Balldo MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Next Highlight
MNPublicRecords said:
Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?
Click to expand...
WTH.png
WTH!!!! IS THIS TRUE!??!?!

If this is true, I hate Nick and Kayla so fucking much. They deserve the rope. I feel sick.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: AltisticRight, AIDShaver69, BBChannel and 364 others
MNPublicRecords said:
Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?
Click to expand...
She didn't just test positive, but way hot. 500mg was the cutoff on that hair follicle test. Audryrose's level was over 5000. She just turned 9 years old last week, BTW.

Janny edit: The correct unit is pg/mg, picograms per miligram.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: AIDShaver69, 820㎌Cap, LemonKingLover and 213 others
TurdThrower said:
Is that real? "tested positive for Cocaine at a level of over 5000 with a cutoff of 500." can anyone explain what that means besides the obvious?
Click to expand...


What it means is that the Rekietas aren't getting out from under the child abuse/endangerment charges. That kid, barely 9, tested positive for cocaine at 10x the cutoff level. 500pg/mg of hair is the cutoff level. Anything below that is considered a negative result for the purposes of the test. 500-2000pg indicates "low use" or "recreational use". 2000-10000pg indicates "medium use" or "daily/weekends". It's a hair follicle test so it's not like the kid just got into the coke stash one time and got messed up from playing around. Someone was dosing her with the stuff.
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: AIDShaver69, I hate children?, grimacefetishist and 302 others
MNPublicRecords said:
Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?
Click to expand...
Paging Robert Barnes about the constitutionality of your kids STEALING your coke.

feral cat #6385 said:
Hmmm.... Well Nick did mention "having to keep an eye on a family member." Maybe the kid got into something they shouldn't.

This looks real bad. Caution is advised.
Click to expand...
This dumb motherfucker is going to take all his balldo-washers down in one amazing move.
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Quarterback Rex Grossman, Aspiring Artist, Cpl. Long Dong Silver and 77 others
Mrsneksnekson said:
Is he even trying to hide the comparisons at this point?

View attachment 6101287View attachment 6101289
Click to expand...
That digital art of his face is laughably bad. Did he draw it himself?
MNPublicRecords said:
Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?
Click to expand...
Interesting development right before his first real stream back. Should pair really well with his complete denial of endangering his kids.

Edit: @The I Scream Man I would assume if it was residue all the kids would have tested positive. Poor kid probably thought it was candy
 
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Hellion, Aspiring Artist, ThotsForTism and 35 others
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Guston, I Love Huge Long Chode, Aspiring Artist and 59 others
If this is real, then good fucking job Nick. You're actively the reason why your children will be trapped in the Foster Care system.

1718760546156.png

chrome_sC5h0Wlyo7.png

Also I want to thank Ms. Sweep :story: for her hard work going through the home to help make this determination. Cope and seethe Nick, your house is a wreck.

chrome_7jUAdJC34X.png

chrome_w0OI98ln0Y.png
 
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Shush, Guston, I Love Huge Long Chode and 184 others
We now know whose coke it was. Nick is completely vindicated. That damn Kid needs to be locked up for 25 years. What a monster. That nine year old was sneaking out and buying 25g bags of cocaine for personal use and hiding it in Nick's safe.

I hope we hear from EVS and Barnes on this situation soon.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: AN/ALR56, pottedwigsquideo, BBChannel and 460 others
Lorne Armstrong said:

What it means is that the Rekietas aren't getting out from under the child abuse/endangerment charges.
Click to expand...
Wait am I reading this right? this is saying the 9-year-old's hair tested positive for cocaine at levels consistent with regular/daily use? and the other kids didn't?
How does that factor in with the assumption that she wasn't personally using (ie is it easy enough to just kinda pick up that material from living in the house with it, or does this indicate that she got into the coke pile?)
Father of the year, rackets. keep it up. proud of you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: I Love Huge Long Chode, beets4borshenko, Aspiring Artist and 78 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back