- Joined
- Mar 12, 2020
@Buttigieg2020 spelled out most of the recent reasons, but I think a lot of it comes from rhetoric between Jason Schreier and Jim Sterling over the years. They were always keen to point out that Kotick's annual compensation before coof was usually 30 million (almost 90% of which isn't actual money) compared to the average Activision employee's high 5 - low 6 figure range, especially when layoffs would happen. Nevermind those layoffs being of mostly bureaucracy, esports, marketing and mobile game people (the same people that Sterling literally said should be out of work to reduce game budgets and because mobile game devs are parasites), and nevermind that contract expirations where mixed in with that number (happens a lot with QA in the industry) and nevermind the fact that Activision was actually increasing their developer workforce, in one instance by 20%. This was a sign of Kotick's unique late stage capitalist despotism. Doesn't help that Activision is generally disliked in "gaming circles" for legitimate reasons that are then delegitimized by the fact that the market keeps rewarding them.The intense hate for Kotick from the left is so puzzling. What exactly has he done to earn so much hate? As far as I know he’s just a typical super rich guy. I get that they have to hate anyone who’s rich (except Bill Gates because he cares about important things like depopulating Africa), but Kotick seems to get a lot more hate than the average rich CEO.
I have to assume it’s because he’s a ginger, one of the few minorities you’re still allowed to hate unconditionally.
The left is chronically illiterate on economic and post-headline-reading levels, and unable to process numerical data. You're dealing with people who think that Jeff Bezos could give the entire US population a million dollars. Schreier writes for Bloomberg and thinks it should be illegal to be a billionaire. No surprise they've made a villain out of Kotick.