NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) - Files as crypto currency

It took NFTs for this guy to realize you don't need to plaster your real face or name on every social media platform you join.
This is what I mean when I say I hate Silicon Valley. Techbros are gentrifying the concept of internet anonymity and turning it into a wealth based status symbol. I hate these people.
Are there any patterns among sneaker hoarders? Perhaps an ethnic or cultural component?
Beanie babies, Star Wars action figures, authentic film props, paintings by old dead white guys. Same concept. These things only have (or used to have) value because we're told they do, or people give them some value.
 
Got another bit of NFT cringe, looks like bronies have discovered NFTs:
1636950569300.png

1636950591988.png


1636950613387.png


1636950385358.png


Imagine almost spending $500 to buy some Pony Creator looking abomination.
 
Well, why is gold valuable? Because everyone thinks it's valuable - it's the same thing. We could crash governments and financial markets across the world if we somehow got everyone in the world around the market to decide that gold shouldn't be worth more than a penny a gram and refuse to buy it for anything more.
Not really, usually the value of something depends on many factors such as quantity, availability, demand, etc. So if you have something in high demand, for whatever reason, but in low quantity, the price sky rockets, but if you have something in low demand and high quantity, well you get the point. Even if we stopped trading in gold and stop giving it the luxury treatment, there are components that do need the gold in order to function properly, so the demand would be low but due to the low availability of gold compared to other metals, the price would still be a bit expensive in comparison.
I do agree we can set any stupid high value to something arbitrarily but making it cheaper is a bit more difficult just because of the usage of the material alone.
That's a good question. I know more about the tech than I do the legalities and culture around this stuff. I'm sure it's inevitable a case involving an NFT contract goes to court at some point, and whether the court decides it's a valid contract or not might be something we can't know until it happens - and it's also quite likely different jurisdictions will have wildly different decisions. But the libertarians that tend to be most into this crypto stuff don't have much regard for government institutions in the first place…
Most countries dealing with any type of digital commerce, heck even just having access to Paypal, already covered this issue. In most countries they recognise the trade of goods in a digital platform as a contract that has to be upheld by both parties, the contract can be a simple agreement or something more official, but the point is, they do consider the digital goods as a product or service that holds some sort of value, this is where every country varies a bit and decide to argue how that value is calculated but in general they legally recognise that a transaction took place where one individual exchange something for something else, so the moment you pay for the NFT and the tard that sold that shit to you made it very clear what you were going to get from it, you MUST get that exact shit, but if you are even dumber than the tard and not understood exactly what you were paying for, then the court will laugh at your stupid face and dismiss the case. This last part is exactly why many scammers are pushing the NFTs so hard, because it's super easy to get away with it because they are literally selling something worthless that most people don't even understand what it even means.
 
Now I understand why scummy video game companies are suddenly heralding NFTs as some new era of gaming. They've cut out and monetized the everloving fuck out of everything they could without players revolting, now they're going to start monetizing fake shit and selling that.

EDIT: Well, no, they're going to monetize fake ownership of something that they own anyway that you can't do anything with and anyone can take. I hate Silicon Valley so much,.
Let me make a summary between videogames and NFTs as of late.

October 15, 2021: Steam bans NFT videogames from the Steam storefront. Epic Games' Store on the other hand wishes to keep NFTs in their storefront.

October 20, 2021: Behaviour Interactive, developers of Dead by Daylight issues a Pinhead NFT from the Hellraiser collaboration.

November 1, 2021: Ubisoft plans on incorporating NFTs to its future games.

November 11, 2021: /r/Cookierun players are outraged after Devsisters, the devs of the game, wishes to implement NFTs in the future.

Do inform me if there are others I miss.

Also, cryptocurrency and NFTs are gay and you should feel bad for being a part of it.
 
This is what I mean when I say I hate Silicon Valley. Techbros are gentrifying the concept of internet anonymity and turning it into a wealth based status symbol. I hate these people.

Beanie babies, Star Wars action figures, authentic film props, paintings by old dead white guys. Same concept. These things only have (or used to have) value because we're told they do, or people give them some value.
Consoomerism is an emotional crutch for people who are socially and culturally diseased. No normal person thinks those will ever be worth anything, as evidenced by millions of sensible moms throwing out their sons comic book collections.
 
Behaviour Interactive, developers of Dead by Daylight issues a Pinhead NFT from the Hellraiser collaboration.
My understanding of the situation is that in order to add Pinhead to the game, this is something that Behaviour had to agree to do. It's not Behaviour themselves, it's another company called Boss Protocol (that is in of itself pretty sketchy) that has the NFT rights to Pinhead or something. A lot of it is conjecture, Behaviour has been extremely tight lipped about Pinhead and other legal things because Netflix pulled their Stranger Things license recently.

Like Pinhead initially came with voice lines, but then when he was pushed to the live servers he was suddenly silent. Behaviour initially cited an "unknown technical issue" but later admitted that it was some legal thing they weren't allowed to talk about.
 
My understanding of the situation is that in order to add Pinhead to the game, this is something that Behaviour had to agree to do. It's not Behaviour themselves, it's another company called Boss Protocol (that is in of itself pretty sketchy) that has the NFT rights to Pinhead or something. A lot of it is conjecture, Behaviour has been extremely tight lipped about Pinhead and other legal things because Netflix pulled their Stranger Things license recently.

Like Pinhead initially came with voice lines, but then when he was pushed to the live servers he was suddenly silent. Behaviour initially cited an "unknown technical issue" but later admitted that it was some legal thing they weren't allowed to talk about.
That is fucking amazing and perfectly in line with all the stupid horror movie IP slapfights that have happened over the years.
 
NFTs are a bright shining turd on the internet, currently in cook group where people run checkout bots for this shit, like they will have a monitor set up so they can scoop up 1000 "Bored Dildos" each then jack up the price on "Bored Dildos". The biggest hit for NFTs, I'd say ever, was NBA Top Shots, which was a complete joke of a project. You can't move your "Moments" (clips of a game) to a separate wallet, so you can't sell anywhere other than their shitty marketplace. These things went for like $10k+ each for the 1/50 dumbo rare Lebron superjam or whatever, but any pack you buy would have Moments that are worth more than the pack itself. It was EZ money, just open a separate screen, like a phone or smth, and buy packs each time they dropped. Open the packs, sell all of the moments immediately, and make out like a bandit. Right now tho, I'd say it isn't worth it.

As for NFTs having zero use case, I could see NFTs being used for something like skins in CS:GO, a overarching replacement to the Steam marketplace that can be compatible with multiple different services. What if you could directly trade Fortnite skins for CS:GO knives, or maybe if you could trade stuff from Tarkov for WoW gear? Facilitating this as NFTs would make sense, getting devs onboard would be the hard part, but I can see something like this happening in the near future.
 
NFTs are a bright shining turd on the internet, currently in cook group where people run checkout bots for this shit, like they will have a monitor set up so they can scoop up 1000 "Bored Dildos" each then jack up the price on "Bored Dildos". The biggest hit for NFTs, I'd say ever, was NBA Top Shots, which was a complete joke of a project. You can't move your "Moments" (clips of a game) to a separate wallet, so you can't sell anywhere other than their shitty marketplace. These things went for like $10k+ each for the 1/50 dumbo rare Lebron superjam or whatever, but any pack you buy would have Moments that are worth more than the pack itself. It was EZ money, just open a separate screen, like a phone or smth, and buy packs each time they dropped. Open the packs, sell all of the moments immediately, and make out like a bandit. Right now tho, I'd say it isn't worth it.

As for NFTs having zero use case, I could see NFTs being used for something like skins in CS:GO, a overarching replacement to the Steam marketplace that can be compatible with multiple different services. What if you could directly trade Fortnite skins for CS:GO knives, or maybe if you could trade stuff from Tarkov for WoW gear? Facilitating this as NFTs would make sense, getting devs onboard would be the hard part, but I can see something like this happening in the near future.
Imagine using videogames, a medium meant for entertainment, as a job.
 
Let me make a summary between videogames and NFTs as of late.
I'm really curious as to what these game companies see in the NFT concept because I can't make sense of how they'd improve (from either their perspective or gamers') their games with it. They could release NFTs of artwork of their characters or something, sure, but that's not really integrating with games themselves. They could use them to represent in-game items for their games, but why would they need NFTs and blockchain tech for that? They run the game's servers, so they already have databases in place for that stuff, and an entirely internal database is both faster and more controllable than blockchains. If it's about allowing users to trade items amongst themselves. that's also something easily done with their own databases, and that will also help make sure they can get a cut of each sale, over and over again… (Possible with NFTs too but still easier and faster with a normal database.)

Maybe they have some really fascinating stuff planned for this tech, I don't know. Maybe they're just buying into it for the buzz and nothing will ultimately come of it. I guess we'll see.
 
I'm really curious as to what these game companies see in the NFT concept because I can't make sense of how they'd improve (from either their perspective or gamers') their games with it. They could release NFTs of artwork of their characters or something, sure, but that's not really integrating with games themselves. They could use them to represent in-game items for their games, but why would they need NFTs and blockchain tech for that? They run the game's servers, so they already have databases in place for that stuff, and an entirely internal database is both faster and more controllable than blockchains. If it's about allowing users to trade items amongst themselves. that's also something easily done with their own databases, and that will also help make sure they can get a cut of each sale, over and over again… (Possible with NFTs too but still easier and faster with a normal database.)

Maybe they have some really fascinating stuff planned for this tech, I don't know. Maybe they're just buying into it for the buzz and nothing will ultimately come of it. I guess we'll see.
Personally it just confirms my conspiracy theory that media companies personally hate us and want to suck our blood in the most inhumane ways physically possible as some sort of humiliation ritual.
By 2030 I'm pretty sure that all non indie games will have some form of legallized child gambling in them. That's not even some sort of prediction, most already do.
 
This is the best post I've seen yet that perfectly illustrates how useless NFTs are, all without screeching about environmentalism or whatever. The "EVERY NFT MINTED BURNS DOWN A FOREST" twitter posts never actually tell you exactly why NFTs are useless, or what makes an NFT "burning down a forest" somehow different from the environmental impact of, say, all the infrastructure needed to run the internet; they just cry and scream and appeal to emotion like all their other arguments do.
 
Last edited:
Back