Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
At this point it all depends on what the investigations turn up. If it does turn out that the big guy won fair and square, Trump's gonna have to eat that turd somehow. But first there has to be proof that the election was legitimate and there were no shenanigans.

Remember when burden of proof was on the accusers to provide irrefutable evidence of wrongdoing instead of the accused having to prove wrongdoing never took place? I do.
 
Remember when burden of proof was on the accusers to provide irrefutable evidence of wrongdoing instead of the accused having to prove wrongdoing never took place? I do.
The bad feeling Trump got in his stomach when he started losing Wednesday morning *was* the definitive proof of wrongdoing. Duh. Get your facts straight retard.

Can you prove Trump didn't get a bad feeling in his tum-tum when he realized he was losing? No? Well,
LOOK INTO MY EYES.jpg

Consider yourself owned, liberal.
 
The bad feeling Trump got in his stomach when he started losing Wednesday morning *was* the definitive proof of wrongdoing. Duh. Get your facts straight retard.

Can you prove Trump didn't get a bad feeling in his tum-tum when he realized he was losing? No? Well,
View attachment 1721486
Consider yourself owned, liberal.

Every time I look at that faggot’s face a part of me think’s it’s photoshopped. Everything about him is just pure uncanny valley, like he’s real but not real enough.
 
Remember when burden of proof was on the accusers to provide irrefutable evidence of wrongdoing instead of the accused having to prove wrongdoing never took place? I do.
I don't. This is politics, you're naive if you're expecting it to be anything other than a hypocritical shit-show.
 
What do you hate about him?
He's pathologically self-obsessed and indifferent to the truth; he's a philistine; he's spiteful, gauche, boastful and undignified; he's thin-skinned and whiny; he's unskilled at diplomacy and statecraft; he's a poor writer; he's fat and eats junk food; and, once you get beyond the initial novelty of watching the President of the United States shout insults at people, his persona becomes repetitive and tedious. Listening to him yell about how great he is is dull; listening to other people complain about him is dull. I'm eager for this all to be over.
 
He's pathologically self-obsessed and indifferent to the truth; he's a philistine; he's spiteful, gauche, boastful and undignified; he's thin-skinned and whiny; he's unskilled at diplomacy and statecraft; he's a poor writer; he's fat and eats junk food; and, once you get beyond the initial novelty of watching the President of the United States shout insults at people, his persona becomes repetitive and tedious. Listening to him yell about how great he is is dull; listening to other people complain about him is dull. I'm eager for this all to be over.
Much like your posting
 
He's pathologically self-obsessed and indifferent to the truth; he's a philistine; he's spiteful, gauche, boastful and undignified; he's thin-skinned and whiny; he's unskilled at diplomacy and statecraft; he's a poor writer; he's fat and eats junk food; and, once you get beyond the initial novelty of watching the President of the United States shout insults at people, his persona becomes repetitive and tedious. Listening to him yell about how great he is is dull; listening to other people complain about him is dull. I'm eager for this all to be over.
And yet, most of his gripes are rooted in legitimate concerns.

For example: "Who built the cages, Joe?"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back