Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

[Sheryl Nome]

Is there still copium going on aboiut how trump will still win lmao

 

[Hüftpriester]

And? More people voted this year. Why don't you want people voting?

I could sperg out for paragraphs on this question but I'll just quote Sid Vicious to make my point. When asked if he thinks of the man on the street when making records he said "No, I've met the man on the street. He's a cunt"

Democracy is mob rule. When you have dense populations of barely literate retards in urban areas, their votes will eventually cancel out everyone else. They are controlled like cattle by their masters and have little to no ability to think for themselves.

At the very least, you should have to prove you're not dependent on welfare before you're allowed to vote.

 

[Jimjamflimflam]

>300lb Grandma

That's some grandma if she weighs that much and still made it to old age.

Don't underestimate the obesity issue in America.

Both sides are guilty of it and none of it is acceptable. Just reeks of hypocrisy when the right sperges out about stolen elections when they profited from the 2016 elections and that everything was kosher with it.

What was the fraud in 2016? Everything i remember was how unfair the electoral college was.

Edit: and a two year investigation into a nothing burger over Russians buying ads on Facebook.

 

[Andrew Neiman]

I could sperg out for paragraphs on this question but I'll just quote Sid Vicious to make my point. When asked if he thinks of the man on the street when making records he said "No, I've met the man on the street. He's a cunt"

Democracy is mob rule. When you have dense populations of barely literate retards in urban areas, their votes will eventually cancel out everyone else. They are controlled like cattle by their masters and have little to no ability to think for themselves.

Not you, though. You’re smarter than that.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

You often speak as if your opinion is accepted fact.

"small" is an ambiguous descriptor. What does it mean? 5 dead voters? A dozen guys harvesting ballots? A handful of malicious vote counters? 2 election officials doxxing 2 other election officials over legitimate concerns?

All of these example are "small" but some present much larger threats to the process. Your opinion that these "small" occurrences won't change the outcome is rooted in a belief that nobody in a position of authority (or anyone who is acting on behalf of that authority) is afflicted with TDS, which we absolutely know is a false assumption.

You don't know the depth of the scandal. It could be a few insignificant raindrops splattered on the ground, it could be a puddle that you want to take care to step over, or it could be New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina and people are steering boats between the roofs of houses. You don't know because you aren't thinking. You won't engage with with the evidence.

Reject the evidence on the soundness of the evidence, and that alone. I have done that with some things. I don't buy into the Benford's Law flag because it's long noted as inapplicable for elections. I've also mostly rejected the Sharpiegate stuff, because it seems both unlikely and unprovable. Finally, I have discounted (but not dismissed) some of the poll worker allegations because many of them did not raise a flag to authorities while actually working the polls; though I still want to know if there are cameras in the counting centers because many allegations can be easily confirmed by reviewing the security footage.

I want Trump to win, but only if it's legitimate. I don't want Biden to win, but I will abide if it's legitimate.

Metaphorically speaking, the election is a coin flip at this point and we are mid-flip.

Digging into the evidence is the only way to make sure the referee can be trusted to make an honest call.

As I said a few paragraphs ago, you won't engage with with the evidence.

This is you.
View attachment 1739316

I haven't seen valid evidence. Retards cherry picking data and making correlation graphs and unsubstantiated tweets don't count as evidence, despite what you may wish to believe. Trump's own lawyers, when under oath, said there's no evidence of election fraud.

Its funny how it went from non existent to its in every election but so small the effect is negligible

That narrative flipped harder & faster than the 41%

You're so mad at me that you even changed your username to reflect it. And yes, you gotta be a retard to not think that, with 360 million people, there's going to always be that one person. But widespread voter fraud to the effect where it'll change the election results is a way different beast. There's fraud in every election, and yes, it should be prosecuted, but to believe there's this widespread voting fraud this year just because Dear Leader lost is pretty retarded

 

[Hüftpriester]

Not you, though. You’re smarter than that.

Yes, I'm willing to bet I'm smarter than average urban dweller that voted for biden. I also don't depend on welfare. But in my ideal state, I wouldn't be voting either.

 

[RudeRoasts]

The audio can be found here, wherein Rudy completely fucked up the standard of review by asking for "normal scrutiny." Full audio can be found here. Original complaint here. Full docket here.

So essentially, this particular suit was about access to observe the vote counting - ala the complaints expressed by many poll watchers about being forced to stand to far away to actually observe tabulation.

So, essentially, NYT was lying - this specific suit has nothing to do with fraud, but that doesn't mean the same for others.

@Hollywood Hulk Hogan

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Yes, I'm willing to bet I'm smarter than average urban dweller that voted for biden. I also don't depend on welfare. But in my ideal state, I wouldn't be voting either.

Yes, you just come off as so intelligent.

 

[Jason "Qriist" Close]

lalalalalalalala

This is you.

 

[Andrew Neiman]

Yes, I'm willing to bet I'm smarter than average urban dweller that voted for biden. I also don't depend on welfare. But in my ideal state, I wouldn't be voting either.

I'm pleased to know I'm in the presence of an ubermensch. Complaining about people on welfare is Limbaugh-tier, though, especially when unemployment is over 6 percent due to COVID.

 

[potato in mah painus]

Yes, you just come off as so intelligent.

You come off as this tbh:

 

[Hüftpriester]

Yes, you just come off as so intelligent.

I could see how that would be your perception since you have a limited vocabulary outside of the words cope, Qtard and trumptard

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

This is you.
View attachment 1739395

Sorry that random tweets of hearsay aren't valid evidence

 

[Sterbenchu]

I'm just here to test my new avatar

 

[Nauseated Courgi]

I'm just here to test my new avatar

Should have done that in the desert bus thread.

 

[Zeke Von Genbu]

Should have done that in the desert bus thread.

Wait, this isn't the desert bus thread?

 

[Hüftpriester]

I'm pleased to know I'm in the presence of an ubermensch

That's right Shlomo, respect your betters.

Complaining about people on welfare is Limbaugh-tier

Even broken clock is right twice a day. No sane society would empower parasites and freeloaders. Also, the 6% unemployment rate (which is barely above average) is not due to covid, it's due to unnecessary lockdowns.

 

[Jason "Qriist" Close]

Sorry that random tweets of hearsay aren't valid evidence

The few times I've presented hearsay I've couched it within a framework of "this is credible because of this or that reason" and also "we need verification, here's how to do that".

You've applied no logic whatsoever to debunk any argument.

This is you.

 

[Andrew Neiman]

Even broken clock is right twice a day. No sane society would empower parasites and freeloaders.

Thankfully society has strong, independent-minded people like you to keep things going.

 

[Mister Qwerty]