NYT Secure Server Leak

To me, the juicy documents are the Teaching Project, the documents involving the 2008 financial crisis, Epstein documents, and the ones involving Biden (the cops one is absolutely lol).

One anon talked about a document that said that there was evidence linking SA to 9/11, and they were aware of it in 1999, but couldn't go after SA because they were important allies. But I haven't found it.
Can someone TLDR why the teaching doc is so funny, read it but feel like im missing something
 
Normies will never see or hear about any of this stuff, that's what's so goddamn depressing about these leaks. No matter how much hard evidence we find, they'll continue to eat the MSM propagandist slop day after day like the retarded cattle they've always been. FFS how many people still believes that Trump is a Russian asset because Maddow told them so. It's all so tiresome...
View attachment 1519895

As much as I hate putting troth in media figureheads, Tucker Carlson (or his writers) seem likely to cover this sort of thing. It's a treasure trove of clandestine documents, unflattering not just toward their industry rivals but various Democrat figureheads, Carlson's favorite target. He could glean so much material from this he'd be talking for days on end.
 
The school system functions perfectly fine. All this bullshit of "it was based off of a bad system" is bullshit because 90% of states in the world are based off that "Prussian" model. The Chinese do good in school "despite" their education being focused on loyalty to the communist party, and the Japanese, Russians and every other country does well when their model is focused on loyalty to the state.

there is another factor. When you look at the grades of European Americans and compare them to the grades of Europeans there's basically no difference; Europeans do as well as Europeans. When you compare black and hispanic grades to their counterparts outside America you, unsurprisingly, find that they do the same.

The reason American school grades appear to be lower is that America has a large dark population compared to Euro countries who are mostly ~80% white. You sucking in school has nothing to do with the system you were taught under. If you suck in school it's your fault, not the "system"
This isn't true. The issue with the system isn't the test results. It's the system itself which is built to instill a culture of following orders. It was good for the Prussians when they implemented it. It was good for Henry Ford when he needed factory workers. It isn't good anymore in an increasingly complex world that requires more thinking on your feet than following top down orders.

Even the Prussians, who became the Germans changed their system and they did it in the early 1900's to develop new tactics and better soldiers for WW1. Theres a reason everyone acknowledges German soldiers were the best soldiers of WW2 and it's due to their change in training.
 
Imagine being able to access the pay section of a porn site just by knowing the direct url to the video. A url you got from google.

Wait I remember doing this exact thing worked for one of the big news websites, Washington Post, or Economist maybe, or was it even NYT itself? You googled the article title and accessing it from the google search automatically bypassed the paywall. I think it stopped working recently.
 
Full archive of what Google has indexed for int.nyt.com/data/documenttools
filelist.png
 

Attachments

Oh don't get me wrong; I can the point of such a system -- In Prussia and in other Monarchies. However, the result of exporting such a system into a Democratic Republic was disastrous; You basically ended up with militant Democratic Trotskyites who think that Democracy is the natural base-line of humanity taking over US foreign policy by WW1, and from then on they constantly were surprised when removing monarchs and dictators would only lead to anarchy and then even more totalitarian movements taking control.
You're totally right, and that's something I didn't think about when responding to you
 
Anyone who talks about the info from this "leak" will now get banned off the goog platforms. Doesn't matter if it was reported before and now scrubbed from the www side of NYT's servers. It doesn't matter if its 100% valid info. All they have to do now is say it came from this "hack". They are all in on the INFOWARS. I guess this kinda was a honeypot.

whatisallowed.png


archive

Edit: If im late and gay, please forgive.
 
Last edited:
There's no way in hell I'd ever tell a pollster I'm voting for Trump. I don't want my house burned down, my tires slashed or my pets poisoned.

Still going to vote for him though and gloat when he wins.
And somehow the opposition is “dissident” and “revolutionary”
what a fucking farce the politics of the country has become; can someone just declare an authoritarian state and get this shit overwith
 
>same description

idk I thought it was interesting

btw wtf is environmental justice? no lyrical spiritual individual explanations pls
Uhhhhhh I think it has something to do with how black people are 75% more likely to live by "factories spewing toxic pollution" than white people. It was on the cover of the NYT magazine last week. Did anyone here read it? I assume it was BS because they could just move out lole.
 
btw wtf is environmental justice? no lyrical spiritual individual explanations pls
TL;DR housing is usually cheaper in high pollution areas, and that's somehow RACIST, because only black people can be poor, and no white/asian/hispanic/whatever people live near factories, highways, or airfields.

It also might have something to do with garbage dumps in the... what's the politically correct term now? "Emerging Markets"? But I assume it's strictly the first one.
 
TL;DR housing is usually cheaper in high pollution areas, and that's somehow RACIST, because only black people can be poor, and no white/asian/hispanic/whatever people live near factories, highways, or airfields.

It also might have something to do with garbage dumps in the... what's the politically correct term now? "Emerging Markets"? But I assume it's strictly the first one.
It's a weapon to guilt whites into allowing poor blacks into their safe neighborhoods. Obama used it to justify his mandate for 50% nonwhites in every neighborhood, the one Trump repealed.
 
“To your request of my opinion of the manner in which a newspaper should be conducted, so as to be most useful, I should answer, ‘by restraining it to true facts & sound principles only.’ Yet I fear such a paper would find few subscribers. It is a melancholy truth, that a suppression of the press could not more compleatly deprive the nation of its benefits, than is done by its abandoned prostitution to falsehood. Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knolege with the lies of the day. I really look with commiseration over the great body of my fellow citizens, who, reading newspapers, live & die in the belief, that they have known something of what has been passing in the world in their time; whereas the accounts they have read in newspapers are just as true a history of any other period of the world as of the present, except that the real names of the day are affixed to their fables. General facts may indeed be collected from them, such as that Europe is now at war, that Bonaparte has been a successful warrior, that he has subjected a great portion of Europe to his will, &c., &c.; but no details can be relied on. I will add, that the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods & errors. He who reads nothing will still learn the great facts, and the details are all false.”
—Thomas Jefferson, 14 June 1807​

The media, and centralized banking have always been enemies of the people.
 
It's a weapon to guilt whites into allowing poor blacks into their safe neighborhoods. Obama used it to justify his mandate for 50% nonwhites in every neighborhood, the one Trump repealed.
What can I say? I welcome the sentiment, especially when it involves thousands of fresh arrival migrants moving into any gated community preferred by Barry-O and liberal freak types. :optimistic:
 
>same description

idk I thought it was interesting

btw wtf is environmental justice? no lyrical spiritual individual explanations pls
As someone currently being forced to learn it to get a Poli Sci degree, effectively claiming that all environmental change disproportionately effects non-white people and women more than the evil straight white men.
 
Back