Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
AltisticRight said:
From this image, I found the device they are likely using.
View attachment 6102141

Then using FDA's website:
View attachment 6102178
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/K201228.pdf
I also found the device the one above superseded.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/k111925.pdf

Here is their cocaine test, an EIA test.
View attachment 6102180

The cutoff for their devices are indeed 5ng/10ml or 500pg/ml.
View attachment 6102203

Tables. ng/10mg of hair.
View attachment 6102209
Or pg/mg (1 milligram) of hair.
View attachment 6102210

So if Minnesota Monitoring Inc. was using one of Psychemedics' devices, the default reading appears to be ng/10mg or pg/mg. This does make sense concerning the hair required.
Click to expand...
So if the girl tested positive for cocaine, with a reading of 5000 and the machine can read a minimum of 500, she had 10 times the minimum amount in her system?

That sounds like a lot. Is 5000 pictogram/milliliters something that can be converted to a layman's unit of understanding?
 
  • DRINK!
  • Like
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and InspectorJappOfficial
Fascist Kirk said:
Rackets is going to collect super chats for hours and never do a copes show...... people are pay pigging to shit post ......
Click to expand...
Rekieta can use the superchat paypig money he makes tonight to buy a cow costume to wear in prison. All the convicts on the block will call him Juju. No one will want to know why.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: I Love Huge Long Chode, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Cowboy Kim and 16 others
Nick just stated that "sensitive documents were released about my family" after he announced tonight's stream.

Nick stated that the documents were supposed to be protected and he's going to have an attorney inquire into what happened. So if this was publicly available to anyone, court staff fucked up majorly. if it wasn't available publicly, someone in particular is going to get fucked for being an idiot
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: LemonKingLover, I Love Huge Long Chode, Snekpilled and 161 others
MaltVinegarRespecter said:
That's not how hair follicle tests work. They don't test for the drug they test for metabolites.
Click to expand...
They test for both, don't they? Both the parent drug and the metabolites because that distinguishes between exposure (which again, can lead to false positives for people in drug heavy environments and jobs) and ingestion. All we know is that Audrey tested positive for the parent drug. I mean, I double checked, tell me what I'm missing. I assumed that kids living in a drug den are going to be contaminated with drugs.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw...cked-drugtested-sergeant-20170309-guuj93.html
https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/defaul.../makela-literature-summary-dtab-june-2014.pdf
https://transparencyproject.org.uk/hair-strand-testing-pitfalls-and-limitations/
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03979
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr, Hongourable Madisha, koos koets and 4 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back