Null is out of touch with women

Next Highlight
Shadfan666xxx000 said:
I would rather address why women vote the way they do and address it instead of simply jumping to fix a flawed by introducing another flawed system and getting new headaches.
Click to expand...
It is the result of the homosexualization of the entire country. There is no future. There is the now. With a divorce rate of 50% and so many single women, what's clear is women are not interested in building a bright future and filling it with their children. That endeavor requires sacrifice, blood, sweat, and tears. And it also requires submission to men. Men who might not be ideal.

So, why go through the trouble of all that when you can just experience all the pleasures that life has to offer in the here and now? Modern society is bending over backwards to enable it. The State is the perfect husband! All legislation is based on fulfilling the desires of your homosexuality--your love of yourself. Why do women need men? In fact, why does anyone need anyone else when the perfect person stares back at you in the mirror?

The chief end of womankind is to achieve as much bodily autonomy they can within their current lifetime. This has been made achievable by your taxpayer dollars through various institutions. With drugs and abortion, children are no longer part of the equation. Motherhood is abandoned. There is no future. Children to single mothers aren't even people, they're basically pets that are fed and taken care of by the state while mommy gets to sit at home and talk about how anti-racist she is as she downs another bottle of whiskey. Her children are just another means for mommy to obtain even gimmes from the state. Plus, she gets to signal her worth as stronk and independent.

Men too are just a means for personal gain; but here's the catch. Enough men have caught onto the fact that being a woman basically gives you a free ride in Uncle Sam's wheelbarrow. So, as a result, the solution is to troon out. Now men get to be the women too; they get to become their own dream girl. Again, homosexualization of culture. Everyone has abandoned the future for the here and now and so what they vote for will reflect that.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: DaedraxKiwi, Nitro!, Puff and 12 others
geckogoy said:
Nigger we are experiencing the new headaches right now. The reason 'repeal the 19th' holds any weight is its fairly straightforward to prove that the current war mongering dipshit wouldn't be in power without it.
Click to expand...
You could say that for any president from the 1920s onwards. Do we discredit them for electing Eisenhower and Nixon? Do we forget that the worst president we ever had, before Biden at least, was elected all the way back in the 1850s with Franklin Pierce? Do we ignore the election of Ulysses S. Grant that heralded Teapot Dome or the brokered election of Rutherford B. Hayes? Even further back, when voting rights were most restricted, should we ignore John Adams and his Alien and Sedition Acts? Because if our concern is bad leaders being given power and we must be concerned with it enough that we should avoid it to the point that we should roll back voting rights then we might as well argue that we shouldn't even have a government. Because every system has given us poor executives and legislators and you're arguing that those are grounds to discontinue any mechanism that permits it.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: UERISIMILITUDO
Shadfan666xxx000 said:
I would rather address why women vote the way they do and address it instead of simply jumping to fix a flawed by introducing another flawed system and getting new headaches.
Click to expand...

What makes you think you're going to change the way they vote when they've been doing it consistently for decades and nothing has been able to change that? You are operating from the flawed premise of blank slatism. The reality is that preferences and behavior have a large baked in biological/genetic component that can't just magically be "fixed" by coping and feeling bad about it. Reality doesn't change just because it upsets you.

Shadfan666xxx000 said:
Then how do you plan to restrict the vote? Because if you plan to restrict it based on gender and economic standing (which is what you admit to earlier) then where will that end? Because you're now talking about a precedent that could easily reverse into itself further and go the opposite way by even further degrees than simply welfare recipients.
Click to expand...

I already said in an earlier post that any sort of voting restriction is obviously impossible for the foreseeable future. Talking about what should be =/= talking about what is. Unlike you I can recognize and accept reality, even when it doesn't square up the way I would prefer it to.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Need for Sped
usavoting.jpg
Today I will remind the moids that if only white women voted the GOP would win. The % would be higher if the GOP stopped trying to force women to give birth to rape babies.
 
  • Like
  • Autistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Nitro!, ApeBass, Operation Mincemeat and 3 others
Blackhole said:
View attachment 5675428
Today I will remind the moids that if only white women voted the GOP would win. The % would be higher if the GOP stopped trying to force women to give birth to rape babies.
Click to expand...
I think most of the notorious incelposters on here are not white men at all, so obviously they wouldn't want to ban the coloreds from voting instead of banning women. Also as we already established it's a thinly veiled desire to regain control of the sexual marketplace because none of these dudes have a chance at finding a woman if the women are allowed to run away from them.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Layton Mysteries, ApeBass, Lord Xenu and 3 others
gang weeder said:
What makes you think you're going to change the way they vote when they've been doing it consistently for decades and nothing has been able to change that? You are operating from the flawed premise of blank slatism. The reality is that preferences and behavior have a large baked in biological/genetic component that can't just magically be "fixed" by coping and feeling bad about it. Reality doesn't change just because it upsets you
Click to expand...
You keep ascribing viewpoints to me which I flatly deny. I don't deny that women are different than men.

gang weeder said:
I already said in an earlier post that any sort of voting restriction is obviously impossible for the foreseeable future. Talking about what should be =/= talking about what is. Unlike you I can recognize and accept reality, even when it doesn't square up the way I would prefer it to.
Click to expand...
I'm not even arguing the possibility. I've been arguing that I it were to begin that it would become something insidious and that it's not even the main problem to look for.
 
Shadfan666xxx000 said:
Do we discredit them for electing Eisenhower and Nixon?
Click to expand...
Depends, did they? Feel free to link the demography on that, if it was collected at the time. I'm also not really swayed that eisenhower was actually a good president, but if it turns out someone got elected in spite of women rather than because of them, you don't have much of a point.

e: upon cursory searching appears so, so I will just say he was kindof a statist shitbag and not good for the country, you can keep that one

Blackhole said:
Taking away access to abortion in border states while hundreds of thousands of 80 IQ misogynists swarm into America through the Rio Grande is a bad idea that will inevitability end in tragedy.
Click to expand...
Yeah that is completely retarded.
 
Last edited:
Lurker said:
itt men claiming to know what women want

male arrogance, as always
Click to expand...
And it's women claiming that women have suffered the most in war because their husband/brothers/fathers/sons die in them
Shadfan666xxx000 said:
If we were to reduce voting rights to what a college board would likely prefer to be voters (affluent, degree holders) then these results wouldn't match the common person and the common sense which knew what to do with the vote
Click to expand...
I never though I could hate a person who committed to acts of evil until I met a college educated man who believed he knew everything and talked about how great everything would be if certain types didn't get to vote. Mind you he was one of those people that claimed Rittenhouse open fire on a crowd of innocent protesters with a machine gun and then got off killing black people
Shadfan666xxx000 said:
I would rather address why women vote the way they do and address it instead of simply jumping to fix a flawed by introducing another flawed system and getting new headaches.
Click to expand...
because they are over-socialized and go with what the perceived group wants, and don't seem understand how a can lead to b. Even here the ladies have claimed them wanting mass migration doesn't mean they can be held responsible for immigrants raping little girls since that wasn't the inten
Blackhole said:
Today I will remind the moids that if only white women voted the GOP would win. The % would be higher if the GOP stopped trying to force women to give birth to rape babies.
Click to expand...
most abortion isnt because of rape
Lidl Drip said:
none of these dudes have a chance at finding a woman if the women are allowed to run away from them.
Click to expand...
Screenshot_20240129_005901_Chrome.jpg
we'd simply catch you.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Dumb
Reactions: Lurker, DeutschfagAufAbwegen, UERISIMILITUDO and 1 other person
God of Nothing said:
the fact you're incapable of realizing what the actual issue you should be concerned about here is indicative of the overall problem
Click to expand...
I do realise the real issue: Non-whites in positions of power are using that power to import more browns.
Cheeseknife said:
View attachment 5675479
Click to expand...
Not what I said. Stop masturbating to nigger rape cuckold porn.
m1ddl3m4rch said:
"Brownies can rape me all they want, as long as I can have the baby scraped out!" *votes blue*
Click to expand...
I don't vote Democrat, and i'd rather deport the shitskins instead of letting them rape women. You may disagree, because it would interfere with your cuckold fetish.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Winner
Reactions: Cheeseknife, UERISIMILITUDO, m1ddl3m4rch and 1 other person
davids877 said:
Doesn't that article say women take the lead after like 100 miles or something.
So I guess it depends on how much of a head start she has.
Click to expand...
it's been theorized that at super long distances women would be better. But it hasn't been proven. The main argument from this is that the difference between men and women running time per mile shrinks when looking at marathon to ultra marathon
 
Johnny Salami said:
because they are over-socialized and go with what the perceived group wants, and don't seem understand how a can lead to b. Even here the ladies have claimed them wanting mass migration doesn't mean they can be held responsible for immigrants raping little girls since that wasn't the inten
Click to expand...
Yes, that's been the answer from the start. Taking away the vote and campaigning against something they want won't work. You'd just get women who are resentful and can actually justify themselves instead of a bunch of shrews that you can argue down.
davids877 said:
Doesn't that article say women take the lead after like 100 miles or something.
So I guess it depends on how much of a head start she has.
Click to expand...
Who the hell runs a 100 miles straight?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back