💤 Inactive nattycomic / stephen a. winchell / @sawinchell - sjw webcomic about beating up people who hold doors for women. VROOM VROOM!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Broseph Stalin said:
She also got a weird looking tattoo of a grumpy looking fat chick on her thigh, apparently.
Click to expand...

That would be Nancy, the titular character in a comic strip that, during its heyday, could be wonderfully weird and absurdist. It recently got a new artist who has been trying to modernize the strip while returning to the spirit Ernie Bushmiller established. Obviously, it's not as good as the classic Nancy, but it's not too shabby. Definitely better than Guy Gilchrist's take on Nancy.

Not surprised Steve would try to tie Natty to a pretty successful comic strip reboot that people actually like.

Also:

732fe98992ca23ee6272edabe30e99bf.png


Where have I seen this exact pose and expression before?
 
Are we still trying to turn Natty into the new Ben Garrison?

The Nazi edits of this guy's comics cracked me up a while back.
 
And for the first time, Steve shows some diversity in his comics by adding some kind of Indian looking chick.

Other than that, I'm still trying to figure out what the fuck he did wrong. Thoughts?


natty58.jpg
 
CasualSeppuku said:
The guy ordered for the girl instead of letting her pick whatever she wanted to eat herself.
Click to expand...
It's always the casual outdated chivalry crap that get made into these revenge fantasy comics. No comics about a abusive bf or a woman getting raped/murdered in Saudi Arabia, just all the banal casual shit that happens because the 1950s was only 2 generations ago.
 
Toxinophile said:
It's always the casual outdated chivalry crap that get made into these revenge fantasy comics. No comics about a abusive bf or a woman getting raped/murdered in Saudi Arabia, just all the banal casual shit that happens because the 1950s was only 2 generations ago.
Click to expand...
It's sad to be on the other side of history it seems. We were just raised the way our parents thought things were done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom