Disaster Microplastics are infiltrating brain tissue, studies show: ‘There’s nowhere left untouched’ - Twenty-four brain samples collected in early 2024 measured on average about 0.5% plastic by weight

Source / Archive
Douglas Main
Wed 21 Aug 2024 15.00 CEST, Last modified on Thu 22 Aug 2024 22.13 CEST

A growing body of scientific evidence shows that microplastics are accumulating in critical human organs, including the brain, leading researchers to call for more urgent actions to rein in plastic pollution.
Studies have detected tiny shards and specks of plastics in human lungs, placentas, reproductive organs, livers, kidneys, knee and elbow joints, blood vessels and bone marrow.

Given the research findings, “it is now imperative to declare a global emergency” to deal with plastic pollution, said Sedat Gündoğdu, who studies microplastics at Cukurova University in Turkey.
Humans are exposed to microplastics – defined as fragments smaller than 5mm in diameter – and the chemicals used to make plastics from widespread plastic pollution in air, water and even food.
"There’s much more plastic in our brains than I ever would have imagined or been comfortable with" Matthew Campen, University of New Mexico

The health hazards of microplastics within the human body are not yet well-known. Recent studies are just beginning to suggest they could increase the risk of various conditions such as oxidative stress, which can lead to cell damage and inflammation, as well as cardiovascular disease.

Animal studies have also linked microplastics to fertility issues, various cancers, a disrupted endocrine and immune system, and impaired learning and memory.

There are currently no governmental standards for plastic particles in food or water in the United States. The Environmental Protection Agency is working on crafting guidelines for measuring them, and has been giving out grants since 2018 to develop new ways to quickly detect and quantify them.

Finding microplastics in more and more human organs “raises a lot of concerns”, given what we know about health effects in animals, studies of human cells in the lab, and emerging epidemiological studies, said Bethanie Carney Almroth, an ecotoxicologist at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. “It’s scary, I’d say.”

The pre-print brain study led by Campen also hinted at a concerning link. In the study, researchers looked at 12 brain samples from people who had died with dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease. These brains contained up to 10 times more plastic by weight than healthy samples. (The latest version of Campen’s study, which contains these findings, was not yet posted online when this story was published.)

“I don’t know how much more plastic our brain can stuff in without it causing some problems,” Campen said.

The paper also found the quantity of microplastics in brain samples from 2024 was about 50% higher from the total in samples that date to 2016, suggesting the concentration of microplastics found in human brains is rising at a similar rate to that found in the environment. Most of the organs came from the office of the medical investigator in Albuquerque, New Mexico, which investigates untimely or violent deaths.

“You can draw a line – it’s increasing over time. It’s consistent with what you’re seeing in the environment,” Campen said.

Many other papers have found microplastics in the brains of other animal species, so it’s not entirely surprising the same could be true for humans, said Almroth of the University of Gothenburg, who was not involved in the paper.

When it comes to these insidious particles, “the blood-brain barrier is not as protective as we’d like to think”, Almroth said, referring to the series of membranes that keep many chemicals and pathogens from reaching the central nervous system.

Explosion of research​

Adding to the concerns about accumulation in the human body, the Journal of Hazardous Materials published a study last month that found microplastics in all 16 samples of bone marrow examined, the first paper of its kind. All the samples contained polystyrene, used to make packing for peanuts and electronics, and almost all contained polyethylene, used in clear food wrap, detergent bottles and other common household products.

Another recent paper looking at 45 patients undergoing hip or knee surgery in Beijing, China, found microplastics in the membranous lining of every single hip or knee joint examined.

A study published on 15 May in the journal Toxicological Sciences found microplastics in all 23 human and 47 canine testicles studied, finding that samples from people had a nearly threefold greater concentration than those from dogs. A higher quantity of certain types of plastic particles – including polyethylene, the main component of plastic water bottles – correlated with lower testicular weights in dogs.

‘Pretty alarming’​

In one of the latest studies to emerge – a pre-print paper still undergoing peer review that is posted online by the National Institutes of Health – researchers found a particularly concerning accumulation of microplastics in brain samples.

An examination of the livers, kidneys and brains of autopsied bodies found that all contained microplastics, but the 91 brain samples contained on average about 10 to 20 times more than the other organs. The results came as a shock, according to the study’s lead author Matthew Campen, a toxicologist and professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of New Mexico.

The researchers found that 24 of the brain samples, which were collected in early 2024, measured on average about 0.5% plastic by weight.

“It’s pretty alarming,” Campen said. “There’s much more plastic in our brains than I ever would have imagined or been comfortable with.”

The study describes the brain as “one of the most plastic-polluted tissues yet sampled”.

Another paper, which appeared on 19 June in the International Journal of Impotence Research, detected plastic particles in the penises of four out of five men getting penile implants to treat erectile dysfunction.

“The potential health effects are concerning, especially considering the unknown long-term consequences of microplastics accumulating in sensitive tissues like the reproductive organs,” said Ranjith Ramasamy, the study’s lead author and a medical researcher and urologist at the University of Miami.

Meanwhile, a Chinese group published a study in May showing small quantities of microplastics in the semen of all 40 participants. An Italian paper from a few months prior reported similar results.

A handful of studies have also now found contamination in human placentas. A study that appeared in the May issue of Toxicological Sciences reported finding micro- and nanoplastics in all 62 placental samples, though the concentration ranged widely.

In Italy, researchers followed 312 patients who had fatty deposits, or plaques, removed from their carotid artery. Almost six in 10 had microplastics, and these people fared worse than those who did not: Over the next 34 months, they were 2.1 times as likely to experience a heart attack or stroke, or die.

‘Nowhere left untouched’​

The Food and Drug Administration says in a statement on its website that “current scientific evidence does not demonstrate that levels of microplastics or nanoplastics detected in foods pose a risk to human health.”

Still, researchers say that individuals should try to reduce their exposure by avoiding the use of plastic in preparing food, especially when microwaving; drinking tap water instead of bottled water; and trying to prevent the accumulation of dust, which is contaminated with plastics. Some researchers advise eating less meat, especially processed products.

Leonardo Trasande, a medical researcher at New York University, said much remains unknown about the impacts of microplastic accumulation in humans. The negative health impacts of chemicals used in plastics, such as phthalates, are better established, though, he said. A study he co-authored found exposure to phthalates had increased the risk of cardiovascular disease and death in the United States, causing $39bn or more in lost productivity per year.

Microplastic particles can be contaminated with and carry such chemicals into the body. “The micro- and nanoplastics may be effective delivery systems for toxic chemicals,” Trasande said.

The American Chemistry Council, which represents plastic and chemical manufacturers, did not directly respond to questions about the recent studies finding microplastics in human organs. Kimberly Wise White, a vice-president with the group, noted that “the global plastics industry is dedicated to advancing the scientific understanding of microplastics”.

The United Nations Environment Assembly agreed two years ago to begin working toward a global treaty to end plastic pollution, a process that is ongoing.

Several news reports in the last week suggest that the Biden administration has signaled that the US delegation involved in the discussions will support measures to reduce global production of plastics, which researchers say is critical to getting a handle on the problem.

“There’s nowhere left untouched from the deep sea to the atmosphere to the human brain,” Almroth said.

This story is co-published with the New Lede, a journalism project of the Environmental Working Group
 
The zero waste movement is decades old and they had the right idea
They did, and reduce reuse recycle is a good philosophy. My problem with the green movement now is that it’s no longer about living simply and sustainably, but about one type of person having the ability to consume while everyone else is forcibly reduced to serfdom. I say this as (I thought, before my worldview was recessed as nazism) a recycling, own clothes making, organic food growing lentil weaving hippy.
There are so many good ways we could change to more sustainable systems but the ONLY push now is carbon-as-control and all the systems are control as well. The 15 min cities are control, it’s all about control and nothing to do with environmentalism. If we were truly environmentalist we’d be doing a whole different set of actions
Don't forget about the heavy metals saturating the environment too
Plants may be able to help with remediation of this as well. Sunflowers are very good at sequestering metals in the soil, so are things like comfrey and lavender. Plant, incinerate and recover metals could be a way forward
Glass food storage is something we do - even ikea sell the glass Tupperware style boxes now. Glass jars and jugs for liquids
 
what's funny is salt has been busting giant holes into peoples lips from products like chips and it's been assumed to be a microplastic or worse contamination that the public has downplayed before 2013.

your lips swell with blisters after consuming the contaminated salt, table salt won't do the same, it's this powdery fine salt they put on chips.

other people have reported a swelling in the lips that lasts for days and even bursts a small hole into the lip from the blister causing a pocket deep within the upper or lower lip.

this has been downplayed thousands of times as "salt allergies" for individuals without proper examination into if the salt they ate was contaminated by microplastic, chlorine, or other contaminates.

I also had to stop eating chips a long time ago because of the salt on them causing a severe reaction on my lips.
home made corn chips don't need salt, I make corn chips without salt and. they don't bother my lips, and I can eat a ton of them.
if I eat one frito though, I'll have a blister on my lip that lasts over a week. it starts to hurt so bad, even my teeth hurt.

like many others, I was downplayed and convinced that I just had an individual salt allergy, rather than them believing anything was wrong with the chips.
in a nutshell, the salt they put on chips is cheaper than the regular salt you buy from the store.
and both have microplastic problems.

there is never enough testing done for anything, because there never is.

don't even get me started on fish, you'll never catch a clean fish ever again.
I think we'll need to clone a genetically modified fish for it to be clean now.
and trust me, the fish will all just die off before anyone fixes anything wrong.
 
Yeah we’re all going to die just like from
Overpopulation
Erosion of the ozone layer
Acid rain
Silent spring
Global cooling
Global warming
Your username, the sound of a drooling retard, fits you quite well my friend.

How does it feel to not understand how anything works and to be so confident despite that?
 
I wonder if eventually there will evolve bacteria that just eat environmental plastic
We've already managed to get the structures of a few enzymes that can degrade polymers, site directed mutagenesis is going to be the next step. A few years ago I remember my PI at the time showing me this paper. This might be my personal bias shining through, but I think an answer if not the answer to microplastics will be enzymes modified to have specific substrates and to make easier to handle products for recycling. Issue is I think the vector, scale, etc.
 
There are so many good ways we could change to more sustainable systems but the ONLY push now is carbon-as-control and all the systems are control as well. The 15 min cities are control, it’s all about control and nothing to do with environmentalism. If we were truly environmentalist we’d be doing a whole different set of actions
What would those proposals be for microplastics?

15 minutes cities aim at reducing cars and therefore less microplastics from tires in addition to improvements on other enviromental issues. In that case you remove the source (And the oil supplychain which also contributes to the issue).

Which proposals are out there that works without additional controls? Also I will obviously ask for the effectivness of those proposals. If they are implemented somewhere and at what cost.
 
PL I ate a fish I captured from a pond a little while ago and it had little flat plastic flakes inside it's flesh. This little fish had somehow absorbed plastic into itself but I ate it anyways because I was hungry; After eating the entire fish I spent hours picking plastic flakes out from under my teeth using a needle. It was not fun!
Those are bones retard.
 
Who else is doing anything against plastic use except those environmentalists?

It seems just very meh to shit on exactly the people who for decades had the right idea, but never the support to pull anything off expect for token incentives. Most microplastics seems to originate from synthetic fibers or tires.

If you go against synthetic fibers I can already see the Fox News/Dailymail headline: "Green fanatics are making your clothing more expensive". And it will be posted here and people will shit on those people with comments "They really hate you and want you dead" and the like. The not spoken issue though is that synthetic fibers come with the pollution issue, which has a price tag of it's own.
The same is true for ideas to reduce the number of cars and so on. But you are reading here as well. You get the idea.

The zero waste movement is decades old and they had the right idea. We are at the point where those very same envrionemtalists are building their own retail store networks to cope with the fact that nobody else is giving a fuck besides being mad at the internet whenever the consequences of plastic use are pointed out.

"Just build your own grocery stores, if you don't like the offered plastic selection :smug:"


Behold. They even use glass containers.

And the worst of all. They got nothing for being right all the time. They are still getting the same consequences like everybody else and the only thing they can do is being a moralfaggot, which makes everyone hate them more and thus leads to rejection of any idea they are putting forward.

It's all pretty gay.
I agree with the concept of recycle everything, I disagree with changing the types of plastic we did use because of bad chemicals, when those plastics were more recyclable and easier to manufacture. PVC vs PET, for example.

I'm right behind the hippies when it comes to waste, nothing infuriates me more than a lazy company doing the tiniest of upgrades to a product and convincing the consooomers to bin their old shit (LOOKING AT YOU APPLE YOU CUNTS). The route cause of all wastage and problems with the environment stem from planned obsolescence and graph must go up.

Anyone against modular upgrades to avoid building new products, building products that can't be easily repair or modularly replaced and living a consooming "waste not repair" mindset should be minced up and fed to horses.
 
This overlooks the fact that plastic exposed to sunlight and the elements breaks down relatively quickly through photodegradation and mechanical abrasion. This process causes plastic to fragment into microplastics and nanoplastics.

These smaller particles continue to break down through biological and chemical processes, with some microbes even metabolizing certain plastics. However, as these particles shrink to microscopic sizes, they begin integrating with biological systems, where they pose the most harm. These tiny fragments can enter food chains and cause health issues, making their impact more dangerous despite their reduced size.

Once all those micro and nanoplastics have turned into cancerous tumors, they are gone.
Do your part, grow that microplastic tumor.
Coming back for this one: cancer IS the answer? I'd rather not think about the wider implications here...
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Tall Man
All plastic packaging should have biodegradable plastic that decomposes within provably fifty years.
nerfing plastic in general to appease environmental concerns is gonna be a recipe for disaster. Mold already can grow on the stuff in the right conditions, now picture what happens when shit being "biodegradable" becomes the standard. consoom more product, same supplies used, inability to reuse the supplies because you made it so it fucking begins falling to tiny micro pieces. Plastic isn't something that can truly biodegrade by nature of what it's made of from unless I'm remembering this wrong.
Gotta remind myself to use disposable plastic window box containers in more art shit later, it's paradoxically cheaper than actually seeking and buying actual plastic sheets. not gonna pay 100for one large slightly textured sheet of plastic from a chinese seller amazon, thanks.

This just sounds like the next push to get people to get in the pod and eat the boogs to me. Less than 2 years ago I never heard the term 'microplastic' now it's everywhere?
It's real and it fucking sucks but it's less due to people throwing out plastic waste or using plastic based products and more the end result of corpos shredding shitloads of waste plastic and dumping it everywhere to nightmare levels we can't really feasibly measure. They're never going to be held accountable no it's US that are killing the planet so we gotta have paper straws, no disposable bags to carry shit in out of a store risking security frisk or mugging if you're in a bad area, or a number of other increasingly absurd draconian actions that will lead to "live in the pod eat the bugs" but will not stop the mass dumping of waste into every hole and water source imaginable.
 
. Mold already can grow on the stuff in the right conditions, now picture what happens when shit being "biodegradable" becomes the standard.
After looking more into it, biodegradable plastics are fucked up.
I think I remember reading scientists were creating species of bacteria and fungi that could eat plastic PET/PE. We should invest into breeding these and genetically modifying them to eat even more types of plastic.
 
After looking more into it, biodegradable plastics are fucked up.
I think I remember reading scientists were creating species of bacteria and fungi that could eat plastic PET/PE. We should invest into breeding these and genetically modifying them to eat even more types of plastic.
That'd be worse! The fact they already bred some level of them into being able to do that years ago was intriguing but even back then I was thinking "ok but if this gets loose we're fucked with how reliant we are on the stuff for Infrastructure" Like that shit aside from the concrete and metal also has copius amounts of plastic. You take micro organisms that flourish in a moist environment and already grow on PVC pipes and give them the ability to eat plastic? goodbye to a good chunk of water system or just safe water in general if they become a type that releases mycotoxins that affect humans.

Ideally I think the best thing to do would be to find a way to gather plastic waste and reuse it somehow rather than shredding unsold plastic items and dumping them everywhere and then trying to solve that by breeding shit to destroy your own tools.
 
Last edited:
All of us have holes in our brain

And if they can penetrate the bloodbrain barrier they can definitely end up in a fetus

So explains zoomers I guess
 
All of us have holes in our brain
I don't commit cannibalism or consume animals with prion disease, thank you very much!

And if they can penetrate the bloodbrain barrier they can definitely end up in a fetus

So explains zoomers I guess
Could be lmao, but I'm pretty sure it's more an indoctrination machine and ignorance thing than a "tiny plastic particles" thing.

Now, the spike in cancer? Maybe.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Moths
They did, and reduce reuse recycle is a good philosophy. My problem with the green movement now is that it’s no longer about living simply and sustainably, but about one type of person having the ability to consume while everyone else is forcibly reduced to serfdom. I say this as (I thought, before my worldview was recessed as nazism) a recycling, own clothes making, organic food growing lentil weaving hippy.
There are so many good ways we could change to more sustainable systems but the ONLY push now is carbon-as-control and all the systems are control as well. The 15 min cities are control, it’s all about control and nothing to do with environmentalism. If we were truly environmentalist we’d be doing a whole different set of actions

Plants may be able to help with remediation of this as well. Sunflowers are very good at sequestering metals in the soil, so are things like comfrey and lavender. Plant, incinerate and recover metals could be a way forward
Glass food storage is something we do - even ikea sell the glass Tupperware style boxes now. Glass jars and jugs for liquids

It just sucks that so many products that used to come in glass now are in plastic. And the plastic gets flimsier every year so you can't reuse it much. It becomes a useless throwaway container. Some products are better than others. But it would be nice to see a return to glass. You don't even see many foods wrapped in foil or wax paper now. I remember how fun it was to gently press the foil across candy bars to get an impression of the logo.
 
It just sucks that so many products that used to come in glass now are in plastic. And the plastic gets flimsier every year so you can't reuse it much. It becomes a useless throwaway container. Some products are better than others. But it would be nice to see a return to glass.
Look up micro glass particles lmao. Same exact "issue" as microplastics but in glass flavor. I just looked it up and the results are weirdly not related but it might be the search engine I used because one of the results IS about it basically being wedged in bodies/poisoning marine life.
 
Back