Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

[Sneed's Feed And Seed]

There's fraud in every election

And this is acceptable to you?!

 

[BlackDragoons]

And this is acceptable to you?!

Both sides are guilty of it and none of it is acceptable. Just reeks of hypocrisy when the right sperges out about stolen elections when they profited from the 2016 elections and that everything was kosher with it.

 

[TherapyMan]

So, I did some digging on that, and I can't find the full context behind Giuliani saying "This is not a fraud case." -

The audio can be found here, wherein Rudy completely fucked up the standard of review by asking for "normal scrutiny." Full audio can be found here. Original complaint here. Full docket here.

 

[Hippopatumus]

Both sides are guilty of it and none of it is acceptable. Just reeks of hypocrisy when the right sperges out about stolen elections when they profited from the 2016 elections and that everything was kosher with it.

Good point. We should definitely get rid of no-id, mail-in elections with zero chain of custody before 2022 then. This is obviously appealing to both sides right?

 

[BlackDragoons]

Good point. We should definitely get rid of no-id, mail-in elections with zero chain of custody before 2022 then. This is obviously appealing to both sides right?

Republicans where pushing mail in ballots hard in Arizona with its voter population voting mail in at 75%. The only reason why it became bad was that orange man said so.


You also still had to register to vote with a valid signature. Hell Utah was pushing mail in ballots even after Trump said it was prone to fraud.

 

[Hippopatumus]

Republicans where pushing mail in ballots hard in Arizona with its voter population voting mail in at 75%. The only reason why it became bad was that orange man said so.


You also still had to register to vote with a valid signature. Hell Utah was pushing mail in ballots even after Trump said it was prone to fraud.

Oooooooh a valid signature. That sounds ironclad.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

And this is acceptable to you?!

It's not, and any that happens should be prosecuted, but the small amount that does happen isn't going to sway the election.

It's just amazing how you tards were not sperging this hard about voting fraud until your guy lost. Why didn't you guys call for audits in 2016? Why aren't you calling for audits in the senate races? I mean, I know why, but still

 

[BlackDragoons]

Oooooooh a valid signature. That sounds ironclad.

Better then your moms pants.

 

[Paranoia Machine]

There's about 250 poll workers in Michigan alone that have filed affidavits stating they witnessed tampering and fraud. That's under oath.

Lawyers are, generally speaking, some of the most spineless and cowardly people in our society. It's not surprising at all that some of the less established lawyers on trump's legal team have acted like rats on a sinking ship.

Are you referring to what Rudy said while his hair was melting on live TV?
Because if you recall, he was almost immediately asked to share his findings with the class and he said he couldn't share his findings because it would "ruin these people's lives" which is such a pussy excuse that the Republican lady standing behind him cracked a smile. Though in her defense she could have been laughing about his hair dye melting off his head and forming a chinstrap in real time before America's eyes.

So until Rudy can substantiate his claims in a court case, or provide proof to the American people beyond waving a bit of paper around and saying it's a written affidavit; his claims hold as much water as a colander.

 

[Hüftpriester]

It's not, and any that happens should be prosecuted, but the small amount that does happen isn't going to sway the election.

It's just amazing how you tards were not sperging this hard about voting fraud until your guy lost. Why didn't you guys call for audits in 2016? Why aren't you calling for audits in the senate races? I mean, I know why, but still

Again, we weren't sperging in 2016 because there weren't an unusual number of mail in ballots. Covid1984 set the precedent for potentially massive fraud, on levels we've never seen before. What is Biden's total vote count now? 80 million? That breaks the previous record by over 10 million. Nothing to see here though right?

Are you referring to what Rudy said while his hair was melting on live TV?
Because if you recall, he was almost immediately asked to share his findings with the class and he said he couldn't share his findings because it would "ruin these people's lives" which is such a pussy excuse that the Republican lady standing behind him cracked a smile. Though in her defense she could have been laughing about his hair dye melting off his head and forming a chinstrap in real time before America's eyes.

So until Rudy can substantiate his claims in a court case, or provide proof to the American people beyond waving a bit of paper around and saying it's a written affidavit; his claims hold as much water as a colander.

 

[tantric_depressive]

Are you referring to what Rudy said while his hair was melting on live TV?
Because if you recall, he was almost immediately asked to share his findings with the class and he said he couldn't share his findings because it would "ruin these people's lives" which is such a pussy excuse that the Republican lady standing behind him cracked a smile. Though in her defense she could have been laughing about his hair dye melting off his head and forming a chinstrap in real time before America's eyes.

So until Rudy can substantiate his claims in a court case, or provide proof to the American people beyond waving a bit of paper around and saying it's a written affidavit; his claims hold as much water as a colander.

Do you have a link handy to Rudy's hair melting? It sounds hilarious, but I don't wanna waste hours trying to find it amongst the uncountable amounts of media that have been made about this topic since it entered the new cycle

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Again, we weren't sperging in 2016 because there weren't an unusual number of mail in ballots. Covid1984 set the precedent for potentially massive fraud, on levels we've never seen before. What is Biden's total vote count now? 80 million? That breaks the previous record by over 10 million. Nothing to see here though right?

And? More people voted this year. Why don't you want people voting?

 

[Drain Todger]

I still can't believe that one of the guys at Dominion is an Antifa dude whose last name is literally Coomer.

You can't even make this shit up.

 

[Paranoia Machine]

Do you have a link handy to Rudy's hair melting? It sounds hilarious, but I don't wanna waste hours trying to find it amongst the uncountable amounts of media that have been made about this topic since it entered the new cycle

Fuck me, you are not kidding. Here is one that doesn't have a reporter or some pseudo-comedian talking over it.

 

[Hippopatumus]

And? More people voted this year. Why don't you want people voting?

Shouldn't you be coloring or something right now?

 

[Dyn]

It's not, and any that happens should be prosecuted

I disagree with this, I think it's important enough to the public interest that Trump is removed from power that we can all agree as a society to overlook the occasional oversteps some people might have made in 2020, even if it's technically not entirely legal.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Shouldn't you be coloring or something right now?

If your only way to win the election is to get people to not vote, you must have a shitty candidate

 

[Jason "Qriist" Close]

the small amount that does happen isn't going to sway the election.

You often speak as if your opinion is accepted fact.

"small" is an ambiguous descriptor. What does it mean? 5 dead voters? A dozen guys harvesting ballots? A handful of malicious vote counters? 2 election officials doxxing 2 other election officials over legitimate concerns?

All of these example are "small" but some present much larger threats to the process. Your opinion that these "small" occurrences won't change the outcome is rooted in a belief that nobody in a position of authority (or anyone who is acting on behalf of that authority) is afflicted with TDS, which we absolutely know is a false assumption.

You don't know the depth of the scandal. It could be a few insignificant raindrops splattered on the ground, it could be a puddle that you want to take care to step over, or it could be New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina and people are steering boats between the roofs of houses. You don't know because you aren't thinking. You won't engage with with the evidence.

Reject the evidence on the soundness of the evidence, and that alone. I have done that with some things. I don't buy into the Benford's Law flag because it's long noted as inapplicable for elections. I've also mostly rejected the Sharpiegate stuff, because it seems both unlikely and unprovable. Finally, I have discounted (but not dismissed) some of the poll worker allegations because many of them did not raise a flag to authorities while actually working the polls; though I still want to know if there are cameras in the counting centers because many allegations can be easily confirmed by reviewing the security footage.

I want Trump to win, but only if it's legitimate. I don't want Biden to win, but I will abide if it's legitimate.

Metaphorically speaking, the election is a coin flip at this point and we are mid-flip.

Digging into the evidence is the only way to make sure the referee can be trusted to make an honest call.

As I said a few paragraphs ago, you won't engage with with the evidence.

This is you.

 

[Kerr Avon]

Its funny how it went from non existent to its in every election but so small the effect is negligible

That narrative flipped harder & faster than the 41%

 

[Hippopatumus]

As I said a few paragraphs ago, you won't engage with with the evidence.

This is what makes me think he's probably a shill; he just repeats the same loop every day bypassing new updates and current events as if they never happened.