Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I always interpreted "family emergency" as bullshit - hangovers or partying or just dudnt feel like it. Like "my (already dead, or thriving) grandmother died" excuses for blowing off work.

Most of the time it was, so it is a fair baseline to start from absent other evidence.

Yes I meant that.

No. The coke could have been ingested yesterday, or months ago, or all at once, or in daily microdoses, and then you'd have to factor in her metabolic rate and etc. etc. to the point that you might as well just be randomly picking a number.
That´s what I imagined and pushed back against the notion of the impossible dose. But if it was a single event, can you consider the coke evenly distributed and make the extrapolation?

So what I am taking from this exchange is that Nick saying 'If the levels were that high, then she would be DEAD!' is a red herring argument. She could have built up levels in here system over time or all at once, and no one (let alone a mong like Nose) could tell the difference.
 
Is the 9 year old fucked for life now after having that much cocaine in her system? I don't know anything about addiction and withdrawals, how long cravings last or any of that, but if Nick is an indicator of how it affects adults...

I dunno, man. Can the kid recover, or is this going to be something she struggles with forever now?
From what other people have said earlier in this thread: cocaine is not physically addictive and children have enough neural plasticity that she will recover to some degree with time. It's unclear if the kid had one big exposure to cocaine that led to Nick's several day absence and his tweet about "when you're a dad" or if the retards thought it would be funny and weird to give the kid cocaine regularly. Naturally it would be better for the kid neurologically if she had never been exposed to cocaine at all, but I think that if her exposure was from one mega-dose it'd be better for her prognosis than if she had been getting dosed by her dumbass parents regularly.

In conclusion: It's very much a suboptimal situation for the development of a child but I don't think her brain meats are turbofucked by the exposure, especially if it was the alleged single incident. The much harder thing for her and the other kids going forward will be the consequences of her parents being such massive fuckups
 
It depends. If it was the one megadose she didn't have time to get addicted. If Nick was dosing her over time? She definitely could be addicted and will have her dopamine receptors fucked up before puberty.
Cocaine addiction isn't a physical dependence like opiates either you get addicted because you really like it and don't want to stop doing it or because you're coping or depressed or whatever, or you just don't get addicted and stop doing it whenever you feel like. She'll be fine.
So what I am taking from this exchange is that Nick saying 'If the levels were that high, then she would be DEAD!' is a red herring argument. She could have built up levels in here system over time or all at once, and no one (let alone a mong like Nose) could tell the difference.
Yeah I have no idea what he's saying there because the levels aren't even very high.
 
1. The amount that was found (5000 pg/mg) corresponds to the bottom 10% of adult cocaine users. So it's significant but not stratospheric (for an adult).
That part is what intrigues because there seems to be a notion around the thread that this amount of cocaine is stratospheric, that´s why I´m insisting if there is a way to extrapolate the amount of cocaine consumed in a single dose, let´s say yesterday if the coke is distributed evenly per her body:

5000pg/mg, given an average of 30kg for a female girl at 9, so it would be
(5*10-9) (10^6^) (30)=0,15g or 150mg coke
pg to g mg/kg kg

Is this math even close to real?
 
That part is what intrigues because there seems to be a notion around the thread that this amount of cocaine is stratospheric, that´s why I´m insisting if there is a way to extrapolate the amount of cocaine consumed in a single dose, let´s say yesterday if the coke is distributed evenly per her body:

5000pg/mg, given an average of 30kg for a female girl at 9, so it would be
(5*10-9) (10^6^) (30)=0,15g or 150mg coke
pg to g mg/kg kg

Is this math even close to real?
Something that a lot of people have missed is that these tests measure metabolites (of the byproducts produced by the liver or whatever metabolizes cocaine), which are probably documented somewhere on how much metabolite would be created per mg ingested of relatively pure cocaine; but I'm not going to be bothered to look it up and there are other factors as well such as the difference between the metabolism of a fully grown adult vs a small child.
 
I used LC/MS/MS in a lab for a while and we were governed pretty strict with EPA GLP (good laboratory practices) regulations. There are similar rules from the FDA as well and by not abiding by them you can get financially fined and criminally charged. These labs are not some fly-by-night setup and the machines cost hundreds of thousands to buy and maintain.
I'm presuming a professional laboratory running these tests would be governed by the same rules and regulations so their results can stand up to audit.

In my mind the allegations of blatant fraud by Barnes would have to have some really good and specific evidence to support. If they're testing the wrong metabolite like Nick claimed then there could be 100s of court cases and sentences that would be affected and would be grounds for appeal.

Another thing, it is interesting that you can have some metabolites created in the hair just from contact exposure. There is the possibility of exposure from that AND Nick using it medicinally on the child. I'm not sure how that could throw metabolite ratios off.
 
Is the 9 year old fucked for life now after having that much cocaine in her system? I don't know anything about addiction and withdrawals, how long cravings last or any of that, but if Nick is an indicator of how it affects adults...

I dunno, man. Can the kid recover, or is this going to be something she struggles with forever now?
Every child in Nick's life is permanently fucked up due to his disgusting, degraded activities.

He has deprived every child in his life of a remotely sane upbringing. Instead, every single one of his children have been exposed to police batering rams knocking down their front door, getting dragged out of their home by cops, and being placed in foster care.

Thanks to a fucking piece of shit. This specific piece of shit:
nickgump.png
He's fitin da gooberment for the rights of Gumps everywhere.
 
Cocaine addiction isn't a physical dependence like opiates either you get addicted because you really like it and don't want to stop doing it or because you're coping or depressed or whatever, or you just don't get addicted and stop doing it whenever you feel like. She'll be fine.
So she's only as messed up as the rest of those kids finding out that their parents love drugs more than them.
Every child in Nick's life is permanently fucked up due to his disgusting, degraded activities.

He has deprived every child in his life of a remotely sane upbringing. Instead, every single one of his children have been exposed to police batering rams knocking down their front door, getting dragged out of their home by cops, and being placed in foster care.

Thanks to a fucking piece of shit. This specific piece of shit:
View attachment 6114880
He's fitin da gooberment for the rights of Gumps everywhere.
Even worse, they're with grampa Rackets who is definitely balldoguarding.
 
As if those tests are accurate, it's probably high level but results are skewed due to children's fast metabolism of substances (including illicit and prescription ones),

Combine that with fact that hair follicies show drug's traces up to few months ago, always making weed junkies buttmad over not getting walmart job.

Cocaine is SNDRI, so its pretty much average amerifat kid experience in elementary school, aka SSRI + adhd meds to make sperg sit still in class :lit:
Assuming nothing wrong with heart, kid will live.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back