Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[Mikemikev]

So it does come down to behavior. I can understand where that can be construed as that. But here the thing about that, what would happen that we supplant a (one) person that came from a race that was inherently violent into a place that is does not condone or anything that reinforces the culture that person came from. That person would change, reguardless of race. Its called adaptation something that the human race is very good at and that leads me to another question. How do you factor in adaptation?

Well no often they don't change. A heritability estimate is based on a given environment and any totally culture modifiable traits are by definition non-genetic. But we see a whole range of traits which manifest in general by race at least in part rather than culture. Eg. IQ, lactose tolerance, are largely or wholly familial and not cultural.

 

[Flustercuck]

600 pages and mikey is still rabiatly gurgling words like a sped

 

[Mikemikev]

600 pages and mikey is still rabiatly gurgling words like a sped

I've never seen you write anything interesting.

 

[unclestryker]

Eg. IQ, lactose tolerance, are largely or wholly familial and not cultural.

Yeah again these are biological differences eg. stuff you cannot change. So my question still stands, how do you factor adaptation?

 

[Flustercuck]

I've never seen you write anything interesting.

me neither tbh fam

 

[Mikemikev]

Yeah again these are biological differences eg. stuff you cannot change. So my question still stands, how do you factor adaptation?

"Adaptation" isn't the term you're looking for. It's environmental modification or simply non-genetic. Your question was about the trait of violence. You didn't show it's 100% non-genetic across cultures. I don't have time to answer your endless questions. Go to college or read some books or something. Try Sesardic, Rushton, Jensen, Gottfredson, Harpending, Dawkins, etc.

This is also very good, of which I was a minor reviewer.

http://humanvarieties.org/2015/06/19/nature-of-race-published/

 

[unclestryker]

Your question was about the trait of violence.

My was question about adaptation, so let me break this down in simple terms here, an analogy if you will. Say for instance I was to live in some place like Korea for like ten years would I pick up the language or not? I would think so, meaning I would have to adapt to survive. I love how your side stepping this. Science is not as ridged as you think mike.

 

[Mikemikev]

My was question about adaptation, so let me break this down in simple terms here, an analogy if you will. Say for instance I was to live in some place like Korea for like ten years would I pick up the language or not? I would think so, meaning I would have to adapt to survive. I love how your side stepping this. Science is not as ridged as you think mike.

You should try reading my whole post, especially the highlighted part.

"Adaptation" isn't the term you're looking for. It's environmental modification or simply non-genetic. Your question was about the trait of violence. You didn't show it's 100% non-genetic across cultures. I don't have time to answer your endless questions. Go to college or read some books or something. Try Sesardic, Rushton, Jensen, Gottfredson, Harpending, Dawkins, etc.

And yes, obviously, type of language spoken is non-genetic.

 

[unclestryker]

And yes,

Then it is possible that behavior (something you call genetic) can be modified. Do you even Pavlov?
https://www.simplypsychology.org/pavlov.html

 

[Mikemikev]

Then it is possible that behavior (something you call genetic) can be modified. Do you even Pavlov?
https://www.simplypsychology.org/pavlov.html

Where did say "behavior is genetic"? You are resorting to lying now?

 

[unclestryker]

It's environmental modification or simply non-genetic.

Where did say "behavior is genetic"?

Right there.

The taxonomies are then further informative in increasing order for a range of biological and behavioral traits,

and when people are talking about traits it usually implied that it is genetic.

 

[StoneKnightMan]

@Mikemikev . Do you ever take s break from the farms? Don't you have better things to do instead of arguing with us here?

 

[Mikemikev]

View attachment 224647

You're quote mining. How pathetic. I was referring to culturally modified behaviors being at least partially non-genetic when you were calling that "adaptation". I never said "behavior is genetic" and repeatedly qualified that behavioral traits vary in genetic and environmental components from trait to trait. I'm not sure whether you're actually this ignorant, or playing ignorant to provoke me. Either way you can sod off.

Right there.


and when people are talking about traits it usually implied that it is genetic.

Informative meaning allowing probabilistic prediction for a range of traits not necessarily meaning all traits. Bro do you even English comprehension?

 

[unclestryker]

quote mining

Yeah quote mining a dictionary. I am not who is throwing around terms in an effort to make you look smarter then you actually are.

Informative meaning allowing probabilistic prediction for a range of traits not necessarily meaning all traits. Bro do you even English comprehension?

and it sounds like to me you have no idea what you talking about. You conflate biology with psychology. Two fields that have nothing to with each other.

 

[Mikemikev]

and it sounds like to me you have no idea what you talking about. You conflate biology with psychology. Two fields that have nothing to with each other.

*facepalm*

 

[unclestryker]

*facepalm*

Go right on ahead, all you proven to me was that you don't want a debate, you want to lecture.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Biological categories are in the first place descriptive of nature, from Linnaen morphological taxonomy to Darwinian genealogical taxonomy to Mayrian genomic taxonomy. The taxonomies are then further informative in increasing order for a range of biological and behavioral traits, such that establishing the category allows one to predict traits. I'm assuming you know the technical definition of informative. Why don't you apply for college biology? I can't answer your questions all day. Unless you want to pay me.

Are you that strapped for cash Mike that you have to beg for money just to be on a forum and talk? Just when I thought you couldn't get worse, I wake up and here it is. How pathetic.

 

[Mikemikev]

Go right on ahead, all you proven to me was that you don't want a debate, you want to lecture.

No I don't want to debate you. You don't know anything. It's like debating calculus with a child who can't multiply. Go read what I recommended.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

No I don't want to debate you. You don't know anything. It's like debating calculus with a child who can't multiply. Go read what I recommended.

The reason why you don't want to debate anyone Mike is because you know you'd lose as already seen in the thread.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

No I don't want to debate you.