US Missing F-35 fighter jet disappears over South Carolina after pilot ejects in 'mishap' - The pilot parachuted over South Carolina but their fighter jet still hasn't been found by authorities. (Find my Iphone feature not enabled)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Missing F-35 fighter jet disappears over South Carolina after pilot ejects in 'mishap'


The United States Marine Corps has launched a full investigation after an F-35 fighter jet has gone missing after a plot ejected over South Carolina.

The pilot was in a Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort F-35 when the incident occurred on Sunday, according to a spokesperson for the Marine Corps.

The pilot ejected over North Charleston, South Carolina at around 2pm. He was taken to a local hospital where he was in stable condition, said Major Melanie Salinas. The pilot’s name has not been released.

Based on the missing plane’s location and trajectory, the search for the F-35 Lightning II jet was focused on Lake Moultrie and Lake Marion, said Senior Master Sgt. Heather Stanton at Joint Base Charleston. Both lakes are north of North Charleston.

A South Carolina Law Enforcement Division helicopter joined the search for the F-35 after some bad weather cleared in the area, Stanton said. Military officials appealed in online posts Sunday for any help from the public in locating the aircraft.
f3501.PNG
F-35 planeThe F-35 is manufactured by Lockheed Martin (Image: Getty)

Given that the pilot was engaging in a "military exercise" at the time of the disappearance of the F-35 fighter jet, speculation continues to abound about what, exactly, the pilots were doing in the area. Officials are still investigating why the pilot ejected, authorities said.

The pilot of a second F-35 returned safely to Joint Base Charleston, Salinas said. The planes and pilots were with the Marine Fighter Attack Training Squadron 501 based in Beaufort, not far from South Carolina’s Atlantic coast.

Officials have asked for the public's assistance in finding the downed jet, something which local Congresswoman Nacy Mace blasted on social media.

Joint Base Charleston said in a tweet: "We’re working with MCASBeaufortSC to locate an F-35 that was involved in a mishap this afternoon. The pilot ejected safely. If you have any information that may help our recovery teams locate the F-35, please call the Base Defense Operations Center at 843-963-3600."

Nancy Mace responded: "How in the hell do you lose an F-35? How is there not a tracking device and we’re asking the public to what, find a jet and turn it in?"
f3502.PNG
F-35 JetThe F-35 jet was still missing late Sunday afternoon (Image: Getty)

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

Daily Express US has reached out to a representative for the United States Marine Corps for comment.

Officially known as the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, the missing fighter jet is part of a family of stealth multirole combat aircraft.

Considered one of the elite fighter jets, these stealth bombers are an essential tool of war for the American military.

Joint Base Charleston is a huge 20,000-acre base and shares space - including runways - with Charleston International.

Around 10,000 active service members live on the enormous base.

Follow our social media accounts here on facebook.com/ExpressUSNews and @expressusnews

(+)
Source : https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1813898/breaking-marine-pilot-ejects-f35-charleston
 
How in the hell do you lose an F-35? How is there not a tracking device and we’re asking the public to what, find a jet and turn it in
A transponder signal even if encrypted would diminish stealth capabilities I imagine
 
It must have flown out over the ocean after the pilot ejected. As well if it was 10,000 feet it was probably below radar coverage, and if it went out over the water the transponder probably couldn't ping the SSR. It would explain why they can't find a smoldering wreck that aircraft tend to leave behind.
Why would they ask for the publics help locating it if it headed out to sea?
 
It must have flown out over the ocean after the pilot ejected. As well if it was 10,000 feet it was probably below radar coverage, and if it went out over the water the transponder probably couldn't ping the SSR. It would explain why they can't find a smoldering wreck that aircraft tend to leave behind.
Right towards the waiting Chinese salvage ship.

Oh. The transponder was turned off. Literally, I read that on ZeroHedge. And if you could find it on radar, it would be a waste of fucking time and money, wouldn’t it?
 
And if you could find it on radar, it would be a waste of fucking time and money, wouldn’t it?
Radar can detect "low observable" craft, it just filters it as "noise".
It's very easy to tell a plane from a bird or golf ball if the object is moving at the speed of a fighter jet.
Russians are intercepting Storm Shadow "stealth" missiles with this "revolutionary" logic

Welcome to the incompetence of the US military.
We're going to lose a major war, probably Ukraine.
 
Radar can detect "low observable" craft, it just filters it as "noise".
It's very easy to tell a plane from a bird or golf ball if the object is moving at the speed of a fighter jet.
Russians are intercepting Storm Shadow "stealth" missiles with this "revolutionary" logic

Welcome to the incompetence of the US military.
We're going to lose a major war, probably Ukraine.
You can probably intercept a relatively slow cruise missile from the heat signature.

To pick up stealth with radar, you need to use low frequency ranges. Low frequency ranges travel too slowly to make a “lock,” and they aren’t often used.

The f-35 radar cross section IS like a golf ball, but radar system will also struggle depending on how low it is flying, and after a few hundred miles, the curvature of the earth will break line of sight
 
This doesn't make sense. Why would the any Military admit to such incompetent boobery, then plaster "pls halp" messages all over social media for a newly released, still top-secret, high-valued, cutting-edge weapons platform?

This is either some form of honeypot to catch a local mole or weapons/equipment test for a new piece of surveillance tech.

Edit: The I.F.F. Transponder is fit to every aircraft as a 'you must have this' safety feature. they have their own frequencies which can be hidden from civvy air towers and other aircraft but generally turning it off while doing a sortie over your own nation is a big no-no.
The black box has it's own locating beacon, as well as an underwater version which pings when it touches water. Those things are designed to be nigh-on indestructible, using technology proven decades ago.

None of it ads up for normal flying other than multiple failures by the operator which would border on malicious intent. And no, shaniqua and daneeka aren't the ones piloting the very best of the best equipment that the airforce has to offer, regardless what some fluffy promotional material says.
 
Last edited:
This doesn't make sense. Why would the any Military admit to such incompetent boobery, then plaster "pls halp" messages all over social media a newly released, still top-secret, high-valued, cutting-edge weapons platform?

This is either some form of honeypot to catch a local mole or weapons/equipment test for a new piece of surveillance tech.
That would be cool, but insanely optimistic. Just a couple of years back, another f-35 missed the flight deck while trying to land on a carrier, and we had to race China to get a salvage ship to retrieve the wreck before them.

I really, really want to know why the pilot set the autopilot and had the transponder off before he ejected.
 
To pick up stealth with radar, you need to use low frequency ranges. Low frequency ranges travel too slowly to make a “lock,” and they aren’t often used.
Look, I know absolutely dick about stealth aircraft, but I know that that is just incorrect. Frequency, low or high, doesn't make light move slower.

What is almost certainly the issue is that low frequency radar waves dissipate too quickly to have much usable range.
 
Back