NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus


Yet another thread of failed "artists" screeching fuck you at random people playing with ai art tools that would have never in a million years hired one of them to produce anything. Sorry that your Sonic OC Fan Commission dream job didn't lift you out from living with your parents, it was never going to and you always knew that.
 

Yet another thread of failed "artists" screeching fuck you at random people playing with ai art tools that would have never in a million years hired one of them to produce anything. Sorry that your Sonic OC Fan Commission dream job didn't lift you out from living with your parents, it was never going to and you always knew that.
What’s even the problem with AI art? That one guy cheated a contest with it?
 
I cry for the coal miners and pokemon ship artists.
ghjfgjhghjghjghdf.png
fghfgjhghjghjdf.png
fghfdjhfgjhgh.png

Havent seen a perm for making fun of a mod in awhile
Her argument boils down to "you dont deserve to be able to produce things for free because you didnt spend as much time learning it as me"
 
AI art that scrapes images to make pictures is a bit shady, but we're just now getting AI that makes truly original images and it's turning out better than what most artists can produce themselves so what will be the excuse then? I understand being afraid of change, my job will probably be taken by a robot within the next 20 years, but if your art was truly unique you would always have people seeking you out for your style specifically regardless - most AI art is fairly generic anime style.
 
What’s even the problem with AI art? That one guy cheated a contest with it?
They go on and on about how it steals from other artists, but I've yet to see an instant where someone takes AI art and explicitly shows what it "stole" from. It's just a vague "Somewhere, out there, some piece of art was maybe traced" and that's about it.
 
They think that the AI is taking artists jobs away, and that it is "stealing" their art by scraping publicly posted images.
Aren't these the same useless fucks who have been gloating for years about how luxury space communism is going to get rid of everyone else's jobs?
They go on and on about how it steals from other artists, but I've yet to see an instant where someone takes AI art and explicitly shows what it "stole" from.
And 99% of these fuckers if you went through their "portfolio" you could find where they'd themselves directly traced, that is, literally plagiarized, from some Google Image Search result.
 
On podcast I listen to they had some actual professional artists talking about AI art and they were both massively enthusiastic about it.

They had actually worked it into their own art, using to make quick concept pieces that they can use to get a good idea of what they want to make before they actually start drawing.

Also drinking heavily and sending each other stupid shit they think of, such as an AI art rendering of the minions crucifying Shrek.

They were sure that real artists weren't in jeopardy and just mechanical artists doing low skill mass production who were probably going to lose their job to some third world sweat shop eventually were the only ones with anything to fear.
 
A lot of these lefty hipster weirdos draw either furry or loli/shota commissions and they make enough off it to afford an efficiency apartment and some tendies.
Many of the fandom illustrators are already drawing other people's IPs too. There often ends up being a dominant set of artists in these communities, so I think the more realistic fear of these fur-famous types is that less known artists will just rip off their style wholesale and then undersell them. Because they're already on shaky legal ground themselves, there will be about nothing they can actually do about this.
 
Aren't these the same useless fucks who have been gloating for years about how luxury space communism is going to get rid of everyone else's jobs?

ARTPRINTER.png

What I find funny about the AI art debate is that, a whole year before this, OpenAI's GPT was fully capable of generating premises for novels, as well as entire semi-competent scenes that only really needed a little bit of touch-up from an editor for coherency and continuity. The idea of a partly AI-generated novel using GPT wasn't farfetched at all. You could roll up to NaNoWriMo with a 50,000 word novella having only written not even half of that in prompts and then editing and shoehorning the AI's spew into something readable in a few days. It was doable.

You didn't hear even a peep from authors about this. No complaint. None. Writers just didn't give a shit, at all. They knew AI could replace their jobs. They knew it was trained on a huge corpus of text that might even include their own. There might have been a couple articles like, "Oh yeah, it's wild how far AI has come", but nobody really cared.

But then, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, and Midjourney started rolling out, and instantly, thousands of "artistes" collectively lost their fucking minds, whining about "NFT techbros stealing our art".

The funny thing about these woke artists is that they are indeed behaving just like protectionist workers in mid-century labor unions who complained about their jobs being replaced. You know, the same exact blue-collar tradies from the Rust Belt that the Left constantly whine about being uncultured, deplorable philistines with racist, sexist views, whose jobs ought to be outsourced to leave them starving and destitute. Funny how all it took was their livelihoods being threatened to take these very committed and loyal Techno-Trotskyites and turn them into luddite ancaps and have them start marching around staking their property lines overnight. They're all like, "Why don't you just learn to draw your own art? Wargle bargle".

You could argue that they're being elitist and ableist by restricting tools that could allow paraplegics and retards to make competent art, and watch their cognitive dissonance melt these hypocrites walnut-sized brains into a fucking puddle. Moreover, they're pretty damn arrogant if they think that people will just ignore and stop using algorithms that can do shit like, "A stormtrooper eating a pizza with his helmet on", or, "An HR Giger style Lancia Stratos", or, "A mammoth-tank".

Gnosys_a_stormtrooper_eating_a_pizza_with_his_helmet_still_on_402659b7-8411-489f-b850-39ba4c83...pngGnosys_lancia_stratos_zero_in_the_style_of_HR_Giger_e1c5a5d0-2cad-4a61-a71c-fb9f998c2ce8.pngGnosys_Medieval_GDI_mammoth_tank_from_Command_and_Conquer_in_th_1845a213-bf59-4d59-98bd-930c8f...png

It's instant and practically free. You can't even make an environmentalist argument against this because the watt-hour usage for each generation is so low, it's less than the damn light above your drafting board or the power to run your workstation and graphics tablet for hours on end while you draw. This is the kind of return on investment that corporations literally kill for. It's not going away. It's only going to keep advancing.
 
A lot of these lefty hipster weirdos draw either furry or loli/shota commissions and they make enough off it to afford an efficiency apartment and some tendies.

The idea that perverts will be able to generate their own fap material for free scares the absolute shit out of them because that means they have to get jobs.

I've seen this before. Once digital photography took off the "Professional" Photographers were crying about people giving away their photos for free online, "Your hurting us". They knew the grift was up when average Joe Schmo could take a photo indistinguishable from a professional one (Outside of studio and outdoor lighting setups).

Those same photographers that didn't drop their prices when they no longer needed to buy film or pay for processing or probably even printing as the world had gone digital.

All these "artists" now will eventually use AI art generation and pass it off as their own for a fee like the hypocrites they always are.

All my photos are free and anyone can use them, bare minimum they ask me and give me a photo credit. I'm not going to copyright strike anyone of they don't though. My pictures have been used on major websites, various student work, printed in a book, Youtube B-roll and once on TV. I enjoy taking them and working them up and if that is useful to someone else then I'm happy.
 
A lot of these lefty hipster weirdos draw either furry or loli/shota commissions and they make enough off it to afford an efficiency apartment and some tendies.

The idea that perverts will be able to generate their own fap material for free scares the absolute shit out of them because that means they have to get jobs.
I wonder which will win. The furry's autism at wanting something very particular, or the furry's hedonism and desire for constant novelty.
 
They think that the AI is taking artists jobs away, and that it is "stealing" their art by scraping publicly posted images.
That’s funny because I don’t see it as stealing if nothing of value is lost. And really, is anything being lost with AI art?

They go on and on about how it steals from other artists, but I've yet to see an instant where someone takes AI art and explicitly shows what it "stole" from. It's just a vague "Somewhere, out there, some piece of art was maybe traced" and that's about it.
It forms some weird facsimiles of several images that don’t resemble any single image. Once again, what is being stolen?

The idea that perverts will be able to generate their own fap material for free scares the absolute shit out of them because that means they have to get jobs.
/trash/ is way ahead of you on that front.
 

Yet another thread of failed "artists" screeching fuck you at random people playing with ai art tools that would have never in a million years hired one of them to produce anything. Sorry that your Sonic OC Fan Commission dream job didn't lift you out from living with your parents, it was never going to and you always knew that.
These are the same sorts of people who for years said, "if your job can be replaced by a computer you don't deserve it" or something to that effect. They also claimed that a computer could never replicate art or music.... and now they want sympathy.

lol no.
 
I think what is funny to me is that we are getting a lecture of what art is from the same people who said duct taping a banana to a wall was art. They already set the low standards with the modern art scams. Generating a nice looking picture has to be better than some pretentious twat throwing rubbish around a white room and saying it represents the struggle of Iranian dirt farmers. The words i have for these faggots is lol learn to be an electrician bro.
 
They go on and on about how it steals from other artists, but I've yet to see an instant where someone takes AI art and explicitly shows what it "stole" from. It's just a vague "Somewhere, out there, some piece of art was maybe traced" and that's about it.
Eh, the argument of "i didn't see it so it doesn't happen" is a terrible argument.
It already happened, someone just watch a stream of an artist, took his pic, fed it to ai and got a very similar result and pass it off as his own, claiming the artist stole it. Another post it to a competition and won, just because the judges haven't caught up to ai art yet. There are still other examples.

While the arguments "ai art will kill art jobs" is very hyperbolic, people have the right not to have their art scraped and use for ai. There are plenty of ai art that have the artist's signature leftovers.
 
Back