Mortifyer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2022
Or could it simply be that Tarl doesn't want his private life (airing his dirty laundry) out in the public.
Imagine making some half lie defense speech to a random judge - For that to be everlasting in the public eye, and domain?
A speech where you had to compromise your spirit in order not to be found guilty, and basically be strategic and humble/pathetic, in order to get off. (it`s just very private, is it not?)
He would be ridiculed forever for it.
He might be too proud for that I am thinking. It could also be the piss test? Who knows?
What are the rules about posting his court hearings after he is sentenced and found guilty?
Will the warnings against doing it still stand?
Will it be allowed then?
To me personally, its bonkers that people from the internet can follow and attend a personal trial-case regarding domestic issues online, or in person. (amusing as it may be). We are not talking about a traffic fine here.
Its not legal where I from. Your name wouldn't even appear anywhere if you asked the lawyer beforehand to make a name-ban for you. People wouldn't even be able to look the case up, unless they had your social security number, and many more personal details. Implicated names of witnesses, or victims, circumstances, places, would still be obscured, even if having all these other personal details above. And it certainly wouldn't be streamed online!
It might be very humbling to have all sorts of strangers following something this personal to him?
Domestic situations are of very personal caliber.
Imagine making some half lie defense speech to a random judge - For that to be everlasting in the public eye, and domain?
A speech where you had to compromise your spirit in order not to be found guilty, and basically be strategic and humble/pathetic, in order to get off. (it`s just very private, is it not?)
He would be ridiculed forever for it.
He might be too proud for that I am thinking. It could also be the piss test? Who knows?
What are the rules about posting his court hearings after he is sentenced and found guilty?
Will the warnings against doing it still stand?
Will it be allowed then?
To me personally, its bonkers that people from the internet can follow and attend a personal trial-case regarding domestic issues online, or in person. (amusing as it may be). We are not talking about a traffic fine here.
Its not legal where I from. Your name wouldn't even appear anywhere if you asked the lawyer beforehand to make a name-ban for you. People wouldn't even be able to look the case up, unless they had your social security number, and many more personal details. Implicated names of witnesses, or victims, circumstances, places, would still be obscured, even if having all these other personal details above. And it certainly wouldn't be streamed online!
It might be very humbling to have all sorts of strangers following something this personal to him?
Domestic situations are of very personal caliber.