NYT Secure Server Leak

Okay, there is way more stuff here then I have time for, someone filter this down and let me and the other dumb people know what the most important things are that we are getting out of this

[editing to ask] Am I going to get party v& for grabbing these? because I have already dl. a good number of them
Generally, it's hard evidence of things that were discredited as right wing conspiracies and pretty much confirms what we knew already. As for the juicy bits so far, it's the ones regarding the 2008 financial crisis, Biden, Epstein (haven't gotten around to reading this yet), and the Teaching Project.

For the Biden campaign, their talking points are funny as hell. They want to focus on Trump's 'abuse' of power, deny any and all accusations against them ("Any claims against the Bidens are wholly unfounded. That's not a Biden campaign claim or a Biden claim. That's an irrefutable fact" is copypasta material right there), and they seriously still believe that 2016 was a fluke and Trump hijacked the election. In addition, the NYT is muzzling their reporters and making it so that they can only criticize Trump. They're shaping public opinion to influence an election.

The cops document is a letter from various black community leaders to Biden saying that if he isn't onboard with reforming or defunding the police, he won't get the black vote.

As for the Teaching Project, it's essentially about shoving social justice down the throats of the students. @spiritofamermaid summed it up on the second post of the thread and in another post: it's going to fuck up an entire generation and have devastating consequences for a few decades if it's forced into schools on a national scale.

During the 2008 financial crisis, bankers stole billions (if not a trillion) of dollars from taxpayers.

A document said that the FBI were aware of the Saudi Arabia and the 9/11 attacks as early as 1999, but couldn't go after them because they were important allies.

Ever since the leaks got attention twice, there's been no major outlets making articles about it, possibly out of fear of retaliation. Youtube coincidentally changed their policies after the leaks were brought up the second time, saying that all uploaded videos that contain 'leaked information' will be removed.
 
Its a lot of confirmations of things people already knew, but never had proof of. So really, kinda hard to get the ooomph you want out of it.
It’s hard material to use in a way that won’t immediately get countered by “you stole that info so it’s made up, neener neener :smug:
 
Wait I remember doing this exact thing worked for one of the big news websites, Washington Post, or Economist maybe, or was it even NYT itself? You googled the article title and accessing it from the google search automatically bypassed the paywall. I think it stopped working recently.
To access full articles from exile.ru (old War Nerd is a nice read) add "&PRINT=1" to the url or just press Esc after the article loads but before the payment popup blocks the page.

Anyway... even if the fucking CIA's black ops and UFO files or the Clintons' sex tape get leaked, it's going to be memoryholed because "interfering with X". You can't win my man.
 
there's some nasty stuff in there about some of their darlings is why. this feels like both "sides" won't want to touch it.

There's really nothing in these leaks that is too "damning" for anyone.
This is everyday shit for a big media outlet. It's interesting, but it's normal.
Nothing truly damning gets stored on easily accessed servers. It's just not how it works.
 
There's really nothing in these leaks that is too "damning" for anyone.
This is everyday shit for a big media outlet. It's interesting, but it's normal.
Nothing truly damning gets stored on easily accessed servers. It's just not how it works.

You'd be suprised at the incompetence of people
 
Back