Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 71 10.7%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 94 14.2%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 208 31.4%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 174 26.2%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 65 9.8%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.7%

  • Total voters
    663
How many 5k locals people are in here?
Nick might like a class action lawsuit to distract him from August 1st & Monty's case.
It seems silly for anybody to sue Rekieta over what is almost certainly gonna be a cheap chotsky.

It's cheaper and funnier to just laugh at the idiots that are still convinced they're ever getting the damn thing.

One of the funniest things I've seen from Nick's Locals is that when he blamed having to deal with Monty for not getting the gift out, some of the people in there wanted to sue Monty.
 
Last edited:
I can assure you, they’re either being isolated from others or having any other interactions highly monitored. Especially now.
This. Perhaps I am wrong, but I am sensing an attitude of “The kids have a solid network so they’re protected now” in some comments. Regardless of how many adults and kids they have contact with outside the home on a regular basis, it is misguided to take any comfort in that fact. Especially after the trauma and upheaval of last year’s drama, there will be a heightened disinclination to take the kids down that road again. Many people will talk themselves and others out of believing what they’ve seen with their own eyes in order to avoid “causing trouble.” It seems the Slettas are the only family members who can be relied upon to look out for the kids. Everyone else in their wider network will likely be much more reticent to make waves.

@John Andrews Stan Has your friend’s parents finally come to their senses about the damage they did? Or is it still denial, denial, denial?
My friend and her sister are extremely close to one another, in part because of what they suffered and survived together. Both believe their parents would feel an undeserved amount of guilt for their respective rapes (and other issues) if they connected those dots for them. Their attitude is that the past can’t be changed and that their parents were just way too influenced by their own nightmarish upbringings and the whole ‘60s/‘70s bullshit they were indoctrinated with as teens. (For example, their mom had been shamed a lot for her weight as an adolescent and wanted her daughters to feel comfortable in their bodies, which she had come to feel via her “free love” experiences that included a lot of nudity around their father and their hippie friends.) The sisters are both exceptionally mature emotionally, thanks to years of work on themselves, and neither feels any need for apologies in order to forgive their parents. (They are both church-going Christians FWIW.) Their parents are otherwise wonderful people who got it wrong on that matter, knowledge of which does not require the sisters to minimize what happened. It was damaging. The consequences were horrific. But as the saying goes, “The past is a foreign country. People do things differently there.”
 
They have a lot of community support. With a little digging, you can uncover dozens and dozens of pics of Matt Christensen (newly minted Head Pastor, then Youth Pastor) and Pastor Melin with the Rekieta boys.
Sorry for the off topic question. But when did Matt Christensen become a pastor? I thought he lived in Montana.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: anionfarflung
Sorry for the off topic question. But when did Matt Christensen become a pastor? I thought he lived in Montana.
I would assume a different Matt Christensen, MN. is filled with Scandi names and these aren't exactly the world's rarest combination. Likely just a coincidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sneed on Cloud 9
Sorry for the off topic question. But when did Matt Christensen become a pastor? I thought he lived in Montana.
There are two so I get the confusion. This is the one we're talking about.

1751648955778.webp

Isn't this the case with the majority of home-schooled kids though? The whole point of home schooling seems to me to be to keep them away from outside influences
I believe that to be the case, with some mitigation. Some serious power leveling, so I'll spoil.

It's no secret that I'm a mother. My kids also happen to be very successful athletes. Sports touring is no joke, and expensive.

You find yourself all over the country.

Over the years, I've been happy to have an extra kid or two or three stay for up to four nights in a (nicer) hotel with homeschooled kids, part of the club team. They sometimes have up to 5 siblings staying at cheaper hotels down the highway. I'm happy to help.

These kids are great athletes and normal enough. But me, being me, have asked them, and their parents, about homeschooling (nicely).

Yes, the answer is fear of socialization with others, and some religion, sometimes a bad school system. It's been characterized to me, paraphrasing: "The co-ops are three in our community: The Evangelicals, the Ortho Jews, and everyone else - the gays, trans, lefties."

The kids are great, but, yes, a bit odd. Nothing serious.

Here's my issue:

I recently asked an AMAZING athlete about whether she's looked into D1 scholarships, or D3 (she's a great student). She didn't even know that was a viable option. She's been told she can only go to the local community college and, maybe, onto a 4 year college IF she lives at home. I ring in with suggestions research she can do to expand her horizons. I'm not a social worker. That's her job, and her family's. It's not mine.

For non-American readers, I cannot tell you how stupid this is. Great athletes (boys and girls - thanks to Title IX) can get access to SO much money for their education in this country.

So, let's loop back to Rekieta. Let's assume the "physicist" and "chemist" is actually talented and even modestly brilliant. We can assume they're college-worthy (not a high bar). Every FUCKING one of Nick's male relatives went to college!!!!

He's never mentioned a single word about his kids education beyond... whatever they're doing. That Christian school does not graduate very many kids to 4 year colleges.

(And shut up about every college being lefty. Have you seen SMU or TCU or Alabama or even UVA or or or?)

What is even happening about these kids' futures? C Rekieta and A Rekieta are NOT going to be plumbers. They're scrawny sticks. Their father cannot even fix a hinge on a kitchen cabinet, or fix the audio on his feed. And coders. Okay, whatever. Welcome to the Farms, boys. Plenty of company here but I bet you excellent coders got some education.

Rant over. Thanks for reading if you got this far.

(Some of us invest a TON of time into our kids, and their future success. This man baffles me. The men in his family worked very hard to achieve the money he enjoys.)
 
Last edited:
I'm a little confused about why, after 6 months in the care of the Slettas (plenty of time to "deprogram"), a Rekieta kid or two didn't go rogue.
I Believe they were with his parents that whole time not hers. They have a home in MN that they were staying in with the kids till Nick got them back. The same place april was hiding for a bit after she got kicked out of the silent hill bathroom crack den
 
Has there ever been a single word from anyone about any of the children having friends?
The only mention, that I can recall, is the story Nick told about the nanny. In it, he says the nanny gave both his eleven year old daughter and her friend two Monster energy drinks...and other crazy things. He told that version on the Aaron Watch Party on Locals.
 
I Believe they were with his parents that whole time not hers. They have a home in MN that they were staying in with the kids till Nick got them back.
The kids definitely spent some time with Nick’s parents but the Slettas were the certified foster parents and had the kids. Bob and Celeste took multiple foreign vacations during that time (sans kids).
 
That's not actually what the language says, although it is fairly sloppy form language (it refers to the requirement to upload items pre-hearing and adds in parens a note referring to these items as "exhibits" or "evidence," but the presumption in the form is that what is uploaded will survive the hearing as evidence
I think that's a fair assessment but I will exploit their poorly crafted documents and language to my advantage.
 
I still think Nick did that.
I bet that sick fuck did it because he thought it would be weird and funny. I don't think Nick has the creativity to make up such a completely obviously bullshit lie if it wasn't based on something he personally did.
I think that's a fair assessment but I will exploit their poorly crafted documents and language to my advantage.
I think in the absence of any explicit statement to the contrary, the commonsense prevailing rule should apply, that is, if something is uploaded to an EVIDENCE database, it is EVIDENCE. Therefore, ambiguous language should be construed in the context of the prevailing rule.

It's not directly comparable, but for instance, there's generally a presumption that if a statute doesn't explicitly specify an evidentiary standard, it should default to the usual (e.g. preponderance in a civil case).

I also believe the conduct of the parties indicated everyone in any decision making role about this footage treated it as accessible to the public, and they explicitly addressed this specific coverage and the circumstances around it and limited, rather than forbade public access.

So it isn't as if SJW just had a lapse and wasn't even aware of this particular piece of evidence. He had explicitly addressed it in a written order as being public.

All of this very suddenly changed with a transparently contrived justification.

That said, while it's not conclusive by itself, the website language at the very least does not carve out an explicit exception and I'd definitely make the argument you are making. It's at least of minor cumulative value toward the burden of proof.

I think the advisory opinion from specialists in the specific law in question in the case is probably the best there is and that the appeals court would effectively have to reject its reasoning to make the wrong decision. I know it's not binding on them (and was not even binding on the sheriff) but I don't see that it can be simply hand-waved away as irrelevant.

I'll note that the sheriff and the court appear not even to have considered rejecting the legal reasoning underlying the opinion. Instead, they did an end run around it by retroactively changing the "facts." Hence, the panicked and ham-handed re-designation of the footage.
 
Last edited:
Isn't this the case with the majority of home-schooled kids though? The whole point of home schooling seems to me to be to keep them away from outside influences (and perhaps much of the dog-eat-dog bullying that happens in public schools.)
That's been my observation, too. And a lot of those kids are awkward (albeit often quite nice and polite). But as you said, the co-op model and the 8 billion activities should invite some level of socializing.

So I'd always had the impression that most home-schooled kids were somewhat isolated. Often coming from large families they seem to rely in siblings for social support.

All that said, I've got no experience of any of it. This is just an impression I've drawn from watching/reading about the process, so I might be completely off-beam here. Of course, we know that the Rekieta kids aren't home-schooled properly and it's more of a cooperative approach that gives them contact with many more kids than home-schooled children would normally get. Which does make the lack of friends/play dates/etc. somewhat weird.

But if you're a parent who's children attend that 'cooperative' how comfortable would you be allowing your kids to go and hang out at the Rekieta house? Even prior to the Quover, if you've watched Nick's YouTube streams and you're the kind of parent that's home schooling because of your faith, I suspect you'd have huge reservations about your kids hanging out together. Shit, I'm a stone cold atheist I'd I'm never sending MY kids over there. I don't want them sitting on Uncle Drexel's knee while he tells them bedtime stories.
And yeah, nfw I'd let my kids go to that house, even not knowing what I know of them. Their parents are clearly perceived in certain ways in the community, and probably not positive ones. And the parents also clearly have never really socialized casually with others in the community.

And I keep coming back to no mention of ever doing family things that are local and casual. Or the kids running around outside. No taking the dog for a walk, grilling out, playing kickball or touch football on the flat expanse behind the home. No playground stuff on the property. No hikes on the 8 billion trails in Minnesota, no leaf-peeping up North, no canoeing or picnicking as a family, no camp-outs in the backyard...nothing.

Of course, not mentioning it doesn't mean it doesn't happen...but do you see Nick and Kayla doing any of that? They are indoor consumers. Their hobbies are sex and tattoos and fighting. They take the kids to a hotel off 494 to go on indoor water slides once a year, on the way to the airport. They drop the kids in Texas on the way to Jamaica. Sure, there's that once-a-year camp thing, but otherwise, what?

Their kids are growing up in a state with a lot to offer, and people spend a lot of time outdoors, for good reason. There are also world-class art museums (at least one of which regularly hosts events for kids, including a big all-day bash in the Spring), multiple science museums, and a massive theater scene in Minneapolis (the Children's Theater is one of the best in the country). There is a damn art shanty festival every year. There are ice castles and a giant ice maze (world's biggest, I just read, though that can't be much competition...but still - fun and interesting) in the winter. There are tons of farms to visit, go berry, apple, pumpkin, etc., picking or get some unofficially offered raw milk. There are geological formations and underground caves to visit. There are the Boundary Waters way up by Canada, where you can portage or just canoe or kayak in total solitude and zero ambient light. An 8-hour drive (= number of hours the Rekietas totally really drive every single day) gets you to Chicago, if for some reason you wanted to visit. Sure, they live in Bumfuck (by choice), but most families go on excursions with their kids - for their kids. And in fact, good homeschoolers do some of these things (museums, theater) as part of the education itself.

Tl; dr: they suck.
 
Is Candy Yoshi some dumb hick jurisdiction where they don't even prosecute drunk driving? Because given the descriptions of how he was seething every time he got pulled over, how the fuck was he not drunk off his ass most of these times?
Minor PL: I went to college in a small town where the school and the supermarket were the largest employers. One of the school admins got picked up by the local cops after she got drunk and drove into a ditch. They drove her home and nobody spoke of it again.

Personally I think everything, from him getting away with driving his kids around while being blitzed out of his mind to the county burying the bodycam footage, can be chalked up to small town politics. They'll let you get away with a lot of petty shit if you have cash to throw at the local sheriff's reelection fund. You have to be really fucking bad for the police to say "Whelp, guess I gotta get off my ass and do something about this."
That or his parents hate each other and that's part of why Nick's so fucked up
Nick's Parents' problem is they spared the rod one too many times. These are the same people who cleaned his pigsty of a house after the raid instead of threatening to cut him out of the trust fund if he didn't do it. They're like CWC's parents in the sense that they enabled every one of his bad behaviors to the point of lolcowdom.
 
How many 5k locals people are in here?
Nick might like a class action lawsuit to distract him from August 1st & Monty's case.
I am. I fell for his little speech about being the first of his 5k subscribers. I didn’t subscribe just for the gift but I also expected the guy to follow through with his promise. Now we all know how that went.
 
And yeah, nfw I'd let my kids go to that house, even not knowing what I know of them. Their parents are clearly perceived in certain ways in the community, and probably not positive ones. And the parents also clearly have never really socialized casually with others in the community.
At most, if I had kids and they wanted to socialize with the Rekieta kids, it would have to be at my home. Nobody wants their kids around some drug-addled weirdo whose social circle consists entirely of pedophiles.
 
No hikes on the 8 billion trails in Minnesota
To be fair, about 10 years ago Kayla posted on FB that she and Nick had left all the kids home alone (the seven year old oldest son was “babysitting”) while the two of them went hiking and out for a meal. Bob Rekieta replied with his enthusiastic approval.
 
Back