Miriam Yaniv vs Strata (again) June 2021 - Sequel to the 2019 lolsuit. Written by Jonathan.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
He’s claiming Miriam is “an owner” of the common areas of the property. Does Canadian body corporate law work that way? It is very strange if it does. Strata usually means you own your own individual piece and have a right of use of the common parts, subject to the rules set by the committee.

Also I notice he’s now “Jessica S Simpson”. What a twit.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, Short Stack and Allakazam223
theshep said:
Yet again he's plagiarised chunks of someone else's work.
Click to expand...
I doubt this will surprise anyone. You've only got to listen to him trying to string a sentence together and his efforts of putting pen to paper to realise he's stolen, yet again, someone's body of work.

Not crediting the original author is disgusting but again not surprising coming from yaniv...what's hours and hours of someone else's work matter when there's $30,000+ to be had?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patricia Highsmith, Short Stack, artilleryfroth and 1 other person
pr3nt177 said:
I doubt this will surprise anyone. You've only got to listen to him trying to string a sentence together and his efforts of putting pen to paper to realise he's stolen, yet again, someone's body of work.

Not crediting the original author is disgusting but again not surprising coming from yaniv...what's hours and hours of someone else's work matter when there's $30,000+ to be had?
Click to expand...
Why would the Strata pay him? The worst they would need do is cure the deficiancy. So put up a few strobe smoke heads. Johnny isn't owed a dime from this.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Allakazam223 and Short Stack
"BUT...BUT ...BUT....they could have died from it & I got PTSD at the thought of my mommy being a crispy critter.. I'll have to live with that image for the rest of my pathetic life"
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Thumb Butler
RodgerDodger said:
Why would the Strata pay him? The worst they would need do is cure the deficiancy. So put up a few strobe smoke heads. Johnny isn't owed a dime from this.
Click to expand...
All that anxiety and fear of being toasted for 3.5 years...someone's sure got to pay for that and it sure ain't going to be the yanivs.

This is the 4th (afaik) claim these feckers have filed between them and the chances are there'll be more. Naive to think that if their demands are met, even if it is to just to shut them up, they won't find something else to complain/file about. It's just going to go and on and on.

The old hags knew what the flats were all about when they viewed, got a mortgage(s) and moved in. Yet here we are with cross country trips (petrol/car hire/flights/eating expenses, gifts for the catfish and her "child", talk of an expensive engagement ring and honeymoon), weekends away, hotel visits, and hairdos willy-nilly yet couldn't find a few hundred $$$ to ensure staying safe and worry-free.

edit to avoid double posting
1623265295869.png

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Allakazam223, The Un-Clit and 2 others
pr3nt177 said:
All that anxiety and fear of being toasted for 3.5 years...someone's sure got to pay for that and it sure ain't going to be the yanivs.

This is the 4th (afaik) claim these feckers have filed between them and the chances are there'll be more. Naive to think that if their demands are met, even if it is to just to shut them up, they won't find something else to complain/file about. It's just going to go and on and on.

The old hags knew what the flats were all about when they viewed, got a mortgage(s) and moved in. Yet here we are with cross country trips (petrol/car hire/flights/eating expenses, gifts for the catfish and her "child", talk of an expensive engagement ring and honeymoon), weekends away, hotel visits, and hairdos willy-nilly yet couldn't find a few hundred $$$ to ensure staying safe and worry-free.

edit to avoid double posting
View attachment 2247197
Click to expand...
Do you honestly think the Strata's managers and lawyers are not aware, letter and verse, of what their obligations are under whatever the Canuckistani equivalent to the Americans With Disabilities act are? And precisely what the line is between their obligations and the tennant homeowners falls?

@LangleyResident can probably tell us when the buildings were built. If they were built after the late 80's the common area fire alarm system likely already has visual cues. Because they all do. Older systems would be grandfathered in, which means Yaniv has no case. If he's bitching about the units inside Miriam's condo, those are on her to arrange for and pay for. That's part of home ownership.

And to get an idea of the difference, a regular off the shelf First Alert Smoke Alarm costs between $19-49 usd off the shelf at Home Depot. The strobing units for the Hearing Impaired run $350 apiece. (I just installed 3 in my mothers unit last weekend).

John could have called the Fire Department. They often offer them at a discount rate and will install them free for elderly homeowners... provided they aren't being both sued and sexualky harrassed by the lunatics making the request.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: kazuhiro, Ralphamale, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob and 12 others
RodgerDodger said:
Do you honestly think the Strata's managers and lawyers are not aware, letter and verse, of what their obligations are under whatever the Canuckistani equivalent to the Americans With Disabilities act are? And precisely what the line is between their obligations and the tennant homeowners falls?

@LangleyResident can probably tell us when the buildings were built. If they were built after the late 80's the common area fire alarm system likely already has visual cues. Because they all do. Older systems would be grandfathered in, which means Yaniv has no case. If he's bitching about the units inside Miriam's condo, those are on her to arrange for and pay for. That's part of home ownership.

And to get an idea of the difference, a regular off the shelf First Alert Smoke Alarm costs between $19-49 usd off the shelf at Home Depot. The strobing units for the Hearing Impaired run $350 apiece. (I just installed 3 in my mothers unit last weekend).

John could have called the Fire Department. They often offer them at a discount rate and will install them free for elderly homeowners... provided they aren't being both sued and sexualky harrassed by the lunatics making the request.
Click to expand...
Of course they know, a pretty poor show if they don't and nobody has claimed otherwise. afaik the buildings were built 2007-2009 approx so I'd imagine they're modern equipped and fall well within fire and general safety regulations.

According to their filing, the Fire Department & Fire Inspectors were approached but yaniv being yaniv didn't elaborate...strikes me that if the FB had any concerns with the present set-up then yaniv would have splattered the entire claim with details. afaik here in the UK if buildings aren't up to current fire regs standard then hefty fines are handed out at least. So it seems the only ones unhappy with the current set-up are the yanivs themselves. Quelle surprise.
1623275524868.png


The only personal effort they've put into solving the problem is yaniv pricing up...
1623275352846.png

1623276493924.png

They can't in all seriousness claim they haven't had the cash, Twitter etc prove otherwise in the last 12 months alone.

Only $30000 will solve their problems and they think that because they are paying a mortgage that that's where taking any personal responsibility / home ownership ends, every whim to be met by others. They simply want the £30000.00+. They'll keep trying to extort money...two failed cases haven't put them off, I doubt this one will either, unless someone has the gonads to go after full costs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, ConSluttant, Allakazam223 and 1 other person
Oh boy lots of delicious stupidity in that filing. And most telling is he proves the Strata's case for them. Aside from presenting none of the communications with the Strata, at the end he states that the Strata informed him that it is the unit owners responsibility to make any such modifications to their property. A maintenance dispute with your Strata is neither a Human Rights Violation nor a $35,000 matter.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, ConSluttant, ProtonMailMan and 3 others
Annie Adderall said:
I'm excited for the day when Yaniv sues a powerful entity that isn't afraid to punch down. It's bound to happen eventually.
Click to expand...
Oh please god let him go after Walmart. Walmart are astonishingly vicious when sued and love to drive up your legal costs as much as possible and are notorious for imposing pyrrhic victories on their foes even when they win. They famously closed a brand new store they'd just finished building (up in Canada I think) prior to opening it because the employees tried to unionize, sued Walmart when they tried to union-bust and eventually won. The workers got their "win" -- complete with a shiny "but thou must" order from the court -- but the store never opened and nobody got their cushy union jobs, plus it cost them and the union an arm and a leg to litigate. And years of their time, of course.

It must have cost Walmart tens of millions of dollars in losses from selling off the brand new building and the property under it, and even more in lost profits the store might have generated. But they did it anyway, because they viewed that outcome as the better option compared to allowing a union to force its way into one of their stores or worse -- giving other Walmart workers inspiration to unionize. They just made sure the union's victory was as expensive and hollow as possible.

Please, Yaniv, go fake a slip-and-fall at Walmart and sue them for not compensating you in diapers and tampons. That would make my whole year.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: kazuhiro, Patricia Highsmith, Windex and 18 others
moocow said:
Oh please god let him go after Walmart. Walmart is astonishingly vicious when sued and love to drive up your legal costs as much as possible and are notorious for imposing pyrrhic victories on their foes even when they win. They famously closed a brand new store they'd just finished building (up in Canada I think) prior to opening it because the employees tried to unionize, sued Walmart when it tried to union-bust and eventually won. The workers got their "win" -- complete with a shiny "but thou must" order from the court -- but the store never opened and nobody got their cushy union jobs, plus it cost them and the union an arm and a leg to litigate. And years of their time, of course.
Click to expand...

They built a new store a mile from their old store in Clovis, Ca because the old store formed a union.

Back to Tranniv, it's so fascinating to see someone so revealing of their flaws.

Other than the inviolable law of The Farms--thou shalt not pozload my negholep--what's to keep someone from rambling into his building, popping the fire alarm, and rambling back out?

Assuming actual facts matter in the legal hellscape of leafland?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, moocow, Allakazam223 and 1 other person
pr3nt177 said:
Of course they know, a pretty poor show if they don't and nobody has claimed otherwise. afaik the buildings were built 2007-2009 approx so I'd imagine they're modern equipped and fall well within fire and general safety regulations.

According to their filing, the Fire Department & Fire Inspectors were approached but yaniv being yaniv didn't elaborate...strikes me that if the FB had any concerns with the present set-up then yaniv would have splattered the entire claim with details. afaik here in the UK if buildings aren't up to current fire regs standard then hefty fines are handed out at least. So it seems the only ones unhappy with the current set-up are the yanivs themselves. Quelle surprise.
View attachment 2247707

The only personal effort they've put into solving the problem is yaniv pricing up...
View attachment 2247701
View attachment 2247785
They can't in all seriousness claim they haven't had the cash, Twitter etc prove otherwise in the last 12 months alone.

Only $30000 will solve their problems and they think that because they are paying a mortgage that that's where taking any personal responsibility / home ownership ends, every whim to be met by others. They simply want the £30000.00+. They'll keep trying to extort money...two failed cases haven't put them off, I doubt this one will either, unless someone has the gonads to go after ful
Click to expand...
I don't think anyone has been fined over Grenfell yet but I could be wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back