Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Also Not a Fake Name said:
Due to actions by my ex wife, CPS wanted to talk to my daughter, the long story short is my ex wife’s boyfriend sexually abused by daughter and my ex wife tried to cover it up.
Click to expand...
I am going to say, you had to have real calm patience in this situation because sincerely o think as soon as I leaned about this both her and the boyfriend would end up with bullet holes in their heads
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Vetinari, Vecr, Richard Cheese and 4 others
Null said:
It's not happening. The result is not false. The only way it can be false is if they mixed samples.
Click to expand...
So no chance shebtouched the scale and picked her nose afterwards? She was 100% intentionally exposed to coke?

Every kid deserves a parent but not every parent deserves a kid. I hope Nick and Kayla get slapped with a brick.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Cpl. Long Dong Silver, suspended animation, Coo Coo Bird and 5 others
Just got caught up on this shitshow... Why the fuck was any of this necessary? The hole this man dug for himself, and his uncaring attitude about it all, the shallow pointless ego. What can he prove anymore?

Even on the off chance this all ends up being fake by some kind of dark magic, it's still all so absurd, just the situation he already created for himself, has been curating for years now.
That he is completely neglecting his family, ruining it even, his children cast to the side before he even ensured they can properly stand on their own feet and not be directly affected by his selfish self-immolation.
Chasing some bullshit transient high until his body further deteriorates from all of this degeneracy...
Can't he just stop, look around, realize it's really bad enough already?

But of course not. It will probably just get worse.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: PhoBingas, Coo Coo Bird, Vecr and 5 others
Null said:
Is it possible it could have stayed since January? Does any cocaine test go back that far?
Click to expand...
I used to run a workplace drug testing program, so I'm actually in a good position to answer this question... Typically, the sample collector will take about an inch and a half of head hair from closest to the scalp, which will give you more or less a three month record of prior drug use. The longer the segment of hair that gets tested, the farther back the test can detect usage.

I had a few cases of people who had shaved their head, in which case we would collect body hair for the sample, which can provide a record of up to a year depending on the person and how fast their body hair grows. Now in the case of a CPS investigation, they'll test the entire segment of hair that's collected from a kid regardless of length, so they can have as complete a picture as possible of drug exposure.

I have a friend whose ex-wife let their three year old get into her meth stash, and they tested the entire sample they collected from him (which tragically turned up extremely positive, but got my friend full custody of his son because of that fact). So to answer your question, yes, a hair test will go back quite some time if the hair sample is long enough. Every inch and a half is three months, so all you need is a six inch sample to get a year long record of drug exposure.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Hellion, BBChannel, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob and 144 others
Agamemnon Busmalis said:
You'd have to do it pretty close in proximity to the drug test though. If he shaved it for the first time a couple days before I would buy that argument for sure, it's just like somebody smuggling in clean urine for a test. Clear intent to evade the test.
Click to expand...
This is why if you plan to do this for the purposes of avoiding tests, you start with that short haircut. A sudden change in patterns of behavior to evade an upcoming drug test is inherently suspicious. (And less than useless if you already have a positive one and then cut your hair and then get your second test.)
Agamemnon Busmalis said:
I don't know if they're going to pretrial drug test him unless it's by the defense to help build his case. They have substantial evidence of the crimes he was charged with independent of any drug test results and I don't think any of them depend on actually using the substance itself.
Click to expand...
It would be a good idea, that is, if the dumb fuck would actually stop taking drugs and come to court with a bunch of negative results. At the very least, it would earn him Good Boy Points at sentencing.

With the kid testing positive, though, there may not be a remotely good deal on the table because they've got him dead to rights.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Maraschino, rubytintedchix, often puzzled and 11 others
moocow said:
Doesn't he realize how fucking guilty that makes him look in the court of public opinion? He can claim that doesn't matter to him, but losing his audience would be a major narcissistic injury for him and that's a likely outcome if all his procedural wrangling fails (which it probably will) and everything comes out anyway.
Click to expand...
You have to understand two things about Nick:
  1. He is a RAGING narcissist, as several people have outlined in his main thread. Even if he understood the consequences of his words, it doesn't matter - he will NOT ever admit wrongdoing, for doing so would imply that he is not the platonic ideal of perfection.
  2. The repeated alcohol and coke benders have most likely fried his brain and dulled any sense of critical thinking he might have once had.
The thing is, on some level, deep down, he does know how fucked he is - but his brain cannot accept that. So here he is, the angel dust snorting lawyer, earning his gold medal in the Mental Gymnastics Championship 2024. Look upon his works, ye Kiwis, and despair.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: koos koets, Pedophobe, Maraschino and 15 others
Null said:
The metabolites are determined by nanogram per milligram of human hair sample. They do specific lengths instead of whole hair strands because the more hair, the smaller the ng/mg sample is, and there are cutoffs. If you take too much, you will get a false negative. There's nothing you can do to get a false positive. Only by ingesting cocaine does your hair get the metabolites.
Click to expand...
Well, there is still the chance that one of the adults tried to switch his hair with the daughter's - did all four adults test positive for cocaine?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Vecr and Procrastinhater
Doctor Love said:
Well, there is still the chance that one of the adults tried to switch his hair with the daughter's - did all four adults test positive for cocaine?
Click to expand...
At least Kayla and Nick refused to be tested.
GenociderSyo said:
You can be held in contempt if you cut your hair while under a judges order not to.
Click to expand...
He isn't. He paid $5K for the privilege of not having to be drug tested, since he intends to keep doing drugs.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: TexOffender, BOLDYSPICY!, Vecr and 4 others
The low sensitivity implies it has a decent number of false positives, but there's never a false negative. I highly doubt there are any false positives with readings at these levels though.

100% specificity is really pretty incredible.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr and Procrastinhater
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back