Movie & TV Show Recommendations

And one of the best bits of philosophical wisdom.
"Wherever you go, there you are." (Actually originally from a Buddhist book by a Westerner.)
Extensively quoted in the sets built for Star Trek: The Next Generation. (Generally invisible on broadcast TV in the 90s, I believe you can see it more often on HD video.)

IIRC more than one Starfleet ship had a plaque on the bridge indicating it was built at Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems.

A good friend of mine makes what I think is a fair case against Banzai, even though I don't agree with it, arguing that it is trying much too hard to be a weird cult movie, as opposed to something like Repo Man that comes by its weirdness honestly because it's made by a legit insane person. The fact of the matter is that I laughed my ass off regardless.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: AnOminous
A good friend of mine makes what I think is a fair case against Banzai, even though I don't agree with it, arguing that it is trying much too hard to be a weird cult movie, as opposed to something like Repo Man that comes by its weirdness honestly because it's made by a legit insane person. The fact of the matter is that I laughed my ass off regardless.
It was definitely trying, but actually succeeded. Also Repo Man had Harry Dean Stanton in it and you can't beat that.
 
After being increasingly disappointed by all of the other "Star shows" new content, especially with how abysmal Star Trek has been in the past decade, I've put aside my hangups of it being a mid-budget 90s sci-fi show and decided to watch Stargate SG-1, and it's a pure, refined gemerald. I wasn't expecting how SOVL it is, and that it isn't as low budget as I thought it was. I'm not finished it yet, and it's got like three other shows, but I would definitely recommend it for other sci-fi chuds who are disappointed by how bad Star Trek and Star Wars has become.

Check out Babylon 5 if you haven't before. Budget is lower (a lot lower in some cases) but the writing, characters and storyline are top-notch. I avoided it for years but I'm glad I finally gave it a chance.

The director is one of the dudes from whitest kids you know btw
Fucking WHAT?! I didn't realize it was that Zach.
Guess I have to watch it now, if only for Trevor (RIP).
 
And one of the best bits of philosophical wisdom.
"Wherever you go, there you are." (Actually originally from a Buddhist book by a Westerner.)
Quoted at the very end of my favorite movie for some reason.
 

Attachments

  • Beyond The Black Rainbow.webp
    Beyond The Black Rainbow.webp
    58.4 KB · Views: 22
If you appreciated FFC's 1974 masterpiece The Conversation, you should go to the theater to see the new film Relay starring Riz Ahmed. The less said about the plot the better, but it's a very smart thriller built around a premise I had never seen used before. And at it's heart, it's a slow burn character study, just like The Conversation.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 7778928
After being increasingly disappointed by all of the other "Star shows" new content, especially with how abysmal Star Trek has been in the past decade, I've put aside my hangups of it being a mid-budget 90s sci-fi show and decided to watch Stargate SG-1, and it's a pure, refined gemerald. I wasn't expecting how SOVL it is, and that it isn't as low budget as I thought it was. I'm not finished it yet, and it's got like three other shows, but I would definitely recommend it for other sci-fi chuds who are disappointed by how bad Star Trek and Star Wars has become.

Yeah, you have a lot of comfy seasons ahead of you. The OG show doesn't really drop in quality either.

The continuations like Stargate: Atlantis never really tickled my fancy so I can't speak to whether they're worth watching.

For those who give the first season a shot, don't worry about the woman. She's introduced as a GIRLPOWERZ lady and they very quickly drop that shit and turn her into an actual human being.

I think they were contractually obligated to have one propaganda episode each season also and you don't have to be raised in the '90s to spot them. It's also from a time when loving Jesus and picking humanity over bugs was still acceptable on television so get ready to spit out your coffee on occasion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: millais
The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension (1984) - Dr. Buckaroo Banzai, world renowned adventurer/neurosurgeon/rock star, along with his band "The Hong Kong Cavaliers", accidentaly discovers a way to penetrate through the 8th dimension with his rocket car. This catches the attention of some aliens who got stuck on Earth and want to get to their dimension for nefarious purposes, forcing Dr. Banzai to save the day. The film is an hour and 45 minutes minutes long but feels only half as long because almost every scene has something bizzare and baffling in it. While the film is undoubtedly absurd, the actors (some of which are well known, like C. Lloyd and J. Goldblum) take it completely seriously and act surprisingly natural and deadpan.

View attachment 7800593View attachment 7800595View attachment 7800597View attachment 7800598View attachment 7800599View attachment 7800601View attachment 7800602View attachment 7800603View attachment 7800604View attachment 7800605

It also has some of the best out-of-context quotes in film:
"Why me, John Bigbooty?"
"Blacks are on this planet! Here, in New Jersey!"
"Buckaroo, The White House wants to know is everything ok with the alien space craft from Planet 10 or should we just go ahead and destroy Russia?"
BB has some great ending credits too.

I randomly came upon this gem from the early 2000s:


It's definitely got a TV budget, but the CG is pretty good, even if its ambitions outweigh its abilities sometimes. It also has diversity that's justified within its own context; it allows nonwhite characters to be villainous and flawed, and it has a female lead who is strong without being a girlboss. The best part of it by far are the setting and set designs. They actually filmed on location in the Middle East, and the sets are gorgeous. Sometimes the film (actually a two part miniseries) has an artificial, composited look to it, but that adds to the storybook feel of the whole thing. It is just a bunch of stories being told by someone, after all.

One wonders how cool fantasy and other genres would have been if Hollywood continued in the vein of this series and made stories that everyone could enjoy, using the latest special effects techniques and good writing, rather than turning Hollywood into a goyslop machine designed to destroy everyone's love of genre fiction.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Čmarobnjak
The House That Jack Built is some amazing horror kino.
Yeah, one of the few movies that gave me the creeps while watching it. The way the violence is portrayed is so matter of fact and normalized (for Jack), it made it feel very authentic and unsettling. You have to be in the mood watch it, I'd not recommend it to everyone.

I saw Mission Impossible the Dead Final Reckoning Revengeance Part 2 yesterday.
If you ever thought the average video game plot where you have to chase macguffin from set piece to set piece was shit, this movie takes it to 11.
The dialogue is absolute tech mumbo jumbo nonsense, the cast is very, very diverse and unnecessary. The villain is a cartoon (not in a fun way, should have been in an Austin Powers movie or in a cappuccino commercial instead).

The theme music was never used in a cool way which sucked. But what sucked even more, the action was boring compared to the good MI movies, which was really disappointing. They should've stopped making them after the one with Henry Cavill in it.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Michael Wade
Tubi diving has revealed the recent upload of Tsui Hark's 1986 action-comedy Peking Opera Blues, set shortly after the collapse of the Qing dynasty, as the Republic of China is governed by it's second president, Yuan Shikai, whose grip on power is weak. Various factions struggles for power and territory are spreading across the country. Against this backdrop, three different women find their paths entwining in the capital of Peking (or Beijing, as it's been called for a while now.) Tsao Wan (Brigitte Lin), the Western-educated, mannishly-dressing daughter of a general who looks to be coming out on top in the struggle to be the local "king of the hill", is secretly a member of the democratic underground. She plots to steal documents that prove her father is helping Shikai secure foreign loans to stay in power. Bai Nu (Sally Yeh), the daughter of the manager of a Peking opera troupe, is disgruntled because she wants to perform onstage but her father forbids it, because women don't act. Sheung Hung (Cherie Chung), a giggly, impoverished musician, was performing at a general's mansion when soldiers upset over unpaid wages raided the home and in the chaos, she stole a box of valuable jewelry and while evading the police, stashed it on a wagon belonging to the troupe. She attempts to infiltrate the troupe's opera house and retrieve her loot. Nui and Hung become involved in the intrigue when Tsao Wan attempts to meet a revolutionary spy at the opera house while her father is taking in a performance, however local law enforcement is looking for them and along the way, these very different women have become unlikely friends....it's a real experience, there's disparate tones and genres at work here, but Tsui manages to make it all work together, with panache and a light touch. The film can go from whimsical to wrenching in a moment, staged acrobatic swordplay is followed immediately by over-the-top, intricately staged shootouts. It's also a great looking film and one of the real gems of that golden period of Hong Kong film in the 1980s and 1990s.
 
Last edited:
I fell asleep watching Kentucky Fried Movie last night, so I may as well throw it an endorsement, as its been recc'd here, before.

 
  • Like
Reactions: GameratePTSD
I watched this with a free Trial with AMC+. Absolutely fantastic documentary about an incredible person.
This Card Magician, Richard Turner does his craft while being BLIND. And he hates when anyone points out that he’s blind because he just wants to be recognized for being a magician. If you got an hour and a half to kill I definitely recommend watching it. It’s the story of making the most with what you’ve got.
 
Watched the Exit 8 movie. I would say this has to be the best game to movie adaptations. Shockly, they didn't screw this up! I'm not going to spoil anything because it's not supposed to be out. :epik:
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Fig Kommandant
I fell asleep watching Kentucky Fried Movie last night, so I may as well throw it an endorsement, as its been recc'd here, before.

I watched it a few days ago. There's a few good jokes, but I wasn't thrilled. I think I would have got a kick out of it if I was a college student in the 80s.

I watched Das Boot. What a fucking incredible movie. Just go watch it. I saw the German directors cut (3.5 hours) with subs(titles). Just check out this scene
 
The Outlander prequel "Blood of my Blood" is pretty good thus far. All White cast and cool Scottish costumes. There is one Sheboon in a minor role as the Madame at a brothel which is offputting.

It also has some really top notch WW1 battle scenes for Flashback scenes before two of the main characters travel back in time to the early 1700s.

 
Since Das Boot is regularly mentioned every page of this thread, and I already shared my thoughts about the modern TV series spinoff (pretty good, but gets pozzed/blacked during the last 2 seasons), now I just share my thoughts about the novel, which I read for the first time recently.

I read the English translation. As a translation, it's ok. My biggest complaint is that they convert all the metric measurements for depth, distance, weight, etc to English measurements,, which is a constant annoyance if you are accustomed to reading/thinking about U-boat stuff in metric. There are some occasional odd word choices and substitutions for translated technical terminology and naval jargon, but it's still pretty understandable overall.

The story is good. Naturally it's longer and more stretched out than the film.

The novel does a much better job of explaining the mechanics and workings of the U-boat's diving and underwater systems for the layman, especially the whole system of delicately balanced buoyancy and ballast tanks, which is a constant matter of life and death for the crew, even outside of combat. In the film, this aspect of the U-boat is reduced to "needle of depth gauge go up/down". In the novel, this is worked into the fabric of the story in a very natural way, and it is constantly being referenced and influencing the actions and direction of the plot, so you always know the buoyancy state of the boat.

The novel is also better at explaining and incorporating the whole 3-watch system for the crew. In the film, you have a vague idea that the crewmen are rotating on and off watch, but it's not exactly clear how that works or what they are all doing when on watch and off. And in the film, you get a general sense that the 1WO and 2WO are helping run the boat, but their role as leaders for 2 of the 3 watch groups is much clearer in the novel.

Also the role of the different command officers and technical officers on the boat is better explained and incorporated into the plot in the novel, besides giving those officers more characterization.

The iconic torpedo-attack and depth charge combat sequences in the novel are much the same as in the film, but explained in way more technical detail, so you have a very clear mental picture of the relative position of the boat and the target convoy, the defending escort destroyers, and the sinking depth charges. However, it's also explained in the book that the narrator character only has this comprehensive situational awareness because he tends to be stationed in the control room (zentrale), near the captain during these sequences, so he can overhear all the orders and snippets of dialog between the captain and other officers.

And in fact there are some points when a lot of stuff is going on and only the captain, in his own mind, has a clear picture of where the boat is positioned in relation to the enemy ships, and the entire rest of the crew and officers (including the narrator) is left in a fearful staste of ignorance about what is going on and just has to completely trust the captain's judgment and orders. But in the film, this is like the default state of situational awareness for the audience.

All the iconic sequences, and even the less dramatic sequences in the film are directly adapted from the novel, but often condensed or shortened in length, and of course stripped of the narrator's internal monologue and thoughts. One that really stood out as being condensed in the film was the storm sequence, which is much longer and much more intensely violent and terrifying in the novel, with the deck of the boat boat being frequently pitched almost perpendicular to the horizon by the rough seas, which would have been recklessly dangerous to do with the film's moving U-boat set.

Much more types of large and small encounters, events, and actions involving the U-boat crew and other ships, places, people, wreckage, etc take place in the novel than in the film, and many of these are borrowed or reimagined in the TV series to pad out the running time.

The novel has a lot of sometimes lengthy flashbacks or stories from the different crew and officers and narrator character. Many of these are grossly sexual in nature, but that's probably true to life, with young men at war and on leave in France.

The narrator is very clearly an artist and painter (as the author was in real life), in his obsessively detailed descriptions of the sky and sea when his character is on watch, but that seems true to life, too, since scrutinizing the sky and sea for threats and targets was the primary preoccupation for much of the war cruise.

Only 2 parts of the story seem implausible to me, from my limited knowledge of the U-boat war. One is that the boat is frequently mentioned to be diving below the maximum crush depth of submarines of that era, like 3 times deeper, but it's a pretty minor error that can be easily overlooked and ignored.

The second and bigger issue is that the boat's war cruise is explicitly mentioned to be taking place in the winter of 1941 - 1942, which is constantly referenced in the plot. This is right at the start of the so-called Second Happy Time, when the U-boats were scoring spectacular successes against the poorly defended American convoys and shipping after months of worsening losses against the British, and U-boat crew morale was consequently recovering and rising for a change.

But the tone of the story more closely resembles a war cruise in 1943, when U-boat crew morale was very low, the French naval bases and German homefront cities were being relentlessly pounded by RAF Bomber Command every night, convoys were dangerously well-defended, and air attack at sea was a constant and fatal threat. In the novel, much is made of the fact that the highly celebrated, early war U-boat aces of 1939-40 are all dead by 1941, which is true, and that the U-boat fleet was running low on experienced officers and crews and already scraping the bottom of the barrel with teenage conscripts, which seems less likely for 1941.

It's very easy to imagine the story taking place in 1943, so it's a bit of mystery to me why it is so explicitly set in winter of 1941.
 
Begotten experimental movie about human nature, philosophy of existence and exploring themes of death, rebirth and relationship between god, man and nature. Film has no dialogue and has harsh grainy visuals, graphic scenes and unsettling atmosphere with psychological horror elements.
 
Back
Top Bottom