NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus

What I find interesting about the Tard Jungle of ResetERA is their implicit insistence that deplatforming "works."

They say this shit all the fucking time, yet they can never point to concrete reasons why. At best, they just parrot the fucking articles from Motherboard and friends, arguing that it's a net positive that some ass like Milo Yiannopolous or Alex Jones gets nuked because it "means less hate speech," when most with a sense of pattern recognition point out that going all out against them makes your own side look like it isn't able to take them on, justifies all your opposition's craziest conspiratorial shit, and makes you look like the bad guy. It gets proven over and over, yet they're convinced it works.
 
The fact that people are accused of "false equivalencies" and other "guide to fallacies" stuff for simply stating facts is scary.
This misuse of the notion of the logical fallacy really irks me, and only serves to make you look pseudo-intellectual and insufferable.

What I find interesting about the Tard Jungle of ResetERA is their implicit insistence that deplatforming "works."

They say this shit all the fucking time, yet they can never point to concrete reasons why. At best, they just parrot the fucking articles from Motherboard and friends, arguing that it's a net positive that some ass like Milo Yiannopolous or Alex Jones gets nuked because it "means less hate speech," when most with a sense of pattern recognition point out that going all out against them makes your own side look like it isn't able to take them on, justifies all your opposition's craziest conspiratorial shit, and makes you look like the bad guy. It gets proven over and over, yet they're convinced it works.
Deplatforming "works" in the sense of making it (marginally) harder to locate certain people on the world wide web, so less people find them, and they have less of an audience.
 
Deplatforming "works" in the sense of making it (marginally) harder to locate certain people on the world wide web, so less people find them, and they have less of an audience.

Maybe, but the people that do find them will be much more devoted to them (because the deplatforming proved them right when they claimed to be under siege by the establishment). And any terrible ideas the deplatformed have are less likely to be confronted with open debate within their insular supporter communities, and so any extreme views they promote will only fester and grow "in darkness."

As I think you were implying, deplatforming betrays a strange apparent belief that if you don't see something, it no longer exists. It also implies a profound authoritarian contempt for humanity: "you people are so dumb, you'll only come to the correct conclusions if you're fed only the right information." This is how you breed a silent majority of people united in their hatred of you.
 
What I find interesting about the Tard Jungle of ResetERA is their implicit insistence that deplatforming "works."

They say this shit all the fucking time, yet they can never point to concrete reasons why. At best, they just parrot the fucking articles from Motherboard and friends, arguing that it's a net positive that some ass like Milo Yiannopolous or Alex Jones gets nuked because it "means less hate speech," when most with a sense of pattern recognition point out that going all out against them makes your own side look like it isn't able to take them on, justifies all your opposition's craziest conspiratorial shit, and makes you look like the bad guy. It gets proven over and over, yet they're convinced it works.

And then they always miss the connection when a bunch of their own dudes are banned for doing the same kind of shit, and amazed, and simply have no idea how these things came to pass.
 
The beat way to debunk an argument or point of view, is to prove it wrong with clear and verifiable evidence to the contrary, or reasoned, well expressed, well thought out counter points.

Not spazzing out like a bunch of fucking imbeciles and screaming that the nasty people stop talking.

Shutting down peoples right to reply or right to express an opinion just reinforces everything they are saying, as in general, only fascist, authoritarian, anti liberty dictatorships do that kind of thing and thats exactly what the radical left is accused of trying to be.
 
Because it's not meant to be profitable it's intended to be propaganda. In the former Soviet Union they opened thousands of "Soviet Culture" museums that never made a profit and lost millions of dollars a year? Why because then the Soviet commissars could give every bum a job and claim that they had a 100% employed populace. It wasn't true but the optics were great at least for the short term.

This is the modern left's version of that.
:offtopic: nope
1. Public museums weren't supposed to be "profitable". The public / government / entrenched party bureaucrats owned everything, and they didn't need accounting tricks like demanding hundreds of roubles for a ticket to a public palace and then giving away extremely discounted tickets through unions and such.
Yes, maintaining palaces costs oceans of money, and it was a good thing that they were maintained on the people's dime and accessible to everyone, rather than maintained on the people's dime (again) but owned by the nobles, or left to rot and ruin.
Highbrow culture will never be profitable by itself, but longterm investment in it is how you win WWII and the fucking space race.

2. The early and midcentury Soviet mass culture was hugely popular (and insanely profitable) - the system started failing to cater to people's interests mid-70s but was still profitable for another decade naturally, without covert subsidies and accounting tricks. The censorship was no more invasive than the Hays code, though it worked off different principles and excluded whole genres (horror movies, being superstitious nonsense, and disaster movies, being imperialist smears against the Soviet industry - a lot like modern China). The "oppressed" creative types Western libs love to whine about were subhuman trash the likes of Daniil Kharms (cue twitter fuckwits: "can you imagine it? they starved a *~children's writer~* to death! monsters!!!") - in truth, he was more islamic than the whole Animal Control subforum, publicly announced his intent to fight for the Nazis, got locked up in the madhouse for that and died there of hunger during the Siege of Leningrad.

3. Bum employment had nothing to do with propaganda. The perpetually booming Soviet industrial economy never had a job crisis, white-collar jobs were a privilege, and no bum could hope for anything other than hard labor on either side of the razor wire. And while the actual Soviet Union had massively privileged professional artists (e.g. the celebrity pair Magomayev and Sinyavskaya, who lived like royalty), the ideal artist, according to media portrayal, was an amateur who had a practical day job and performed in their spare time.

Advocating doxing conservative journalists = warning, upgraded to 1 day ban
Pointing out anti-competitive and abusive corporate practices = 1 week ban
https://www.resetera.com/threads/fo...banned-from-using-paypal.79965/#post-14783112 (https://archive.fo/3KTMY)
View attachment 588726
Lel. Paypal is Peter Thiel, a literal hedge vulture ICE nazi vampire. There's no single person on Earth who should be more hated by the left (or "left") than him. But libs gonna lib.
 
The beat way to debunk an argument or point of view, is to prove it wrong with clear and verifiable evidence to the contrary, or reasoned, well expressed, well thought out counter points.

Not spazzing out like a bunch of fucking imbeciles and screaming that the nasty people stop talking.

Shutting down peoples right to reply or right to express an opinion just reinforces everything they are saying, as in general, only fascist, authoritarian, anti liberty dictatorships do that kind of thing and thats exactly what the radical left is accused of trying to be.

The problem with doing this is that required self aware and knowing that maybe you will agree with some parts and disagree with other, but in the end he is another person, maybe with shitty opinion but, who cares ?
Those fucker are incapable to do that because they're afraid that maybe not all thing they believe are right (they're in the right side of the history!) so is better to ree at other.
 
Advocating doxing conservative journalists = warning, upgraded to 1 day ban
Pointing out anti-competitive and abusive corporate practices = 1 week ban
https://www.resetera.com/threads/fo...banned-from-using-paypal.79965/#post-14783112 (https://archive.fo/3KTMY)
View attachment 588726
View attachment 588728
http://www.paypalsucks.com/
View attachment 588729
View attachment 588731
I wonder how ResetEra would react if they knew PayPal was banning Antifa. https://archive.fo/PEv8y
upload_2018-11-10_12-14-10.png

https://twitter.com/afainatl/status/1061027466767142912/ (https://archive.fo/xjON3)
DrmG0RIXQAE8Z9R.jpg:large.jpeg
 

Whenever I see cisgender people put their pronouns in their profile, I wonder what the actual motivation is. It's not as if they have any risk of being misgendered, so is it just to make their nonbinary friends feel comfortable?

I thought the point of conventional gender presentation was to clearly identify as one that broad society can recognize and understand, but it seems like Twitter people have conditioned themselves to frontload that information in text in lieu of any context clues.
 
Paypal doesn't really have a choice. As of the Tucker Carlson incident ANTIFA has progressed to committing borderline home invasions opening up Paypal to massive civil and criminal liability if they continue to fund them. If ANTIFA continues to escalate their tactics they could be subject to RICO as well and there's no way in hell Paypal or any other payment processor wants to get caught up in that.
 
The beat way to debunk an argument or point of view, is to prove it wrong with clear and verifiable evidence to the contrary, or reasoned, well expressed, well thought out counter points.

That's if you're actually right, though.

Paypal doesn't really have a choice. As of the Tucker Carlson incident ANTIFA has progressed to committing borderline home invasions opening up Paypal to massive civil and criminal liability if they continue to fund them.

Nobody has tested § 230 yet to see if it protects profiting from literal terrorism, and I suspect such a test wouldn't go well.
 
Last edited:
The Alastair dude seems legit but the black tranny immigrant arab muslim seems like a tailor made troll account. Between the language it's using and, if you look at the side, what appears to be spamming the XKCD anti free speech "we're showing you the door" comic, it's like the perfect concoction of someone weaponizing identity politics.
Also that profile picture is the first google result for "black woman silhouette". And it's named freaking Sam Barlow, what?
 
Last edited:
The Alastair dude seems legit but the black tranny immigrant arab muslim seems like a tailor made troll account. Between the language it's using and, if you look at the side, what appears to be spamming the XKCD anti free speech "we're showing you the door" comic, it's like the perfect concoction of someone weaponizing identity politics.
Also that profile picture is the first google result for "black woman silhouette".
Quite possible. Poe's law is rampant throughout this whole thread. You could claim most people who are heavily featured in this thread are actually Poe's law trolls, as I had previously done, and apparently some had even taken seriously. http://www.thebore.com/forum/index.php?topic=45505.msg2478449#msg2478449 (https://archive.fo/OF6TA)
upload_2018-11-10_15-6-33.png
upload_2018-11-10_15-10-11.png

I'm seriously coming to the conclusion that DigitalOp is a teenager, or just a severely immature man-child. I'm not screencapping this giant fucking post. https://www.resetera.com/threads/fa...-black-woman-hero.80148/page-11#post-14827819 (https://archive.fo/gR5dg)
upload_2018-11-10_15-28-32.png

@cwistofu
@Benita
@Chindogg
@Hollywood Pescado
@EkStatiC
@Aztec Complex
@Francesco


Take a look at this list.

Yesterday, Not even a day passed
, they were all in my thread shitposting, downplaying, and gas lighting about the topic at hand.

What is the common denominator between this thread and mine? It deals with concerns coming from a Black perspective. This is fucking ridiculous and its pretty much come to a head.

Clearly someone felt their comments were out of line to ban them but once again ERA can't commit to making a better site than what else is available on the web. These posters see the word 'Black' and come running to stir shit, and time and time again, moderation gives them a few days timeout. They come right back to board and continue the same shit.

Look at how many people you banned in this thread, You think their gonna change? You think they'll be more receptive next time? That ban taught em a good lesson?

Is this how you all want to run the site? Is the standard white male gamer perspective the default that needs to be protected?

We had an embarrassing thread with WomenERA being bombarded with male posters completely ignoring their views. That's okay here on ERA too?


Its pretty damn disappointing. How are black moderators suppose to feel about this like @Nepenthe and @Slayven? Im sure they are well aware of these clowns who constantly stir shit and have to see them come back time and time again and make this board even shittier for everyone.

Im speaking for myself, but I know I aint alone in this thought. Posters are tired of this crap. Take out the fucking trash for once. It smells. It reeks in here.

You want to send me a notification about ERA 2.0 and goddamn emojis but you can't even commit to making a board with friendlier discourse between diverse people.

Its embarrassing, it truly is. What is the gameplan? What is the plan of action? Ignore it? Thats how we got here. You ignored action and now the board is astroturfed with alts and people taking the piss out of the community. Its all a fucking joke for them.


No, Im not going to PM you. Im going to post publicly so people can see wtf is going on and what we can expect as a response.

@Cerium and @SweetNicole

Ball is in your court. Ready to play?

PS: A perm for me and Racism getting 3 days proves my point.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/th...he-new-kryptonite.74863/page-52#post-14828630 (https://archive.fo/keUPE)
upload_2018-11-10_15-26-18.png

upload_2018-11-10_15-27-36.png


No ban for special protected mod pets, just close the thread as damage control.
 
Last edited:
I'm betting on the latter with the addition of a strong case of "feeling disconnected from being black because he grew up either middle class or above in a suburb". There's no other explanation for the incessant use of AAVE, assuming he's actually black.
 
Back