Null is out of touch with women

* I haven't been on dating sites in years, but "if you like/hate Trump; if you like/hate cops; if you like/hate banks; if you like/hate abortion; if you like/hate Jesus, etc., we have nothing to talk about so keep it moving" has been out there forever. (I refer to dating sites because that's where you can see it in black & white.)
Let's be honest, most men would fall to their knees for a crumb of pussy. The right wing, or even male equivalent, that you are talking about is extremely few and far between. The voting gap has never been bigger, and I have personally rarely found right wingers outside of very select circles. It is probably why they have a larger internet presence; they are so disaffected with current leadership its not really much of a mystery why they flock to certain outlets. Modern men are some of the weakest partisans.
It is especially bad with the zoomer crowd. I dont know how long you have been out of the loop, but it does seem to be worse.
Lol. Women have been being told to "behave" forever.
Not anymore. At least not by men. I think modern men have a serious difficulty or apprehension in critiquing women in terms of politics or social attitudes. The only ones who do bother to critique them publically are mostly fucking droolers or provocateurs because the subject is considered taboo. I think traditional male communication styles like directness are also increasingly more frowned upon in more technical fields.
 
In case that wasn't obvious, the whole "noooo you can't date young women, dating women in their twenties is creepy" shit is just women PAST their prime trying to forbid you from dating women who are still IN their prime. And there's no moral reason for it, they only repeat this meme because a 37 year-old woman with inflated ego who is set in her ways, cannot compete with a 25-year-old woman who might still be reasoned with (and unlike the former, can still reliably have children).
It's like if men started collectively arguing that dating a guy who has a stable income is somehow immoral.
No woman is jealous she can't date the 50 year old Bachelor who has to fly to Bangkok to find a wife. That is just made up male cope, lmao. There's also no 20 year old women desperately looking to date old wrinkly men unless you are talking about sugarbabies, which is just prostitution. There's been several studies that show women remain attracted to men of similar age as them through their entire life, while men eternally want 21 year olds no matter how old they are. There's not enough 21 year olds that want to date grandpas around for all the old pervs, sorry to be the bearer of bad news. Those situations are rare and financially motivated.

I think it's funny tho that men always say "Once I am old and wrinkly but have a HOUSE and a JOB I can just get a woman who is young and likes that I am established!" but then also call women who exploit men for resources golddiggers.
 
No woman is jealous she can't date the 50 year old Bachelor who has to fly to Bangkok to find a wife. That is just made up male cope, lmao.
Has it ever occurred to you that motivations other than jealousy could be a factor? Such as perceived unfairness, resentment, etc. I am not jealous of someone who does drugs because of how good they feel, but I am resentful of the fact that my tax money goes to supporting them unproductively, I would not want to do drugs myself. He never mentioned "jealousy".
It seems like you can only relate to other people through projection, which is probably why you are so miserable and have poor relationships with men. This is frequently a cluster B trait.
 
Meanwhile most of the women I interact with on a daily basis are pretty middle of the road and have typical family lives. Dig deep enough you find out a handful of them were morons when they were 20, but thankful the Internet wasn't as accessible then.
I think this pretty accurate, I actually talk to alot women and I get same general feelings, I feel like the people who think all women are x, probably don't interact much with them if at all and seeing it through a skewed view on internet or colleges
 
As age gaps increase, so does the likelihood of divorce. Also the average age gap is only ~3 years and in North America only 8% of relationships have a gap of 10 years or more (and let's be real, those situations are often financially motivated). If you're looking for something real and not a fling it makes sense to pursue someone in your own age bracket.
 
As age gaps increase, so does the likelihood of divorce. Also the average age gap is only ~3 years and in North America only 8% of relationships have a gap of 10 years or more (and let's be real, those situations are often financially motivated). If you're looking for something real and not a fling it makes sense to pursue someone in your own age bracket.
yeah but if i do that then i won't be able to manipulate younger women with less life experience than me
 
As age gaps increase, so does the likelihood of divorce.
Autism also!

GEPqqwcbMAAW-xf.jpeg
 
Modern men are some of the weakest partisans.
It is especially bad with the zoomer crowd.
If only we were stronger partisans then everything would be fixed, right? Just launch everyone over the age of 35 into the sun, holy shit.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: ._.
If only we were stronger partisans then everything would be fixed, right? Just launch everyone over the age of 35 into the sun, holy shit.
I'm talking about my own generation retard. And yes pretty much; It might be nice if generally speaking white people would stop their constant groveling and civic nationalism crap when they're just being constantly stepped on by pretty much everyone. White people and especially white men are the only group that actively defends other minorities to their own detriment to a pathological extent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: geckogoy
I'm talking about my own generation retard. And yes pretty much; It might be nice if generally speaking white people would stop their constant groveling and civic nationalism crap when they're just being constantly stepped on by pretty much everyone. White people and especially white men are the only group that actively defends other minorities to their own detriment to a pathological extent.
I revise my statement to "launch everyone who has voted in an election" into the sun. You're up against a monster that has been growing and devouring more and more for a hundred years now. Voting or hating brown people more isn't going to do anything.
 
Last edited:
lol shift those goalposts more civnat nigger
How am I shifting anything or in any way being a civic nationalist? The average man being a "better partisan" or whatever the fuck demonstrably would not have stopped the Hart-Celler act. You don't actually have well thought out beliefs or an understanding of American history.
 
The average man being a "better partisan" or whatever the fuck demonstrably would not have stopped the Hart-Celler act.
why? Even if thats true, so then there's nothing men could've done to stop anything? What kind of absurdist retard argument is this? What is your alternative? I'm not sure how anyone can possibly come to the conclusion that more white people more invested in traditional values would result in the same outcome.
 
why? Even if thats true, so then there's nothing men could've done to stop anything? What kind of absurdist retard argument is this? What is your alternative? I'm not sure how anyone can possibly come to the conclusion that more white people more invested in traditional values would result in the same outcome.
Because it was passed by congress with no input from the American people, dumbass. At the time people were quite upset about it. These are issues that go back to World War I and the advent of centralized banking. While there is infinite money pushing elected officials towards doing certain things nothing will change. The average man has always been inconsequential. Outside of bloody conflict it would take a group of people with the right ideals becoming wealthy enough that they can't be ignored without being assassinated first or otherwise kneecapped along the way. Making your identity about how much you don't like brown people does nothing to make that happen.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ._.
Because it was passed by congress with no input from the American people, dumbass. At the time people were quite upset about it.
Obviously not pissed off enough. In case you didn't know, the populace controls who gets elected. It doesn't seem to have even registered as a major election issue in subsequent years. Everyone seems to have just memory holed it, owing once again to the goldfish like memory and care of the average person, and ultimately proving my point.

All you have to do is look at the modern day voting patterns of white men who actively vote for people and immigration policies who walk all the fuck over them. There shouldnt be a single white man who votes for the open boarder, vax mandate, equity university admissions, and global justice party. Yet their biggest donor group seem to be older white men from the boomer and silent generation. How does that make any sense? Look at the male voting patterns. Only white men are somewhat evenly split between the two group, every other demographic is in fucking lockstep with globohomo mission. Only in a white country can you get elected as a minority. White people are the only example on the planet of this. White people are the only demographic on the whole planet who have ceded power to everyone else, and this has nothing to do with central banking.
These are issues that go back to World War I and the advent of centralized banking
I don't really see how that is entirely the case since pretty much every nationalist movement ever came after the advent of central baking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AveraDiane
Only white men are somewhat evenly split between the two group, every other demographic is in fucking lockstep with globohomo mission. Only in a white country can you get elected as a minority. White people are the only example on the planet of this. White people are the only demographic on the whole planet who have ceded power to everyone else, and this has nothing to do with central banking.
This is just funny at this point. So wealth consolidated around a group of people all pushing a specific agenda and you can't see why this might have resulted in an agenda being pushed and white people becoming more economically disenfranchised and spineless?
I don't really see how that is entirely the case since pretty much every nationalist movement ever came after the advent of central baking.
Many nationalist movements came about as a direct response to centralized banking disenfranchising the population. That was like the entire point of the NS German worker's party. Many other nationalist movements came about because they are directly funded controlled opposition. What they have in common though is that they have done nothing except get people killed or make them societal outcasts. Have fun with all the TRSfags and /pol/tards though. You are in good company.
 
Back