NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
1 month for this post is pretty funny, especially after they banned a guy for 5 days for doxing: https://resetera.com/posts/15349146/ (https://archive.is/5oJ1J)
upload_2018-11-25_13-57-25.png


I didn't realize that ResetEra was such a libertarian forum.
 
For a long time now I've been a little miffed by that same kind of subtle sexualisation in practice with Rainbow Six: Siege's character designs and I've harped about it in the OT from time to time to some others' distress, probably. If you look at the vanilla characters, they're all more armored and their faces are concealed. Almost every female DLC character has foregone a mask or other protective headwear when anonymity is extremely important in the special operations groups these characters belong to. In addition often female DLC characters completely forego bulletproof vests, which isn't excused by their light armor gameplay rating, because many characters with a light armor rating wear vests. All the male ones do, in fact.

Here are pics of obvious examples that hopefully make what I'm talking about clear.

Vanilla:

EVWKPIi.jpg


DLC:

Grvpu9v.jpg


Technically, the face thing applies kind of to every character because vanilla Siege had pretty primitive facial animation. Since it's been upgraded DLC character designs have much more often been without concealing headwear, but that aside, there is a trend of female characters foregoing concealing headwear alongside the male counterparts of their DLC pack who come with them wearing masks i.e. Dokkaebi & Vigil, Finka & Lion.

They've also gone back to vanilla and old DLC characters to make them more attractive. The first character used as an example above, Twitch, has been wholly redesigned.

GtX8cbw.jpg


Note the slightly thinner, tighter, brighter appearance.

poIJZeo.jpg


Valkyrie's old face was complained about and memed on enough for them to redo it. Solemnly tell me that's a bad face model. It isn't. It's not an attractive face by typical standards; I don't find it extremely attractive. It's a strong face. But it isn't a bad face model. C'mon. Therein lies the issue—these characters are the highest level combat forces operatives, attractiveness isn't really a requirement. Not that they can't be pretty, but pretty is all people out there want and all creators out there give. And how important is pretty for Siege? A game ostensibly about soldiers tactically destroying and killing in a semi-grounded setting. That isn't a pretty thing by most standards, is it?

http://archive.is/c7SSR#selection-6167.0-6167.6
 
For a long time now I've been a little miffed by that same kind of subtle sexualisation in practice with Rainbow Six: Siege's character designs and I've harped about it in the OT from time to time to some others' distress, probably. If you look at the vanilla characters, they're all more armored and their faces are concealed. Almost every female DLC character has foregone a mask or other protective headwear when anonymity is extremely important in the special operations groups these characters belong to. In addition often female DLC characters completely forego bulletproof vests, which isn't excused by their light armor gameplay rating, because many characters with a light armor rating wear vests. All the male ones do, in fact.

Here are pics of obvious examples that hopefully make what I'm talking about clear.

Vanilla:

EVWKPIi.jpg


DLC:

Grvpu9v.jpg


Technically, the face thing applies kind of to every character because vanilla Siege had pretty primitive facial animation. Since it's been upgraded DLC character designs have much more often been without concealing headwear, but that aside, there is a trend of female characters foregoing concealing headwear alongside the male counterparts of their DLC pack who come with them wearing masks i.e. Dokkaebi & Vigil, Finka & Lion.

They've also gone back to vanilla and old DLC characters to make them more attractive. The first character used as an example above, Twitch, has been wholly redesigned.

GtX8cbw.jpg


Note the slightly thinner, tighter, brighter appearance.

poIJZeo.jpg


Valkyrie's old face was complained about and memed on enough for them to redo it. Solemnly tell me that's a bad face model. It isn't. It's not an attractive face by typical standards; I don't find it extremely attractive. It's a strong face. But it isn't a bad face model. C'mon. Therein lies the issue—these characters are the highest level combat forces operatives, attractiveness isn't really a requirement. Not that they can't be pretty, but pretty is all people out there want and all creators out there give. And how important is pretty for Siege? A game ostensibly about soldiers tactically destroying and killing in a semi-grounded setting. That isn't a pretty thing by most standards, is it?

http://archive.is/c7SSR#selection-6167.0-6167.6
Even some of the original operator showed their faces, all the FBI ones for example to include Ash. I think a lot of it is that body armor and a ski mask kind of limit character designs, especially in a game where being able to recognize who you're fighting is a key component.

And honestly Valkyrie can look like a supermodel and it still won't make a female Navy SEAL any more unrealistic and that ignore all the sci fi shit they've added recently.
 
Last edited:
I wondered why #thotaudit was appearing everywhere. Now I know.

Not to beat a dead horse, but what is ResetEra's problem with sex? They want games banned if they show too much cleavage, and while they've not mentioned them directly they seem to be on the side that hates Booth Babes, Grid Girls, and Super Models, but a woman shakes her tits on snapchat and suddenly they are breaking out the big guns in her defence.


What hate movement? ResetEra has blamed everyone except the pope at this point.
 
what is ResetEra's problem with sex?

They're perma virgin shut ins who's only contact with "women" is sex negative feminists and troons on Twitter so they genuinely think women hate and fear sex. Because of this they pretend they think tits are gross in order to suck up to them hoping to get their dicks wet. Naturally to us normal folks this all seems incredibly strange but whatever.

It's kind of similar to incel logic now that I think about it which is amusing given how much they hate incels.
 
Now, a rhetorical question:

Why the fuck does ResetEra have a problem with someone getting audited?

They only have a problem when its the wrong person being audited. Because oppressed uwu sex worker beans, just like ethnic minorities and people who claim to be trans, shouldn't have any rules applied to them. Because even treatment under the law is wrong, and these groups need to be able to get away with evertything.

#Thotaudit is fucking hysterical and the amount of salt being generated over it is amazing. It's probably the only funny thing incels have ever or will ever do but it's a good one.

There was the Virgin v Chad meme they started, that ended up pretty funny.
 
They're perma virgin shut ins who's only contact with "women" is sex negative feminists and troons on Twitter so they genuinely think women hate and fear sex. Because of this they pretend they think tits are gross in order to suck up to them hoping to get their dicks wet. Naturally to us normal folks this all seems incredibly strange but whatever.

It's kind of similar to incel logic now that I think about it which is amusing given how much they hate incels.

They are incels who hate other incels. It’s simultaneously hilarious and pathetic.
 
Is this "yevgeniya" the thot in question? Gosh, SHE IS FAT!
can't be, she's a leaf
"can't be the target of the IRS," I should specify. She can be fat, and in fact is.

I don't dox mexicans because I'm not an upper class white hipster who punches down on oppressed minorities for failing to live up to my privileged standards.
You can't dox mexicans because they're all named "hay-soos" or maria & never have permanent mailing addresses. What would even be the point, to get them fired from their current orange grove or asphalting comission?
 
Last edited:
For a long time now I've been a little miffed by that same kind of subtle sexualisation in practice with Rainbow Six: Siege's character designs and I've harped about it in the OT from time to time to some others' distress, probably. If you look at the vanilla characters, they're all more armored and their faces are concealed. Almost every female DLC character has foregone a mask or other protective headwear when anonymity is extremely important in the special operations groups these characters belong to. In addition often female DLC characters completely forego bulletproof vests, which isn't excused by their light armor gameplay rating, because many characters with a light armor rating wear vests. All the male ones do, in fact.

Here are pics of obvious examples that hopefully make what I'm talking about clear.

Vanilla:

EVWKPIi.jpg


DLC:

Grvpu9v.jpg


Technically, the face thing applies kind of to every character because vanilla Siege had pretty primitive facial animation. Since it's been upgraded DLC character designs have much more often been without concealing headwear, but that aside, there is a trend of female characters foregoing concealing headwear alongside the male counterparts of their DLC pack who come with them wearing masks i.e. Dokkaebi & Vigil, Finka & Lion.

They've also gone back to vanilla and old DLC characters to make them more attractive. The first character used as an example above, Twitch, has been wholly redesigned.

GtX8cbw.jpg


Note the slightly thinner, tighter, brighter appearance.

poIJZeo.jpg


Valkyrie's old face was complained about and memed on enough for them to redo it. Solemnly tell me that's a bad face model. It isn't. It's not an attractive face by typical standards; I don't find it extremely attractive. It's a strong face. But it isn't a bad face model. C'mon. Therein lies the issue—these characters are the highest level combat forces operatives, attractiveness isn't really a requirement. Not that they can't be pretty, but pretty is all people out there want and all creators out there give. And how important is pretty for Siege? A game ostensibly about soldiers tactically destroying and killing in a semi-grounded setting. That isn't a pretty thing by most standards, is it?

http://archive.is/c7SSR#selection-6167.0-6167.6
Charging extra to sex up a game is a pretty good business model though.
 
Back