Null is out of touch with women

How much disagreements until he gets barred by the Serbian government?
I think Null living in Serbia probably skews his perception probably. He probably assumes western women are like Eastern European/Balkan women (they’re not lol). While Belgrade, Tirana or Zagreb women are slowly morphing into woke liberals (sadly), there’s still a lot of wife material that exists in that region and maybe Null has interacted with such women.
 
I think Null living in Serbia probably skews his perception probably. He probably assumes western women are like Eastern European/Balkan women (they’re not lol). While Belgrade, Tirana or Zagreb women are slowly morphing into woke liberals (sadly), there’s still a lot of wife material that exists in that region and maybe Null has interacted with such women.
I can confirm about the Western European women, they are definitely not as humble as the Eastern European women let’s put it at that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: geckogoy
Exercise always. But really, I think the idea of "getting laid" needs to be done away with because the importance of sex looms too large over the modern mind. Don't worry so much about sex, it's just a thing that naturally happens when you live your life.
I think this is a good idea in theory but having people get laid and enjoy it is better in the long run because it gets rid of a lot of neuroses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomniman
There's your issue lads, don't shit talk women on the whole when you're actually complaining about the slim band of them that you're looking at to wife.

Women in their twenties keep their heads down and go with the flow until they understand the world enough to be confident in an idea enough to stand against the crowd and risk it all for it.

We're evolved more around survival than our lovely male counterparts and there's no time in our lives that we're more vulnerable than when our bodies come of age, but our minds have not. Without the physical ability to defend ourselves as men do we're reliant entirely on the tribe to keep us and our young safe, doesn't it make sense that we evolved to be more passive until our thirties, when, ideally we have our own family and means of home grown stability around us.

Most based women in their thirties start as awkward, lost, unsure twenty somethings.

On the other end of the scale it pays dividends online to be a BPD whore so that market is more brazen and out in the open than they were EVER allowed to be historically. And heaven forbid they become the model for lost young birds to follow before they level up, harden up and figure shit out.

I feel for those girls. I feel even more for the poor young lads they mercilessly string along in their absolute idiocy.

Fuck the gender wars, I hate them with all my heart. We're evolved to function best separately but together, on a parallel path together towards something better. Male and female are complimentary forces and globohomo or whatever you call it has gotten it all twisted up with 'feminism', 'mgtow' or any other dodgy, brain warping movements that prey on our youngsters.

Sorry for sperging, it's just all so tiring.
 
I think this is a good idea in theory but having people get laid and enjoy it is better in the long run because it gets rid of a lot of neuroses.
You're not wrong and I don't think sex is bad in and of itself, because of course it isn't. It's the total current day cultural preoccupation with it that's deeply unhealthy. I guess if you want to modify my post into a more complete train of thought and still have it be relatively broadly applicable, it'd be something like "don't have sex outside of serious, committed, monogamous relationships". Enjoy it, yes, but responsibly because it's no less a drug than liquor in terms of what it does to the brain and it will absolutely ruin you if you let it.
 
You're not wrong and I don't think sex is bad in and of itself, because of course it isn't. It's the total current day cultural preoccupation with it that's deeply unhealthy. I guess if you want to modify my post into a more complete train of thought and still have it be relatively broadly applicable, it'd be something like "don't have sex outside of serious, committed, monogamous relationships". Enjoy it, yes, but responsibly because it's no less a drug than liquor in terms of what it does to the brain and it will absolutely ruin you if you let it.
Yeah, I understand what you mean. I'm not advocating for mindlessly doing it or necessarily putting extra pressure on it. But it is something to encourage between men and women because a healthy sexual relationship provides so many benefits to someone's psyche especially if they're suspicious of the other sex.
 
Channing Creager wanted to be Null's girlfriend.
and Null wasn't interested.
Null just has high standards in women
 
I agree with him though. I've found Josh is pretty spot on with a lot of his takes on us broads. Problem is you don't hear from average birds much online and uni girls are babies that just ape the other kids in their circle, they represent maybe 5% of the total female population.

He's not right on everything, don't get me wrong, he seems to get us more than most. I mean, fuck me, the lad hits the pooner and fujo psychology on the head, that's rare insight into an obscure fembrained issue. You gotta respect him on that front at least.

Mind you, he does run a gossip forum...

Do you have a clip of his take on fujos? I personally thought that it's a sort of obsession over a model of an ideal heterosexual relationship dynamic (displayed as a homosexual one) that can eventually spin out of control and turn into poonerism. But there's probably a more raw element of lust in it too. I wonder what he would say about it.
 
I think null by the very nature of allowing just about anything on here does well by women.
GRANTED, while I personally don't like the man hating thread on here, I can respect that thats allowed to exist, WHILE a woman hating thread is also allowed to exist at the same time. You don't see that kinda shit anywhere, most places are EITHER an echochamber for whatever the popular view of the community is, OR, doesn't allow any spicy takes because it might offend. And even most of these don't tolerate any transphobia, so any grievance towards trannies is thrown in the trash.

I think OP going on about younger women being "less terf" is really only because males are more comfortably being openly politically incorrect. men are more willing to be confrontational about it, and especially when you consider all those TRAs saying terfs should be hung...yeah, doesn't shock me especially younger women are scared to voice things publicly. So I think null is doing good allowing actual women spaces for discourse, even if I'm really not personally fond of the man hate thread.
Is he allowing discourse, though? You see in the woman hate thread that any woman who expresses any contrary opinion to the other women gets flamed to shit and called "pick me whore", "tranny", etc

I guess that's what's so funny/sad about it. Null made an theoretically free speech section for women to talk about their opinions yet if they express the Wrong Opinion they get chased out.
 
Is he allowing discourse, though? You see in the woman hate thread that any woman who expresses any contrary opinion to the other women gets flamed to shit and called "pick me whore", "tranny", etc

I guess that's what's so funny/sad about it. Null made an theoretically free speech section for women to talk about their opinions yet if they express the Wrong Opinion they get chased out.
I think its particularly due to an infestation of feminist political lesbians : feminist political lesbians are pretty much incapable of saying a nice thing about men, and really, they should be kept out of any decisions of how men / women interact, both for the benefit of men, and straight women.
because otherwise, there's no circumstance they would side with a man even in a comically obvious situation where a guy should be sided with.
Unfortunately weeding them out isn't quite so simple.

But I think if you could IN THEORY keep the feminist political lesbians on a leash, the situation with women would be better.
Still, even with all that, its probably better on kiwi farms than a LOT of places for women, even if the manhate thread is basically full of that.
 
I think its particularly due to an infestation of feminist political lesbians : feminist political lesbians are pretty much incapable of saying a nice thing about men, and really, they should be kept out of any decisions of how men / women interact, both for the benefit of men, and straight women.
because otherwise, there's no circumstance they would side with a man even in a comically obvious situation where a guy should be sided with.
Unfortunately weeding them out isn't quite so simple.

But I think if you could IN THEORY keep the feminist political lesbians on a leash, the situation with women would be better.
Still, even with all that, its probably better on kiwi farms than a LOT of places for women, even if the manhate thread is basically full of that.
The problem, I think, is people take the political lesbian radfems seriously. When in fact I think they're about as deranged as the really fucked up incels, and thus should have their opinions disregarded. I'll never know what convinced Null that listening to a bunch of Ellen Rogers was a good idea, but the results speak for themselves. He can't go a single MATI without having a Male Feminist moment.
I saw Null's tweet and there was a response that was actually good:
View attachment 5671610
This is true. For the past 60+ years young women have always been more liberal than men. Especially when they are in college. As they get older, move out of the big city their college is, settle down in the suburbs and start families they become more conservative. However, and studies have shown this, more and more young women are staying single and by 2030 there will be more single women than married women which means more liberal women. I have a theory to this. I think this has to do with how porn sick men have become. A lot of Null's graphs that he showed in his tweets were from 2006. While porn did exist at that time it wasn't as prevalent as it is now. Not to mention the troon movement wasn't a thing back then. A lot of men today, due to porn addiction, have become more sexually violent and sexually degrading towards women. Even if the woman sticks with such a man there is a high chance that the man will troon out during a mid-life crisis making the woman waste years of her life for nothing. The Stinkditch is filled with such horror stories.
While I can understand and sympathize with men who aren't porn sick freaks trying to find a good woman but just see a sea of vapidness and materialism. However, women too have it bad when trying to find a man due to how prevalent and destructive porn is. Porn has destroyed society.
I genuinely don't think porn has made people into uber rapists. I think porn has many negative effects but I think the "all the men are turned into slobbering rape apes" thing is overstated and is being used to fearmonger. I think the aforementioned radical feminists love using that primordial fear to scare younger women into towing the line.
I agree with him though. I've found Josh is pretty spot on with a lot of his takes on us broads. Problem is you don't hear from average birds much online and uni girls are babies that just ape the other kids in their circle, they represent maybe 5% of the total female population.

He's not right on everything, don't get me wrong, he seems to get us more than most. I mean, fuck me, the lad hits the pooner and fujo psychology on the head, that's rare insight into an obscure fembrained issue. You gotta respect him on that front at least.

Mind you, he does run a gossip forum...
Null is incorrect about pooners because he falls for the typical feminist lie of "pooners and fujos only exist because icky men are just so scary and rapey! They just want to be safe uwu" instead of seeing it for the fetish shit it really is and damning it thus.

Source: interacted extensively in communities with pooners and fujos
 
Last edited:
Pure autism. Pure never leaves the house energy. Most of the women in my family are conservative. Why? They have brains and aren't animals like you suggest.

1706411041556.png


Reality is what it is. Getting mad about it doesn't change it.
 
Projection. If you actually didn't care, you'd be able to passively accept reality, instead of having an emotional reaction to a simple observation of it.
Reality is that women can vote. And should. Men are dumbasses. Just as women are. We even eachother out. Just because a election didn't go my way doesn't mean women aren't worthy of voting. Go back to /pol/
 
Reality is that women can vote. And should. Men are dumbasses. Just as women are. We even eachother out. Just because a election didn't go my way doesn't mean women aren't worthy of voting. Go back to /pol/

If it was a coin flip which way men or women might vote, you might have a point. But that's not reality. It's not just one election that didn't go the right way. Women vote the wrong way, every single time, in a completely predictable fashion. Again: Reality is what it is.

Now to be fair, you could largely correct for this problem by restricting the vote to only married women. It's probably not a coincidence that women who are discerning enough to vote the right way are also, by and large, the ones capable of pursuing and maintaining stable marriages. That doesn't change anything else I've said up to this point though.
 
Back