Fundamentalist are a small minority in the christian world. Even then, I'd take the fundamentalist christian over the best SJW there is..
On one side, you have people who built the world as we know it today. Beautiful church, spread Jesus's word, shaped nations as we know them today, made Latin american and african believe in Jesus instead of their bullshit baby-eater gods... On the other side, you have dumb and weak people that are nothing but parasite to our society. People that push for male to fuck each-others, women to become man and want western societies to crumble.
By the way, Darwin's theory is mostly bullshit as far as science goes. That's why it's called a theory. Nobody with half a brain believe monkeys are human ancestors anymore (which was the major point of Darwin). That's not how science works and in hindsight, they were perfectly right to fight against the way it was going to be taught as school. It's like gender studies, to some extent. Bullshit pushed by atheist.
*gawks*
Ok, ok. I'll try to be very nice to you. Since you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. My entire body is screaming, but since I am an expert in the subject, and education is a major part of my job, I'll be nice. Just this once.
1. Theories are the highest form of knowledge in science. Theories are comprised of hundreds, sometimes thousands of experiments, repeated over and over and over again. They are literally the strongest thing in the scientific community, built up over decades and sometimes centuries. They trump everything. In 1890, there were two competing theories on the nature of disease. The miasma hypothesis, in which decaying organic matter in the air was thought to cause disease. Or the germ hypothesis, in which organisms too small to see caused disease. Currently, the germ hypothesis was accepted, tested and proven over decades. It became the Germ Theory of Disease. The Law of Gravity is actually the theory of gravity. Law and Theory mean the same thing in science. Science, by its nature, is designed to be changed at any moment when new information comes out. Scientists found the word 'law' too restrictive. The word law is archaic jargon which has been replaced by theory. Same thing with Einsten. Its the theory of relativity.
You're using theory as a layman's term. Theory is specifically scientific jargon which means something completely and utterly different.
2. We did not evolve from any living species that is still here on Earth. Darwin never said that, never postulated that. It was propaganda by his critics to strawman him and make it not taught in schools. Evolution isn't all or nothing. Look at this diagram.
The red dots are what we call common ancestors. These are intermediate species of which we have no record. They were a result of interbreeding or a sudden shift in evolution. They're also commonly called 'missing links'. The initial ape species we branched off of doesn't exist in the modern world, nor nobody really knows what it was. It was a transitory species on the way to becoming another one. Nothing right now exists that humans actually evolved from millions of years ago.
I'll use another part of the chart to demonstrate:
Hominia was before our current species. Each dot, again, represents a transient spaces on the way to the 'homo' genus. As you can see, Chimps split off from the Hominia genus. We did not evolve from chimps. We are primates, but so are a lot of other species. As you can see, even chimps had a common ancestor that they split off from. Missing links are important because it gives us insight into how species evolve over long periods or 'burst' periods. As you can see, we're missing a lot of links between Hominia and Homo genuses. Its basically an estimate due to the branching of other species and genetic differences.
Saying humans evolved from apes is an extremely simple and frankly extraordinarily ignorant understanding of how evolution functions. When you look at a chimp at a zoo, you're not looking at you in the past. Millions of years ago we had a common ancestor that is long since extinct. We say we're most closely related to chimps because that's the last true ape species that branched off from us before human evolution started. That and any other closer species is extinct. And that's still a millions of years on the road to us. Do not confuse 'closely related' with 'evolved from'.
We're also closely related to a worm because it shares 70% of our genetic code.
So no, it has absolutely no comparison to gender studies. And frankly, comparing it to gender studies is so ignorant, you really need to read more on the subject. It is not pushed by atheists. Every scientist on the planet who is serious about their craft, including Buddhists, Indians, Muslims and Christians, know that the theory of evolution is one of the most solid scientific principles there. The Catholic Church recognizes it. Catholic Institutions, like Notre Dame, recognize it. To say its pushed by atheists, sorry to say, makes you look like an idiot.
3. The major point of Darwin is not humans evolved from apes. That's so far from Darwin's argument you may be in another galaxy. Darwin's study of finches made him think about evolution. Different birds had adapted to the island by beak shape, best to fit an ecological niche. Each species filled a role and fed on specific seeds on the island thanks to the shape of their beaks. Its called adaptive radiation. This is because the environment is so diverse and competition is so fierce, each finch evolved to fill a specific role in order not to compete with the other in order to not go extinct.
So please, learn before you say something you have no idea about.
