NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus

Whenever I look, most of that thread always seems like totally dudes; as in listed their gender as "Male" on their account. They like to go there and bitch about how other threads aren't upset enough about the newest "hypersexualized" ladies. Which can mean anything from the Dead or Alive games to a woman exposing her "femoral artery" carelessly.

Like these are all self-proclaimed "male":
View attachment 691432
View attachment 691431
View attachment 691430

These "men" just need to troon out or at the very least come out of the closet. It's okay to be gay, dudes.
 
Whenever I look, most of that thread always seems like totally dudes; as in listed their gender as "Male" on their account. They like to go there and bitch about how other threads aren't upset enough about the newest "hypersexualized" ladies. Which can mean anything from the Dead or Alive games to a woman exposing her "femoral artery" carelessly.

Like these are all self-proclaimed "male":
View attachment 691432
View attachment 691431
View attachment 691430

Note to REEseters: The majority of gamers are straight men. Straight men like to look at female tits & asses. Therefore, gaming companies put in female characters with huge, juicy ta-tas and big bouncing booties to boost sales. This is not rocket surgery.
 
Whenever I look, most of that thread always seems like totally dudes; as in listed their gender as "Male" on their account. They like to go there and bitch about how other threads aren't upset enough about the newest "hypersexualized" ladies. Which can mean anything from the Dead or Alive games to a woman exposing her "femoral artery" carelessly.

Like these are all self-proclaimed "male":
View attachment 691432
View attachment 691431
View attachment 691430
For some reason these idiots are under the impression that sexualization only means "wearing skimpy, effeminate outfits", an incredibly two dimensional way of thinking. The man in that picture looks absurd because it's completely out of the norm for how we perceive a sexy male. Male sexualization DOES happen. It happens a lot and takes a completely different form; with men who have hyper unrealistic muscle mass, bare chests, idealized height, idealized social status, etc. These people are completely blind.

EDIT: Ninja'd by @DanteAlighieri o well
 
Last edited:
Note to REEseters: The majority of gamers are straight men. Straight men like to look at female tits & asses. Therefore, gaming companies put in female characters with huge, juicy ta-tas and big bouncing booties to boost sales. This is not rocket surgery.

The men who are putting on this performative display of "ewwwww gross she's all naked and shit" are either gay or are straight men who are fooling nobody and like that shit just as much as everyone else and only pretend they don't to impress similarly pathetic betas.
 
These "men" just need to troon out or at the very least come out of the closet. It's okay to be gay, dudes.

I wish it were as simple as them being gay. But I think it more comes from how society on the left is being taught that straight male desire is inherently wrong. A man desiring a woman, wanting to find her sexy - that's gross MRA stuff that leads to rape culture. It's been pointed out before, but SJW culture is a very puritan culture that pretends to be sex-positive but really isn't. It's trying to be a bit more turnabout is fair play - women ogling men is OK now while men are shamed for doing so - but at the end of the day it really does come down pretty heavily against sex in general, straight sex in particular.

So they complain and attack all these things, and these men learn that their desires are wrong and bad. So if they find a woman in a game sexy, that means there's something wrong with her being that way, because they're meant to be good people who respect women. They get in trouble, or have seen men get in trouble, for merely describing a female character as attractive, for talking to a woman in a bar, for even looking at a woman in a way that made her uncomfortable.

So I think some of it is virtue-signalling, the whole 'ma'am may I please have some coochie?' sentiment where if they show how good they are maybe these women will deign to treat them well. And I think some of it is the product of men trying to do the right thing, not realising the right thing is being changed constantly so they'll likely not keep up, nor are they meant to.

And some of it - well, some of it is what leads to secret porn addictions and male feminists being accused of abuse and all the rest of it. Because their desires are bad and wrong and shameful and private, and repressing that in the era of the internet seems to make people fucked up in different ways than it used to.
 
And Terry Crews has just failed their purity test and is a horrible horrible person now and should be unpersoned. And that all for saying something that is not really that controversial, namely that generally it is better for a child to have both a father and a mother


https://www.resetera.com/threads/terry-crews-criticised-for-saying-children-of-same-sex-parents-are-‘severely-malnourished’.103227/
It's more frustrating when his comments are so far out of context that I'm actually really amazed at the effort by people smearing him.

Terry was writing a response about an article about black families and the involvement and impact of father figures, or the lack thereof, either through abandonment or toxic behavior. His comment was literally telling other black men (HIGHLIGHTED FOR EMPHASIS) to be an inspirational figure to ensure their offspring lead healthier lives, for sons to set the standard of how they should behave, and for daughters to ensure that they know what are desirable and healthy traits in partners there's no way I can write that without making it sound incesty but you can probably get my point. The pathways that open without a healthy parental upbringing can often be bleak, and if you feel like you've been missing a strong patriarch in your family, it doesnt seem too irrational at that moment to try and find someone to fill in their place. It's just that unfortunately not everyone has an Uncle Phil in bel-air to fall back on and risk choosing someone a unhealthy to their wellbeing.

Granted the example I gave there is race-neutral, but it's a super harsh truth, and you don't get people like Chris any other way. It is a pretty good take once you break it down, all in all.

...Then cue the rose emoji resistance crowd saying this response, to a black issue thats so long standing its a stereotype, is Xphobic.

I do think he shot himself in the foot by using twitter to debate because his response was really badly phrased. It's not exactly hard to get what he was saying in response though, that if someone is going to go out of their way to conceive you then they should at least also be committed to raise you, but hindsight is 20/20 I guess.
 
Last edited:
I wish it were as simple as them being gay. But I think it more comes from how society on the left is being taught that straight male desire is inherently wrong. A man desiring a woman, wanting to find her sexy - that's gross MRA stuff that leads to rape culture. It's been pointed out before, but SJW culture is a very puritan culture that pretends to be sex-positive but really isn't. It's trying to be a bit more turnabout is fair play - women ogling men is OK now while men are shamed for doing so - but at the end of the day it really does come down pretty heavily against sex in general, straight sex in particular.

So they complain and attack all these things, and these men learn that their desires are wrong and bad. So if they find a woman in a game sexy, that means there's something wrong with her being that way, because they're meant to be good people who respect women. They get in trouble, or have seen men get in trouble, for merely describing a female character as attractive, for talking to a woman in a bar, for even looking at a woman in a way that made her uncomfortable.

So I think some of it is virtue-signalling, the whole 'ma'am may I please have some coochie?' sentiment where if they show how good they are maybe these women will deign to treat them well. And I think some of it is the product of men trying to do the right thing, not realising the right thing is being changed constantly so they'll likely not keep up, nor are they meant to.

And some of it - well, some of it is what leads to secret porn addictions and male feminists being accused of abuse and all the rest of it. Because their desires are bad and wrong and shameful and private, and repressing that in the era of the internet seems to make people fucked up in different ways than it used to.

As we have seen with "male feminists", there is another possibility: there are guys who are obviously perverts, sex pests, and rapists that know that it's wrong, so they go to extremes to hide/make up for it by adopting this "Men looking at women BAD! Women looking at men GOOD!" worldview. This crowd sort of overlaps with the men who do this in hopes of getting access to pussy for being GOOD ALLIES, with the exception that they don't take "NO!" for an answer.
 
There are no women on ResetEra. It's all troons with gender dysphoria who get triggered by the sight of passable women in video games. This strain of puritanism has nothing to do with protecting females from lewd content.

It's the mods who are 100% deeply mentally ill troons, rapists, etc. There are some normal people among the users who somehow think they're actually on a games forum.
 
There are no women on ResetEra. It's all troons with gender dysphoria who get triggered by the sight of passable women in video games. This strain of puritanism has nothing to do with protecting females from lewd content.

You're suggesting there are no women on resetERA, but looking at the posts there are clearly no men.

Who's posting then? Domesticated animals?
 

691857


691855


This is bizarro Resetera.
 
Resetera is mad that in the new Devil May Cry Dante does a Michael Jackson dance

Capcom please remove the moonwalk dance that has been referenced in everything ever. I know people have known that Michael Jackson was a pedo for decades, but two men cried on TV about it so now we care
A fun thing to do would be to make the same exact thread only complaining about his appearance in Yakuza 0 (which a couple posters did mention) instead and then using the same train of logic as in the THQ AMA thread to accuse anyone with the 'Yakuza fan' banners in their avi of endorsing child abuse.

View attachment 691969

Don't worry comrade the thread shall be cleansed soon enough
Best part is that that's the second time he's done it (Page 4).
 
They're not even allowed to discuss the incredible nuance surrounding Michael Jackson. He was a man groomed from birth to be the king of pop. His childhood consisted of highly ordered and controlled days, no Disneyland, no shopping, just singing and being a star.

We have Corey Feldman and Macaulay Culkin testifying they were never molested.

There's the weird events where MJ went "shopping" with actors at a mall and a grocery.

What if he was trying to have the childhood he never had? There's a huge discussion that should be had around this, as I've barely even broken the skin.

Oh, learn to separate the artist from the art. Easier to stay sane that way.
 
Back