- Joined
- Jan 29, 2023
no kiddingThis means that in the 21st century, daily exposure to autists and retards is normal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no kiddingThis means that in the 21st century, daily exposure to autists and retards is normal
Have a look at them:no kidding
the grass outside is filled with poo and discarded fentanyl needles from all of the heckin' wholesome illegals invading the countryNigger, all these problems are easily resolved by going outside and touching grass
We gonna act like 90% of humans that have ever lived were all fufilled? Most people never became explorers/leaders/thinkers etc. They were just people with a way of living, hoping the next day will be the same as their today. Most humans were peasants and there isn't anything wrong with that. It's just the way it is.
The best and worst of humanity is displayed by a few, the rest are just there to witness.
So do something or stop complaining about how not everyone is special.
I agree with what your saying, but its just that majority of people have always been unremarkable, their brain mush. They do only as they are told and like thing they are told to like.I was alive in the 90s because I am old. I genuinely enjoyed that decade. It was just tech forward enough to not feel creepy (60s and 70s have a WEIRD Beatles transitional-state vibe), but not yet advanced enough to be globalized troon aspie dogshit.
No cope I think it might genuinely be the highlight of human history. If you go TOO far back it's like weird religious people sacrificing you or extreme poverty or shit medicinal progress and no aircon etc.
90s is the pinnacle of human tech before it turned into Frankenstein's monster. 2005 sort of era was good too, you were still pretty segregated, with maybe MSN. It's VERY abnormal for your daily social circle to be like, 4 billion people (however many non-oonga boongas exist right now).
This. Most of your simple common folk were, well...simple. Things may have been very difficult but they and their families really just worried about getting by, and they did what they had too. Even at the turn of the 20th century with the telegraph and the beginnings of radio and the telephone, the world was still pretty slow.There is a different topic talking about the industrial revolution and its consequences, however the vast majority of humans in all pf history only had their needs met and that was it. I dont expect people to read or write if they don't need to the same way peasants didn't learn to do things outside of what was needed for survival.
Yes. This is said better than the way i tried to put it.This. Most of your simple common folk were, well...simple. Things may have been very difficult but they and their families really just worried about getting by, and they did what they had too. Even at the turn of the 20th century with the telegraph and the beginnings of radio and the telephone, the world was still pretty slow.
And for sure, your average normies werent discussing Voltaire or Thoreau as they tilled the field or clocked out after a 12 hour shift at the fatal injury factory.
They did watch TV all day, the people aren't different the tech is. In the year 3000 humans might literally never move at ALL. We might all live in a Matrix like "perfect reality", and people will only ever "go to the surface" if there's a problem with our feeding tubes or medication tubes, or whatever else.Yes. This is said better than the way i tried to put it.
Majority of humankind has just sat around till they died, and thats honestly okay. You tend to only accomplish great/terrible things when you risk your neck, which is antithetical to survival which is why most people just do enough for their needs and thats it. Most boomers who complain about kids being on their phones all day did nothing but watch tv all day. I just see it as being human rather than some kind of defect with a generation.
I would argue that there was one big difference, a larger chunk of the population had more freedom, than what exists today. The state did not have the wealth or the technology to control & dictate what happened outside the castle walls. So even if the nobelmen were banging peasants on their wedding night, the vast majority of the populace were outside that control and even if they were within the realm, the nobelmen would have no way to know the peasant hotties were about to get hitched if they decided to keep it a secret. Today even third world countries can outsource their surveillance to corporations and target oppression on those pushing the limits, in turn, that encourages niggercattle to color inside the linesI agree with what your saying, but its just that majority of people have always been unremarkable, their brain mush. They do only as they are told and like thing they are told to like.
Uncle Ted said:The argument that “people now have more freedom than ever” is based on the fact that we are allowed to do almost anything we please as long as it has no practical consequences. See ISAIF, §72. Where our actions have practical consequences that may be of concern to the system (and few important practical consequences are not of concern to the system), our behavior, generally speaking, is closely regulated. Examples: We can believe in any religion we like, have sex with any consenting adult partner, take a plane to China or Timbuktu, have the shape of our nose changed, choose any from a huge variety of books, movies, musical recordings, etc., etc., etc. But these choices normally have no important practical consequences. Moreover, they do not require any serious effort on our part. We don’t change the shape of our own nose, we pay a surgeon to do it for us. We don’t go to China or Timbuktu under our own power, we pay someone to fly us there. On the other hand, within our own home city we can’t go from point A to point B without our movement being controlled by traffic regulations, we can’t buy a firearm without undergoing a background check, we can’t change jobs without having our background scrutinized by prospective employers, most people’s jobs require them to work according to rules, procedures, and schedules prescribed by their employers, we can’t start a business without getting licenses and permits, observing numerous regulations, and so forth.
Do you think Gen Z can build a bridge that will last until even 2100? I've seen no evidence of any form of talent in them. They're conditioned to only consoom, not to produce... The powers that be dictate what we should consoom rather than talented individuals.Hey man. Unplug. Just don't participate. Don't consume IP, don't use social media. You don't need anything from anyone -- you've got all you need.
We do not *need* to be constantly entertained or consuming media. Indulge your own creative outlets. Go back to basics. Once you're there, you will find interests you have previously overlooked.
Clean your apartment, cook yourself a meal. Let shit outside burn itself down, it doesn't matter.
I'm like 4 beers in and feeling feels, so I'll add this. I can read a book, listen to a song, or drive over a bridge that was made 100,200 years ago, and it hits strong and clear, or in the case of the bridge, is still standing today. If you can create or contribute to one thing like that, you have done good.
You forget slavery, penal colonies, indentured servitude, debtor's prisons surfdom, etc.a larger chunk of the population had more freedom, than what exists today. The state did not have the wealth or the technology to control & dictate what happened outside the castle walls
The best place for women in pre-modern Europe was Sparta. Nobody else came close.I personally enjoy not dying in childbirth at age 16 or being shoved in asylum and left to rot in early childhood.
Previous time periods were really only good for rich straight dudes, shit was godawful for everyone else.