I get the feeling that some of you just hate fun. The game is fun, horror of horrors.
>Several people consistently expressed how they're having fun with this game, some even acknowledging the problems with this game regardless
>Several people consistently expressed how they've had fun/are having fun with previous games
>"Y-you guys just hate fun! Don't talk negatively about a game, just mindlessly play it and have fun!"
And if some people played it (which they have for some reason) and did not have fun (which some said)? What happens then? Is that just an impossibly?
Zip up the game's pants when your done yeah? There is barely truthful statement here, further reinforcing my idea that most Wilds defenders are mostly bad faith actors, because at least niggercattle know when the just take their own advice and "just enjoy the game" as Mongrel wants people to. "This game has its issues but I do like it even if the other games were better" is a statement that'll cause you people to implode.
Even in this thread, actually you see a lot, comparatively, of Rise dickriding
Lol no.
but it's no longer the shiny new title to hate on, so it's all forgiven and forgotten and it's actually not a bad game and you can finally say positive things about it.
>Complains that people aren't shitting on Rise (there were, myself included)
>Complains people are shitting on Wilds
>"I'm not a hypocrite, you are!"
It's a pattern I have seen for every MH generation, and as always it's full of "no true scotsmans/back in my days".
Son, that's
every fucking game that has multiple entries. What is going on big guy?
Sure, didn't ask your opinion though since I was talking about the general popular consensus around the conversation being hypocritical and not personal opinion. But that's fine, since you felt the need to insert yourself into the frothing retard catagory, you pop off king.
>Posts in a public thread
>Someone replies to public post in a public thread
>On a site featuring people from all walks of life and opinions
>"No one asked for your opinion"
Lol, lmao even. People have responded better to his opinions than yours funny enough, if anything most people here didn't ask or want your opinion if your first retarded posts on this thread is any indicator. Even then, why should anyone be asked to give an opinion in the first place, yours or his? If you want a place like that, go back to Reddit. They'll (most likely) ban people for upvoting the wrong opinions so you'll fit right in. God help this site if you became a janny.
I was talking about the general popular consensus around the conversation being hypocritical
Throwing shit to the wall and seeing what sticks, eh?
and not personal opinion.
Sir that's all you've posted.
But that's fine, since you felt the need to insert yourself into the frothing retard catagory
Speaking of hypocritical, this is the most frothing reply yet.
>"I'm not a frothing retard! You are!"
This is just sad. The funniest part is,
he agreed with you regarding World. But because he also said that Wilds was worse, an opinion he's apparently not allowed to voice according to you, you're getting pissy at him. What a strange creature you are.
A perfect example, really. since Worlds story was a fucking slog to get through with forced exploratory walk abouts and go to y zone, go to x zone's and pitifully short hunts to boot, ugly women, the zorah magdaros sections which were basically 15-20 minute unskippable cutscenes, the guiding lands progress walls encouraging you to go gather for hours on end, and plenty of cutscenes nobody gave a fuck about,
And yet you defending similar-if not worse-practices in Wild. Good lord man. Now before you reply with some non-response that would pretty much equate to "You're wrong, I'm right," have you tried this towards people who aren't apart of your hivemind? Leftists do it often, and considering your posts you sure argue like one:
Not going to call you a pussy for doing it
