NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus

Firefox_Screenshot_2025-12-10T07-24-11.734Z.png
Firefox_Screenshot_2025-12-10T07-23-39.435Z.png

ohhh.gif

Firefox_Screenshot_2025-12-10T07-16-32.434Z.png
Firefox_Screenshot_2025-12-10T07-16-49.731Z.png

"just want trans people to be left alone"

Isn't that what this bill does, leaves the trannies alone? They have to pay for their own mutilation and drugs not made for them, so the ones that can't afford it won't be as fucked up if/when they snap out of it.

Some recent-ish bans:

Firefox_Screenshot_2025-12-10T07-18-27.786Z.png
Firefox_Screenshot_2025-12-10T07-15-29.303Z.png
Firefox_Screenshot_2025-12-10T07-15-58.524Z.png
 
The DigitalOp ban is probably the hardest on the community, and also one that'll most likely be reversed within a week or so. The fact is that the mods need his harassment of junies to thin the herd and act as a bouncer.

Bullet Club said:
Isn't that what this bill does, leaves the trannies alone?
Click to expand...
Echoes lives in the UK. All procedures like the much celebrated puberty blockers to SRS are done through the NHS.
Echoes does a good job at exposing the biggest issue I have with socialized healthcare which is that their whole road to their becoming (from taking the first e-pill to the tracheal-shave and boob implants) are on the taxpayer's tab.
In the US you get to choose if you want to pay for this surgical horrorshow but euros will pay 51% of their income towards abetting in autogynephilia or go to prison.
 
I Know 孤独のせい said:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/va...-is-valid-and-not-subject-to-removal.1378507/

View attachment 8271071
View attachment 8271070
View attachment 8271069
View attachment 8271068
View attachment 8271067
View attachment 8271066

BASED OUT OF SPACE !!!
Click to expand...
The “it had muslims” review is straight up synthetic man-style retardation, but the other review at least gets a little more specific. I’m all for trashing games that are stealth DEI projects, but if people are going to talk about it, I wish they would do so intelligently instead of writing like retards that only have a surface-level understanding of the issues behind why “woke” and DEI suck.
 
Last edited:
Großmann said:
The “it had muslims” review is straight up synthetic man-style retardation, but the other reviews at least get’s a little more specific. I’m all for trashing games that are stealth DEI projects, but if people are going to talk about it, I wish they would do so intelligently instead of writing like retards that only have a surface-level understanding of the issues behind why “woke” and DEI suck.
Click to expand...
Not that you are wrong, but I think the "quality" of the review and its critique are less in the spotlight here, and it's the sheer audacity that we evil people have calling DEI and all that it entails out. How dare you simply state that you don't want that in your game. It's the fundamental issue that certain things are not allowed to be viewed negatively. Islam, Muslims, minorities, LGBTQ+2IOU, diversity and so on. You are not allowed to say or think anything about it that isn't sanctioned by the greater good. It's basically thought police. Insulting, degrading, calling for violence, erasing things like heterosexuality, "white" people, European heritage, homogenous societies and so on are a free for all.

I have been watching the Yogscast Jingle Jam on and off since it started and when they were playing Civ 5 someone donated money for a city to be called trans rights. And usually for a Yogscast Civ game, the nukes are flying everywhere towards the end. A big portion of the chat were constantly saying you are not allowed/ can not nuke the city trans rights. As if it was a law of physics. It's an unmoveable dogma, that you can not disagree or steer away from it.

That was the primary issue here. But you are right, it would be more constructive to attempt to write a review that entails more than just " NO MUSLIMS/ NIGGAS / TRANNIES".
 
I Know 孤独のせい said:
Not that you are wrong, but I think the "quality" of the review and its critique are less in the spotlight here, and it's the sheer audacity that we evil people have calling DEI and all that it entails out. How dare you simply state that you don't want that in your game. It's the fundamental issue that certain things are not allowed to be viewed negatively. Islam, Muslims, minorities, LGBTQ+2IOU, diversity and so on. You are not allowed to say or think anything about it that isn't sanctioned by the greater good. It's basically thought police. Insulting, degrading, calling for violence, erasing things like heterosexuality, "white" people, European heritage, homogenous societies and so on are a free for all.

I have been watching the Yogscast Jingle Jam on and off since it started and when they were playing Civ 5 someone donated money for a city to be called trans rights. And usually for a Yogscast Civ game, the nukes are flying everywhere towards the end. A big portion of the chat were constantly saying you are not allowed/ can not nuke the city trans rights. As if it was a law of physics. It's an unmoveable dogma, that you can not disagree or steer away from it.

That was the primary issue here. But you are right, it would be more constructive to attempt to write a review that entails more than just " NO MUSLIMS/ NIGGAS / TRANNIES".
Click to expand...
Yeah, I know why the retardera morons are upset, but it does no one any favors for people like the steam reviewer to shit out an unbaked critique. It just makes people against DEI look stupid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom