Nader Elshamy / Daddy Naddy / Nader Saad Elshamy / نادر سعاد الشامی & Debbie-Ann Colbeck / Deedee.Loulou - Chef at Chef Cook, Romance Scammer, "Real Man," Failure at Everything, Convicted Stabber, Alleged Abuser/Rapist, Charity Scammer, Fucks Fat Chicks for Money, Semi-Closeted Homosexual, Loser, Liar, Coward + his degenerate girlfriend

Because the Egyptian President will have him hung if he sets foot back there. I don’t recall the reason. This is actually in the OP for this thread.
This is a bit funny. A tanker with an Egyptian crew was marooned in port with 1.5 years of unpaid wages, IIRC. By the Egyptian government who was the owner of the shipping company. The entire crew claimed asylum by saying the Egyptian government will kill them for demanding money and embarrassing the government owned company. Canadians being retards, they invited Crackula into Cuckada and the rest is hilarious history.
 
Because the Egyptian President will have him hung if he sets foot back there. I don’t recall the reason. This is actually in the OP for this thread.

Ok, that's what he claims. Or what Chantal said he claims. And maybe that's what he told the Canadian authorities and they fell for it.

He left because he has nothing there, no houses, no village (I don't know how many times he said when he came to Canada he had 80 bucks in his pocket, I think it was 80). And because he wanted to have his freedom to drink, take drugs, whore around with men and women, while at the same time keeping the parts that he likes from his culture like abusing women and the anti-Semitism. A story as old as time. Or at least as old as the first time some fake refugee crossed a Western border. And yes, I said fake refugee, I'm not saying there aren't real ones. But I don't think he is one of them.
 
Wasn’t there some claim of a shipmate being killed? I don’t remember who was the supposed killer. Maybe Nada was a witness or he retaliated against someone? Some version of this is stuck in my head.
Yes. The dead dude was supposedly Nader’s best friend. He said a few times, it was suspected that Nader played some role in his death, so he jumped ship once it docked in Canada. Pays to remember though that Nader is an even bigger liar and fraud than Foodie herself. I doubt any of the stories he’s told are true. If there was a friend, and there was a death, given the company he kept, the dude likely ODed.
 
Look who is doxxing again, DeeDee PooPoo and crackhead made the video private, they think we can't report them and if the video is not available to the public it didn't happen.
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    45.1 KB · Views: 126
Just think. Before Nader met Chinny he barely knew about YouTube. It took him FOUR MONTHS to realize she was talking about him on the interwebs. Now he's as immersed in Gorlworld as she is.
Remember, Nosferatooth has gone deeper in GW than any of us. He was balls deep in Guntal and she is a world of her own.
 
Some yt channel is reporting deedee and nader got married
There is no confirmation, but there is a screenshot of Nader wearing what appears to be a wedding band on his left ring finger in the Nader El Shamy thread.
DeeDee and Nader are by the laws of Quebec, in a common law marriage. I doubt that they actually bothered to be married en papier, but if they did indeed formalize their union, I suspect it was done to attempt to secure some type of status as far as his citizenship is concerned. I believe that he is terrified that if he is found guilty of the rape of Mae, he faces not only jail time, but he may be deported. Perhaps having a "wife" in Quebec would mitigate Canada sending the motherfucker back to the sandy shithole he came from.
Inshallah, both he and DeeDee get what they deserve.

eta: It also occurred to me that if that condo is in DeeDee's name only, perhaps formalizing their marriage would insure Nader inherits the condo if DeeDee dies. HOWEVER this is just me speculating, and I have ZERO idea how Quebec's inheritance laws work.
 
Some yt channel is reporting deedee and nader got married Anyone legit can confirm this? A youtube named rampage reported this. It sounds like fake crap to me but who knows. Someone said they were common law married anyway per canada law but i have no clue how that works.
According to Dr. Google:

In Canada, a common-law relationship is defined as a couple living together in a conjugal relationship without being legally married. The Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) states that the couple must have lived together continuously for at least one year. However, the criteria for common-law relationships vary by province:
  • Saskatchewan and Quebec: Living together continuously for at least two years
  • Federal: Living together for 12 continuous months, sharing a child by birth or adoption, or one partner having custody of the other's child
In Ontario, Canada, two people are considered common law partners if they have been continuously living together in a conjugal relationship for at least three years. If they have a child together by birth or adoption, then they only need to have been living together for one year.

Ugh, if they did in fact get married, those two low-life degenerates deserve each other.

If true, I wonder how Chantal will react. Will she even mention it? After all, she's been happily married to her "handsomest husband" for nearly two years now. Or so she claims.

ETA: partially ninjaed by @Botchy Galoop
 
Last edited:
The Lachine fungus just want ppl to speculate about them being married. Perhaps they are under his lawyer’s advice so she won’t be called to testify against him. At any rate they deserve each other since they are both trash!

Now let’s wait until Foodie hears about it. LOL

You are considered common law in Quebec for tax purposes after living together continuously for at least two years. It's very important to note that in Quebec, unless you're legally married, your spouse will be entitled to nothing if you pass away.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2441.jpeg
    IMG_2441.jpeg
    213 KB · Views: 38
There is no confirmation, but there is a screenshot of Nader wearing what appears to be a wedding band on his left ring finger in the Nader El Shamy thread.
DeeDee and Nader are by the laws of Quebec, in a common law marriage. I doubt that they actually bothered to be married en papier, but if they did indeed formalize their union, I suspect it was done to attempt to secure some type of status as far as his citizenship is concerned. I believe that he is terrified that if he is found guilty of the rape of Mae, he faces not only jail time, but he may be deported. Perhaps having a "wife" in Quebec would mitigate Canada sending the motherfucker back to the sandy shithole he came from.
Inshallah, both he and DeeDee get what they deserve.

eta: It also occurred to me that if that condo is in DeeDee's name only, perhaps formalizing their marriage would insure Nader inherits the condo if DeeDee dies. HOWEVER this is just me speculating, and I have ZERO idea how Quebec's inheritance laws work.
They can be considered common law after two years however, they would have to be legally married for the spouse to be entitled to anything when the other passes in Quebec.
 
IF they're married and not just acting for the camera, it's going to be because of some legal thing. Inheritance, or... do spouses have to testify against each other in court in Canada? In the US you don't have to.

Have they shown a marriage certificate? I still wouldn't trust that it wasn't faked for internet drama points.
 
IF they're married and not just acting for the camera, it's going to be because of some legal thing. Inheritance, or... do spouses have to testify against each other in court in Canada? In the US you don't have to.

Have they shown a marriage certificate? I still wouldn't trust that it wasn't faked for internet drama points.
IIRC there are some differences in marital privilege between Canada and the US.

In the USA, spouses cannot testify about communications with their spouse.

In Canada, the martial communications privilege means that DooDoo can be subpoenaed to testify, but can choose to not testify about communications that occurred during the marriage. The choice is entirely hers whether she does or not, Nader doesn’t get a say. And the privilege only applies to communication that occurred during the marriage. It doesn’t protect anything from before being legally married.
 
Back