NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus

Jessica Price is a former Paizo employee and now-former Guildwars 2 writer that Jake Alley feverishly and hopelessly orbits in the hopes that she can help him land a gaming-related job.

She is a huge SJW and probably the biggest and most dis-likeable harpy we've covered on here, no thread yet, though I believe she deserves one at this point.
Yes, this. She has pure, unbridled hatred towards all men. If you look at her Twitter pic you'd at least think she's not bad looking but that thing had been up forever. She's a run down beastie now.

When someone she didn't like died of cancer her tweet was "the best thing I can say is at least they are no longer around to do any harm". When I checked her Twitter her feed was full of people throwing that line back at her now that she's out on her ass.

And I agree, she's worthy of her own thread. The bile and hatred she spews is at times mesmerizing. She sounds like someone's miserable 75 year old aunt who's been beaten down by life but I think she's only in her thirties
 
The player she acted like a cunt to was supposedly one of the biggest streamers in guildwars 2. Guy has a npc named after in game I heard too. So it wasn't just a random player. She attacked one of the communities biggest and most popular voices. Bitch was so full of herself she probably thought it was just a nobody of consequence. Being bothered to learn the major voices of the community of game you work on is too much work for dumb asses like her.
 
How about having the bot categorize bans and report stats on what the most common reasons are? They have a pretty short list of favorite stock excuses, so it wouldn't be hard to just pattern-match them. Off the top of my head: "trans", "derail", "junior", "whataboutism", "troll", "downplaying", "talking about games". If you want you could actually tabulate the frequency of words in bans to find candidates, but it might be overkill.
Don't forget "arguing in bad faith". That one might dwarf all the others.
 
As I'm sure you are aware, ResetEra people are advocating for violence against teens who disagree with them politically here; https://www.resetera.com/threads/16...da-thrown-at-him-at-whataburger.53567/page-25
(It is about the 16 year old kid being attacked by some 30 year old)

Mods are fine with it as well. (no bans) Last page especially is filled with this rhetoric. I've attached an example of a modern civil rights movement here. The civil right to "assault teens I don't like," of course.
Resetard.png
 
As I'm sure you are aware, ResetEra people are advocating for violence against teens who disagree with them politically here; https://www.resetera.com/threads/16...da-thrown-at-him-at-whataburger.53567/page-25
(It is about the 16 year old kid being attacked by some 30 year old)

Mods are fine with it as well. (no bans) Last page especially is filled with this rhetoric. I've attached an example of a modern civil rights movement here. The civil right to "assault teens I don't like," of course.
I wonder if this poster could even beat up a 16 year old if he wanted to
 
As I'm sure you are aware, ResetEra people are advocating for violence against teens who disagree with them politically here; https://www.resetera.com/threads/16...da-thrown-at-him-at-whataburger.53567/page-25
(It is about the 16 year old kid being attacked by some 30 year old)

Mods are fine with it as well. (no bans) Last page especially is filled with this rhetoric. I've attached an example of a modern civil rights movement here. The civil right to "assault teens I don't like," of course.
I hope you don't mind me attaching a few more posts from that page, because goddamn I think people here need to see how far gone some of the users there are.
screenshot-www.resetera.com-2018-07-06-12-39-06.png
Weird fallacy argument where voting is apparently no longer an option because "the candidate wasn't good enough." That isn't the fault of the people on the right, I imagine if Hillary had a platform that appealed to them they would vote for her.
screenshot-www.resetera.com-2018-07-06-12-38-55.png
Straight up MovieBob rhetoric.
screenshot-www.resetera.com-2018-07-06-12-37-33.png
A literal "right side of history" argument.
screenshot-www.resetera.com-2018-07-06-12-36-37.png
And someone who thinks moderates are just as bad as nazis. What a wonderful assortment of people.
Edit: screenshot-www.resetera.com-2018-07-06-12-52-52.png
I wonder why :roll:
 
Last edited:
As I'm sure you are aware, ResetEra people are advocating for violence against teens who disagree with them politically here; https://www.resetera.com/threads/16...da-thrown-at-him-at-whataburger.53567/page-25
(It is about the 16 year old kid being attacked by some 30 year old)

Mods are fine with it as well. (no bans) Last page especially is filled with this rhetoric. I've attached an example of a modern civil rights movement here. The civil right to "assault teens I don't like," of course.
>That's not how slavery ended
>That's not how Civil Rights was established


Did this poster just forget MLK's message of nonviolence? How he specifically stated, "Hate cannot drive out hate"?
Hell, the civil rights movement had people like Frederick Douglass at the forefront, orating and debating those who saw blacks as less than human. Disproving all previously held stereotypes that racists back then had.

And this sackless fuckface actually wants to claim that they were brought about by using Antifa style violent hit-and-run tactics?

Fuck this site and its users. It can't even get history right.
 
>That's not how slavery ended
>That's not how Civil Rights was established


Did this poster just forget MLK's message of nonviolence? How he specifically stated, "Hate cannot drive out hate"?
Hell, the civil rights movement had people like Frederick Douglass at the forefront, orating and debating those who saw blacks as less than human. Disproving all previously held stereotypes that racists back then had.

And this sackless fuckface actually wants to claim that they were brought about by using Antifa style violent hit-and-run tactics?

Fuck this site and its users. It can't even get history right.
Here's REE's response to that very well thought out post:
screenshot-www.resetera.com-2018-07-06-12-59-44.png
 
As I'm sure you are aware, ResetEra people are advocating for violence against teens who disagree with them politically here; https://www.resetera.com/threads/16...da-thrown-at-him-at-whataburger.53567/page-25
(It is about the 16 year old kid being attacked by some 30 year old)

Mods are fine with it as well. (no bans) Last page especially is filled with this rhetoric. I've attached an example of a modern civil rights movement here. The civil right to "assault teens I don't like," of course.

I hope you don't mind me attaching a few more posts from that page, because goddamn I think people here need to see how far gone some of the users there are.
View attachment 489757
Weird fallacy argument where voting is apparently no longer an option because "the candidate wasn't good enough." That isn't the fault of the people on the right, I imagine if Hillary had a platform that appealed to them they would vote for her.
View attachment 489759
Straight up MovieBob rhetoric.
View attachment 489760
A literal "right side of history" argument.
View attachment 489761
And someone who thinks moderates are just as bad as nazis. What a wonderful assortment of people.
Edit: View attachment 489779
I wonder why :roll:

A big part of that thread is the sheer projection of the users. I only took a look at the last page, and saw ONE post I agreed with/liked by that Premium fella.

ree.png

And of course the responses are all projection, both towards him and that kid. "We get it, you love racists", "The kid is a white POS that fantasizes about genocide", "He wants to lynch blacks and latinos".

They're all projecting onto this kid especially. He didn't even say a goddamn thing in the video of the guy stealing his hat and throwing his drink on him. But these fucktards magically know he's a backwoods nigger hating Hitler incarnate piece of garbage. I can almost feel how absolutely assmad they are from here.
 
>That's not how slavery ended
>That's not how Civil Rights was established


Did this poster just forget MLK's message of nonviolence? How he specifically stated, "Hate cannot drive out hate"?
Hell, the civil rights movement had people like Frederick Douglass at the forefront, orating and debating those who saw blacks as less than human. Disproving all previously held stereotypes that racists back then had.

And this sackless fuckface actually wants to claim that they were brought about by using Antifa style violent hit-and-run tactics?

Fuck this site and its users. It can't even get history right.
Haven't some of the more hardcore SJW/BLM types dismissed MLK as an "Uncle Tom" or some shit?

Given how these people seem to act, I wouldn't be surprised if some REEEE users don't hold him in high regard...
 
Haven't some of the more hardcore SJW/BLM types dismissed MLK as an "Uncle Tom" or some shit?

Given how these people seem to act, I wouldn't be surprised if some REEEE users don't hold him in high regard...
Black supremacists tend to view Martin Luther King as a "coon" for being an integrationist and against violent methods. White guilt trippers and other low-fat mîlk SJWs are either hesitant to call him an Uncle Tom but claim he was too soft in his criticism/methods or try to equate his and his supporters' struggles/methods to those of the modern day BLM movement. What both groups have in common is that they tend to prefer Malcolm X (who once famously called King an "Uncle Tom").
 
Last edited:
Haven't some of the more hardcore SJW/BLM types dismissed MLK as an "Uncle Tom" or some shit?

Given how these people seem to act, I wouldn't be surprised if some REEEE users don't hold him in high regard...
In addition to what @ATaxingWoman said, when SJW/BLM types do endorse MLK, they typically use an excerpt from his Letter from Birmingham Jail where he expresses his frustration with white moderates who agree with the cause but not the methods. Ii's basically the bedrock of the "respectability politics is garbage" argument. If you see anyone posting about how moderates prefer a "negative peace" over on REE, that's what they're talking about. I imagine if Dr. King saw them now he'd regret writing that letter.
 
As I'm sure you are aware, ResetEra people are advocating for violence against teens who disagree with them politically here; https://www.resetera.com/threads/16...da-thrown-at-him-at-whataburger.53567/page-25
(It is about the 16 year old kid being attacked by some 30 year old)

Mods are fine with it as well. (no bans) Last page especially is filled with this rhetoric. I've attached an example of a modern civil rights movement here. The civil right to "assault teens I don't like," of course.
I just don't get how people can say stuff like that and not realize people could use the exact same argument against them. Oh, you believe violence is a good answer to hateful conduct? Oh good, me too, here, have a punch in the face for advocating violence shithead.

Furthermore, since they outright said they approve of violence as a political tool, does that mean if they tried to sue you afterward you could point out that they agreed to it, kinda like a boxing match?
 
Black supremacists tend to view Martin Luther King as a "coon" for being an integrationist and against violent methods. White guilt trippers and other low-fat mîlk SJWs are either hesitant to call him an Uncle Tom but claim he was too soft in his criticism/methods or try to equate his and his supporters' struggles/methods to those of the modern day BLM movement. What both groups have in common is that they tend to prefer Malcolm X (who once famously called King an "Uncle Tom").

Ironic, since even Malcom X came around to King's line of thinking later in life when he realized what actual Islam was and that the Nation of Islam was utter bullshit.
 
Does ResetEra have a system where they say which mod delivered a ban? If not, you could look at which mods are online when a ban is given and attribute it to one of them. The point I'm getting at is seeing which mods are the most ban-happy.

The mods are supposed to message the user who was banned with a more detailed reason and they usually do. The policy does not extend to permabans.

Also, unlike Facepunch where each mod handles their own bans, this forum has a system where any mod can randomly extend or meddle with any ban on a whim. You can find yourself banned by one mod and suddenly getting PMs from two of them.

The whole thing isn't standardized either so things that are "warnings" could actually just be bans by mods that hardly do anything or delayed bans.

As I'm sure you are aware, ResetEra people are advocating for violence against teens who disagree with them politically here; https://www.resetera.com/threads/16...da-thrown-at-him-at-whataburger.53567/page-25
(It is about the 16 year old kid being attacked by some 30 year old)

Mods are fine with it as well. (no bans) Last page especially is filled with this rhetoric. I've attached an example of a modern civil rights movement here. The civil right to "assault teens I don't like," of course.

Can violently assault Trump supporters but DON'T BE RACIST TO THEM.

...
 
Back