That would be because NeoGAF genuinely believes that if their hivemind takes offense to something or someone, it has no right to exist.
Any time one of their would-be victims has the common-sense to give them the finger, they fucking never let it go. Kojima told them to fuck off during MGSV, and three years hence, they're still whining about Quiet. Their bitching about Marvelous and XSeed never stops, nor does their boundless hatred for anyone who so much as disagrees tangentially with them. NeoGAF is still unironically whining about GG in 2017, FFS.
It must be difficult to be so fucking angry and miserable all the time. I can only reason that they enjoy it.
You know what I find amusing about all the game developers they shit on?
Those game devs refuse to pander to people who complain about their original artistic vision, nor will they betray the people who actually pay money for their products, and NeoGAF still wants them to commit financial and artistic suicide just to appease their feelings.
It's selfish and stupid of them to expect, but I just described the NeoGAF hivemind, so it's no surprise, and for further irony, they remind me of another historical example of whiny busybodies wanting an artist to compromise his art just because they got triggered.
Gustave Flaubert, the writer of the story Madame Bovary, he got the exact same reaction to his work, which was a story about a woman who realizes she has an adultery fetish, and rather than resist it, she eventually gives in and discovers she's happier for it.
The triggered hivemind of his day was LIVID about this story because in his day and age, adultery had to be condemned as morally wrong, no matter what, and even if a character enjoyed it, someone or something had to happen in any media depicting it reminding the audience it was WRONG anyway, because it was in vogue at the time to do so.
Flaubert didn't give a shit. He wrote his story the way he intended, dammit, and when they tried to take him to court for corrupting public morals, he won a court case in which it was established art should be viewed with respect to the artist's vision, and that they didn't have to bow to the whims of some triggered interest group if they didn't have to, because he never intended to do anything other than write a story for the sake of writing a story, he had no intention of writing it to influence public morality one way or the other.
The irony abounds in that Flaubert was highly sympathetic to those who engaged in adultery, polyamory, open relationships, homosexuality, and various other things NeoGAF ironically whines about not being represented enough in media today, but had their userbase existed in his time, they would have been condemning him and his work because that's what the hivemind did back then, especially because it was popular to shit on work like Flaubert's and no one then wanted to be seen dissenting with that opinion because the hivemind then would turn on you.
It's sad to see history has repeated itself.