be easily transitioned into glass as well. Extremely easily.
 
Back